From the article:
“ I've never seen another faith community be put in a position where they need to have some kind of a community consultation to justify their existence or presence in a place," he said. "It upsets me that there is even the sense that there's a need for that."
They are blaring a call to prayer over a speaker that can be heard over a kilometer in all directions, what did they think was going to happen?
I highlighted a part in this screenshot due to its absurdity. “Unexpected backlash” ?
Really? The media is a joke.
Will the Regina Police clarify what they deem as ‘threats’? Canadians are frightened given the assault of Islam on Europe and in Africa. Is voicing our concern a threat? Are we allowed to question or does the state now forbid this?
After he was done beating the absolute brakes off the guy who allegedly threatened to rape his wife & grandkids, Pastor Spell told his church: "I fulfilled scripture, I laid hands on the sick."
No, I’m not joking. That’s one hell of a line. 😂
If all of this is true: HERO! 🫡
🇨🇦’s democracy isn’t dying. It died overnight.
April 23, 2026: Ontario politicians passed a “law” exempting THEMSELVES from public scrutiny—in the middle of the night.
Every irreversible collapse starts the same way.
First the public is an inconvenience. Then we’re the enemy.
Well "kakistocracy" occurs when the society is fully parasitized by idea pathogens that causes its leaders to swim in the infinity pool of suicidal empathy.
I pray that Canada recovers.
Unironically a better explanation is that male wizards don’t give a fuck about their age or appearance because they studied for power or research purposes.
Female wizards, being women, would be acutely aware that crones have a bad rep and being hot gets them free shit. Therefor, the top priority would be preserving and maintaining their youth.
Both end up obscenely old, but witches have their magic skin-care routine they all go through because nobody wants to be caught with a stray wrinkle at the weekly coven meeting.
There are people who (very stupidly) supported the Liberals' Combating Hate Act on the grounds that it might arrest the insane levels of Islamist extremism on our streets. Welp, here's its first-ever invocation by police: A threat to Canadians concerned about Muslim calls to prayer being broadcast over Regina for the first time.
“Resist. Resist it while you still can and before the right to complain is taken away from you. You will be told you can’t complain because you’re Islamophobic.”
~Christopher Hitchens
🔔🔨 Many Canadians lost track of Bill C-8 while focused on C-9 & C-22.
It’s a key bill banning people from internet access by ministerial order in secret and banning you from having a phone and from telling anyone about it.
🛑 Up to $50,000 in fines for the people & the First Fine is $25 K and up to 2 years in jail if you dare to publicly disclose your erasure from the Internet & telephone communications.
Do you get it yet?
🛎️ Pierre Elliot Trudeau in his 1968 Election Campaign said he would build a
“free and just society”.
He embraced globalism and communism as the path to success and quietly went about implementing his goals via the fake Constitution 1982 and a disempowering Charter.
The people were definitely limited under a colonial rule book. Interesting that only a few politicians called him out for the deception & the ruse.
And then Mulrooney and Harpoon picked up the batons and carried on with the New World Order Agenda.
“Canada’s Bill C-8 (the Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts) establishes the most sweeping federal cybersecurity framework in Canadian history. It introduces strict mandatory cybersecurity compliance for operators of vital cyber systems across federally regulated industries, including banking, telecommunications, energy, and transportation.”
$15 million dollar penalties if companies do not comply and a total shut down.
Do as we say or else!
Here it begins.
Canada’s new “hate crime” legislation has only just been passed, and already it is being used as a cudgel to threaten people and suppress the expression of views which are not government approved.
Canada is fast becoming a censorship state.
It is intolerable for the US to have an imitation Chinese dictatorship on its northern border.
Massive pressure must be brought to bear to force the Canadian regime to roll back the draconian legislation which is suppressing fundamental human rights and freedoms.
"B-but Communism works in theory and only fails because of human error!"
What is this? A system for ants?
You are designing a system for humans and didn't take human error into account?
"Communism only failed because it fell to treachery and outside influence!"
If your system can't handle real world scenarios then the system is garbage and not fit for purpose
The point of a theory is to prepare for real world application, to foresee and foreplan for real world scenarios
In the case of technology it's things like rust, wear and tea/weathering or physical attrition, spillage or accidental damage
In politics it's things like corruption, sabotage, war, espionage, scarcity, natural disasters, sanctions and blockades, national security threats such as terrorist attacks, crime, invasions whatever
Let's say you own a building, a hospital for example, and a fire breaks out so someone hits the alarm. But oh no! A gurney is blocking one of the doors and people can't get out through that route and loads of people die
What do you tell the firemen inspecting the wreckage?
What do you tell the families of the deceased?
That your fire preparation system works in theory?
NO! MORON! You fucked up because you didn't prepare alternate routes of exit in the event that one is blocked, YOU FUCKED UP! THE SYSTEM WAS A FAILURE
There are absolutely inevitably problems that cannot be accounted for, if a dinosaur-wiping-level meteor hit, it wouldn't be the fault of capitalism, communism, whatever, but that's not the case here
That's why negligence is a crime, and why fault is determined in a long, drawn out trial in which you conduct discovery and analysis of the evidence: A purely theoretical, post-mortem analytical exercise in order to determine fault, in order to determine where things went wrong and why and what COULD HAVE BEEN DONE INSTEAD
If your line is that communism failed because of corruption, then it is communism's fault for not being corruption-proof enough as a system to function in the real world
Saying "it works in theory" is functionally the same as saying "it works in my imagination"
You failed to interrogate the idea enough to account for real world scenarios such as the ones you cite as the cause for communisms' fall, in the USSR, China, Cuba, wherever
But also 1. It doesn't fucking matter if a system "works in theory/fantasy" if it doesn't work in the real world
And 2. It doesn't even work in theory, as many have illustrated by critiquing it on its own terms, IN THE WORLD OF THEORY