@kimmonismus The window of arbitration and opportunity would probably be around 3-4 years. Never underestimate the inertia of the society and organisations.
@PeterDiamandis The future I want is the one where the relevancy is clearly visible.
It’s one where they understand what to delegate and what to keep human.
That judgment gap is where all the value will be.
As AI-generated slop floods our screens, the marginal value of new text is collapsing.
This is precisely why we must return to the classics. Classical works survived not because they were novel, but because they were dense: intellectually compressed, ethically serious, stylistically refined.
Homer, Thucydides, Ibn Khaldun, Shakespeare, Montaigne: these texts train judgment, not pattern recognition.
In an age where machines can write endlessly, reading the classics is an act of cognitive relevance: choosing depth over noise, formation over consumption, and wisdom over output.
It’s a crazy market. People are being laid off in large numbers and struggling to find new jobs.
Meanwhile, companies are unable to fill their vacancies. The gap between the workforce's skills and what is actually needed is huge.
In 4.4 billion years, the constellations we use for navigation will be gone. The sun will be thrown into a new orbit, and the Milky Way will be swallowed by Andromeda. This is what the end of a 13-billion-year legacy looks like.