Khandi

[Khandi @khandih627]

@diggi88409 @SamaHoole @Lanakila49 No, you do not. You look heathy.

[🍹 Princess Consuela Banana-Hammock @kimmie_c_]

Imagine thinking Sweeney & her glorious tits set women back when it's actually a bunch of pink hat "feminists" defending a mother who blames her hormones for filicide.

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌ @sappholives83]

When this little girl was ten, her father sold her and her niece, also ten, to a 60 year old man for $200. They were sold into muta’a, or “pleasure marriage,” a Shia Muslim concept in which a couple is temporarily “married” so that sexual activity can take place. In this case, the man in question was able to beat and rape two little girls without the expense of taking them into his household afterwards.

After the rapes, this girl and her niece ran away from their abuser. Unable to return home, lest they be sold and raped again, they now live under a bridge in Beirut.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is Islam.

[Tallow Twins | Skincare @Tallowtwins]

Now THAT is an icon.

[Briana Theroux @brianatheroux]

The Lindsay Clancy case has exposed something I find deeply disturbing about the way people talk about women, mental illness, and responsibility.

Three children were strangled to death by their mother, and somehow a significant number of women have managed to make her the emotional center of the story.

My position on insanity is pretty simple. I do not think insanity fundamentally changes the public safety question.

If you are capable of murdering three children because you are psychotic, you are dangerous.

If you are capable of murdering three children while completely sane, you are dangerous.

The mechanism may be different. The social consequence should not be.

Mental illness can explain behavior. It does not erase the behavior, resurrect the victims, or eliminate the danger that person has demonstrated.

Explanation is not exoneration.

For clarity, I am not in favor of the death penalty for anyone. That is a separate moral philosophy of mine. But I absolutely believe that people who demonstrate that they are profoundly unsafe for a functioning society should be removed from it.

And this was not simply someone impulsively snapping. There was organization and forethought surrounding what happened. Methodical, sustained planning is not a hallmark of an acute psychotic break. Planning alone does not rule out psychosis, but organized behavior, concealment, forethought, and apparent awareness of consequences are all highly relevant when evaluating the claim that someone had completely lost contact with reality. Lindsay displayed all of these.

You do not get to wave all of that away by saying “postpartum.”

And the hormone argument is even worse.

Hormones can influence mood, arousal, anxiety, aggression, sexual motivation, and cognition, often through the lens of preexisting beliefs. But influence is not compulsion. Hormones do not mechanically force people to murder.

If you genuinely believe they do, apply that logic consistently.

A man with high testosterone has biological influences affecting sexual motivation, dominance, and aggression. If he rapes or assaults someone, are you going to say his hormones made him do it?

Of course you fucking aren’t.

And you shouldn’t.

Because biological influence does not eliminate agency.

You cannot demand that women be treated as fully autonomous adults while simultaneously resurrecting the oldest argument imaginable about female biology making us irrational and incapable of controlling ourselves whenever accountability becomes uncomfortable.

And stop conflating postpartum depression with postpartum psychosis.

They are not the same thing.

Women experience postpartum depression every day without murdering their children. Using a woman who strangled all three of hers as some kind of martyr for ordinary women struggling postpartum is not compassionate advocacy. It is unbelievably poorly thought out.

If anything, you are giving vulnerable women another reason not to seek help. Imagine being scared to admit you are depressed, anxious, having intrusive thoughts, or struggling after birth because social media has rhetorically bundled ordinary postpartum mental health problems together with women murdering their babies.

Brilliant advocacy🤡

What disturbs me most is how quickly people can look at three dead children and start constructing a rationale for the adult who killed them. If that is your immediate moral instinct, something is seriously wrong with your priorities and mindset. Seek help yourself. Now.

You can advocate for better maternal mental health care. Please do.

But that does not require turning the person who brutally killed three children into a martyr.

Whether someone is criminally malicious or catastrophically insane, if they have demonstrated that they are profoundly unsafe for other human beings, society has every right to protect itself from them.

And let’s remember, the children should be the center of this story.

Not the woman who killed them.

[Allie Beth Stuckey @conservmillen]

The Lindsay Clancy support is why I use the term “toxic empathy” rather than “suicidal empathy.” Suicidal empathy is just one of the toxic forms of empathy, but it doesn’t describe much of what we see from liberal women today. The deep empathy they feel for Lindsay isn’t suicidal but homicidal. It does not endanger them; it endangers others.

Toxic Empathy is when you allow your deep feelings for one person to blind you to both reality and morality. So focused are you on the plight of one group or individual that you forget about those on the other side of the moral equation.

Toxic empathy feels so deeply for the pregnant woman in crisis that it ignores the rights and pain of the baby that’s murdered via abortion. It feels so deeply for the plight of the migrant that it ignores the victims of immigration chaos like Laken Riley. It is so overwhelmed by Lindsay Clancy’s emotional pain that it completely obscures the physical torture of three innocent children.

This kind of empathy - which plunges a person into irrationality - is not always suicidal, but it is always toxic. It makes fairness, objectivity, and justice very, very difficult.

[Becky Weiss @Becky_Weiss_]

Its not wrong.

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

Researchers at the Karolinska Institute put newborns face down on their mothers' bare stomachs after delivery and filmed what happened. Nobody helped. Within the hour, most of them had hauled themselves up the body, found the nipple, and started to feed.

The sequence turned out to be the same across every baby they watched, and it has since been documented in Sweden, Italy, Japan and the United States. Nine stages, always in the same order: a cry at birth, then stillness, waking, movement and a rest. Then crawling, using the legs to push against the mother's abdomen. Then mouthing and touching the breast, then feeding, then sleep.

The whole hour counts, resting stages included, which means a newborn who looks like he has given up is simply between steps and will start again.

None of this is learned. A baby in the womb has nothing to latch onto and no rehearsal. The equipment arrives assembled, which is ordinary in mammals and quietly astonishing in a species whose infants cannot hold up their own heads.

The finding changed delivery room practice, because hospitals had been taking babies away for weighing and cleaning during exactly that window. Later work found labour medication and separation both disrupt the sequence. Babies who miss it struggle more with feeding afterward.

An infant less than sixty minutes old, unable to see much beyond the length of an arm, knows where to go.

https://t.co/6cdG3JtBR5

[Micki way @mickitiki]

Strangulation takes up to 5 to 10 minutes until death. Lindsay Clancy did this 3 times to each child. Anyone who can do this to any child much less your own is a f**king monster. If you’re defending her then you’re a f**king POS degenerate. This is heartbreaking 💔😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

[Sassafrass84 @Sassafrass_84]

That’s a great point. Where do you draw the line? Don’t excuse horrible behavior.

[Dr Shawn Baker 🥩 @SBakerMD]

As some of you may be aware, we will likely be importing more cheap foreign beef in order to cut the cost at the grocery store for the consumers-this is likely a midterm election strategy as people don’t vote for incumbents when food is too expensive

The down stream effect of this is that it will likely cause many American ranchers to go out of business unless additional help is sent their way

In the mean time, if you can afford to do so, please buy directly from ranchers if you can-it might be the difference between them going out of business or surviving to keep on doing what they do the best in the world, producing high quality beef!

Share this if you’d be so kind!

[Shelby @ShelbyGrie]

Mind you, this evil vile creature was EIGHT MONTHS POSTPARTUM.

NOT THAT IT MATTERS, but she was not in the trenches of the newborn stage like everyone is suggesting. She also had a nanny. And her husband worked from home. And her in laws live close. And her parents live close. And she had access to therapy, meds & countless doctors. She was just evil. That’s it.

[John Hawkins @johnhawkinsrwn]

This is THE core reason so many people have mental health issues today. Too many people grew up being coddled to such an extent that they can't successfully navigate a lot of ordinary activities and conversations. So they live their lives anxious, afraid, and struggling to cope.

[Suneel Dhand MD @DrSuneelDhand]

I have now changed my mind on what should happen to Fauci.

I have been disgusted with him for a very long time, nearly lost my career because of his unethical mandates.

However, up until last week, I thought that there was little point in going the full way and prosecuting an 85-year-old (time and effort involved).

The release of his text messages yesterday, in which he clearly thought there was a risk to pregnant women for miscarriage— but chose to stay SILENT about that in public— has crossed a line for me.

Let this go the full way. Prosecute him. And if jail is the outcome, I’m totally OK with that.

Fewer things could be more horrific than a doctor willingly taking risks with pregnant women.

[Robby Starbuck @robbystarbuck]

A massive vindication for every parent who has endured coercive, horrific medical treatment for refusing to give their babies the Hep B shot, among many others. The child vaccine schedule had become an insane $ making machine. Today the recommendation shifts from 72 to 11 shots.

[Meli @DoodleTailTales]

🚨🐾 LOOK AT THIS CUTIE! EMERY #A658224 NEEDS HELP NOW! 🐾🚨

Just look at that face. ❤️ How is this sweet girl still waiting?

💔 EMERY #A658224
📅 Found as a stray on 6/23
🚨 NOW URGENT, High Risk 8/10 due to length of stay
🐾 6 years old, 50 lbs
⭐️ Heartworm Negative

Emery has been waiting far too long for someone to notice her. She deserves a family, a couch to nap on, and a place where she is loved, not a shelter kennel.

⏳ Please don’t let her run out of time.
🙏 PLEDGE
🙏 FOSTER
🙏 ADOPT
🙏 SHARE

One share could save her life. Please help Emery find her way home. 🏡❤️

📍 Harris County Pets
612 Canino
Houston, TX

#A658224 #SaveEmery #Adopt #Foster #PledgeForRescue #RescueDog

[Normal Gay Psychiatrist @NormalGayPsych]

I’m a gay man and a psychiatrist.
I’ve watched the explosion of rapid-onset gender dysphoria cases, especially in teenage girls.
I’ve seen the desistance data, the comorbidities, the regret, and the sterilizing effects of blockers + cross-sex hormones.
And I have never supported medicalizing children. Not once. Never.
Kids cannot consent to infertility, loss of sexual function, or permanent alteration of healthy bodies.
“Affirmation” is not neutral care — it is an ideological intervention that locks many of them onto a medical pathway most would have grown out of.
Being gay does not require me to pretend that sex is a spectrum or that a distressed 13-year-old girl is actually a boy. It requires the opposite: protecting same-sex attracted and gender-nonconforming kids from a medical fad that pathologizes them.
I will not shut up.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: WNBA faces mass calls to suspend DiJonai Carrington for the ENTIRE SEASON after she VIOLENTLY attacked Sophie Cunningham in the face and neck

"Was Sophie Cunningham targeted because she's white, because she's straight, because she came out and said biological men have no place in women against biological women in sports? It's probably all the above!"

"There needs to be REAL consequences here, guys. Not just some limp slap on the wrist, but an EXTENDED suspension to send a message that this will not be accepted if the league truly cares about protecting its players!"

"That was not just another hard foul. You and I grew up around here. We watched the Knicks in the 90s. We saw how hard they played on defense or even the Pistons with Michael Jordan. This was intentional."

"She's going right for her face. It was clearly meant to do physical harm. This has no place in any sport." @JoeConchaTV

[Glenn Reib @GlennReib]

Dear Sane America,

I could care less about basketball but somehow managed to watch the clips and I am now choking on the sheer volume of selective courage: White people are so utterly terrified of the magic word “racist” that they’ll watch a full-arm swing rearrange a woman’s face, see the immediate all-caps “WHITE PRIVILEGE” post, and still clutch their pearls in silence. Fuck that shit. And while we’re handing out participation trophies for honesty, I think Blacks are some of the biggest racists there are...Olympic-level specialists at spotting “privilege” the exact second the whistle blows against them, yet mysteriously color-blind when the forearm is flying the other direction.

Sophie Cunningham, bless her actual adult soul, is streaking in for a layup like a normal human being who still thinks this is a basketball game. Cue the full-arm special across the face and neck. She hits the floor, bloodies her lip, pops up like a damn jack-in-the-box, and walks straight at the artist formerly known as “competitive.” No flopping. No race card. No tears for the cameras. Just pure, unfiltered “I can take it, now get your shit off.” That’s how you carry yourself when the universe decides your face is public property. Absolute dignity. Absolute class. Absolute refusal to become the latest martyr in the never-ending pity parade.

Meanwhile her own coach, her own coach...practically writes a love letter to the player who just turned Sophie’s head into a speed bag. “Hard foul.” “I don’t think it was intentional to the neck.” “She’s gonna play her butt off, nobody’s walking in for a layup.” Aw, how sweet. Sophie gets the bloodied lip and the intentional forearm; Coach gives the benefit of the doubt, a glowing character reference, and a big wet kiss to the competitive spirit of the ejected one. Real team loyalty right there. Real backbone. Real “I’ve got your back…as long as it’s not actually your back.”

That hit wasn’t an accident. It was a masterpiece of subtlety, if your idea of subtlety is a sledgehammer to the face. Assault with a side of pure, uncut hate and jealousy. The toxicity in that league could power a small city. Some people simply cannot cope with certain players succeeding, competing, and drawing actual attention without shrinking into the background, so the arms start swinging and the race card gets played like it’s a get-out-of-jail-free token the second anyone notices. If the roles were reversed, the league would be holding emergency prayer circles, the media would be writing dissertations, and half the internet would be demanding multi-game suspensions, fat fines, and a full police report. Instead Sophie gets to listen to her own coach soft-pedal the whole thing while the rest of the audience stays quiet, trembling at the thought of being called a name. Sophie doesn’t need the theatrics or the victim costume. She takes the hit, stays on her feet, keeps her head up, and refuses to join the circus while everyone else loses their spine in real time. Stiffer consequences should already be carved in stone before someone actually ends up in a hospital. Until then Sophie’s still out there carrying herself like a grown woman. The rest of the cast can keep writing excuses, defending the indefensible, and hiding behind the fear of a label. The clips don’t care about your feelings. Neither do I.

[Blue Lives Matter @bluelivesmtr]

A local government has launched a WAR on a family-owned farm... and they NEED OUR HELP in EXPOSING this insanity.

A nearly 100-year-old Ohio family farm won its zoning case, then the county voted to keep suing them anyway.

The Garver Family Farm in Butler County has farmed the same land for nearly a century. They built a new market building to sell their produce, wine, and farm products.

Butler County zoning officials claimed the building was too commercial because it included a deli, bakery, and coffee shop, and issued a violation.

The family appealed. In March 2026 the Butler County Board of Zoning Appeals sided with them 4-1 and ruled the operation could keep its agricultural designation.

The county then appealed that decision to Common Pleas Court. In late July commissioners voted 2-1 to continue the legal fight.

The real driver appears to be money. Reclassifying the property as primarily commercial would strip the preferential Current Agricultural Use Value tax rate and raise the family’s property taxes on the building and land.

Owner Michael Garver has said the higher costs could put the multi-generational operation under.

A family farm that grows food and makes its own wine is being forced to keep spending money in court after already winning once.

This is what government looks like when it decides your success is a problem it can tax.

EXPOSE THIS.

#FamilyFarm #Ohio