Apostates are a threat to Islamic societies hence the ummah is justified in persecuting them because they are violating the social contract which is analogous to treason. ππ
@Twitter please can you help. I have delete my phone number in order to add an email add for backup instead and can't do that because I don't remember my password.
@Introsmiles They can't have it both ways. They can either show off alleged prophetic sayings where their Prophet would excuse behaviour of opponents out of mercy (like the lady who would apparently throw food at him) and accept burnings or not show off n roll as they so rudely are. Not both
@delventotime They do. But even if they didn't, maj wouldnt admit it. They'll pump it with support t make it look like a 'win'. If you are instructed to hate what Allah hates, and Allah's ruling for apostates is death, then as a Muslim in a non Muslim country, it's your duty to *at least* hate
This spat between the religious and the not does neither any favours. It makes the religious look not so tolerant - a fair reflection of religion but again does no favours - and makes the atheists look pretty and immature. Stick t content based intellectual convo or lose traction
@MicRighteous met you years ago, you were kind and humble enough to join us for a toke or two. You were also v honest of ahem rapping skills haha. I appreciated the honesty. Your music genuinely touches people in its own way. You deserve success, I mean that.
@MicRighteous It's all good mic, nothing personal in this game. You gave him yours and as long as your willing to accept a reply, probably won't happen, then that's enough. Your job was to body him and you did bro!
@MessyMug@xRyderxX@XGONDALX@mohammed_hijab Lol objective morality needs to come from an eternal source? Tf lmao do we even know gods exist? We simply need to set common goals to get objective morals. Not invisible beings lol. The goals could be subjective. Like religion.
I should add. Alot of ex Muslims seem to by default be OTT pro west. I love the west. That's not my point. But if you are going to dissect one subject so critically ie religion, and you should, your silence on other subjects will damage your/our credibility.
@zarakayk to but will always support that rights of those who do want to because it is after all just a book - irrelevant of what it means for some personally. What I don't support is threatening people, slander and humiliating an opponent's family. That is disgusting. 2/2
@zarakayk The mere fact that this is being asked says it's all. When something so simple becomes so apparently complex that we must ask ourselves ?s like these, the damage is already done. It's very simple, it's a book. It really is that simple. I wouldn't myself because I don't want 1/2
I personally will simply block anyone that resorts to cheap tactics. Very happy to have a sincere discussion with anyone. Love that actually. I dislike certain ideas. I don't have an issue with humans who I feel are victims of said ideas indoctrination.
2/2. Considering recent events, I would suggest disengagijg here on with anyone unable to appreciate the basics of a truly honest intellectual discussion as the tricks and ploys of some will never end.