Asim

[Asim @khiladinc]

@Deenresponds The story isn’t even authentic per the majority of NT scholars.

[Asim @khiladinc]

@TheFitnessFixer I hope all is well Dr. Bookspan. I haven’t seen any activity on your profile for a long time.

[Asim @khiladinc]

@turkishgrandpa @aamullanee ““Our Lord! Pour forth on us patience” [al-Baqarah 2:250]. 

“Our Lord! pour out on us patience, and cause us to die as Muslims.” [al-A'raf 7:125, 126] 

The Hadith is weak. If accepted, the context is probably a man choosing to make life difficult, thinking it was piety.

[Asim @khiladinc]

@KhalilAndani The phrase “what lies between their own hands” and “tossed it behind their backs” via the imagery captures the hatred and defiance of God’s decision to select a non-Israelite Prophet for his final message in a very pronounced way.

[Asim @khiladinc]

@KhalilAndani This emphasis is made over and over again in Surah Baqarah in particular to emphasize the extent of the enmity of Jews of that time regarding him (S), in particular because he wasn’t from their tribe.

[Asim @khiladinc]

@nevlak_ @ithinkitmyway @GodLogic_GL @InspiringPhilos @TaymiApologia @SeerahDawah What independently verified that Satan tested Jesus on the Mount when Jesus was the only one there?

[Asim @khiladinc]

@DrewPavlou

[Asim @khiladinc]

@AkramKarani @QuranDefence They technically did, when Morsi in Egypt won. But he was illegitimately overthrown.

[Asim @khiladinc]

@KerrDepression That’s an oral tradition, the “Hadith” containing elements of what “one” would acknowledge as a “truth” of that oral tradition. I’m pretty sure Yasser Qadhi wasn’t denying that “they” acknowledge that certain Hadith contain some historical truths, just like the Bible does.

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ And again, it’s niswa because ahl-bayt is masculine singular. As I said before, as you clearly don’t understand how grammar works, if we go by your “literal” logic via grammar, this can only refer to ONE person, not 4…. The absurdities you are engaging with are beyond absurd

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ lol.. direct reference to the mother is not implied, it’s directly stated. And it wouldn’t include male family members, because male family members don’t “foster” babies, as they don’t have breasts.. wild, how you can’t simply admit clear facts

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ “And We had caused him to refuse all wet-nurses at first, so his sister suggested, “Shall I direct you to AHL BAYT who will bring him up for you and take good care of him?”

So how is the mother of Moses AHL-BAYT if she is the ONLY addressee and FEMALE? That’s a rhetorical BTW

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ lol.. you are saying that he’s the primary one being spoken to. How so when he wasn’t even born and the angels were bringing GLAD TIDINGS to Sarah, meaning she was the primary addressee?

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ So now you have made 2 houses, 1 house and it’s not longer about the SINGULAR grammar of Ahl-Bayt..

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ You didn’t answer. You said it’s ONE house. That was just an attempt to save the grammatical argument of “ahl bayt”. When I said which house was Ali living in, you made up an excuse that Ali was part of that 1 house. Meaning it was no longer about grammar, but stories..

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ I’m not running. You are just making excuses up. You first said it was a grammar thing. That was shown to be complete wrong.

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ Salam to a person one is talking to is a du’a to the one who is being spoken to…. again, if ahl-bayt is SINGULAR masculine, by your logic Sarah can’t be included per your “school of grammar”…

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ lol.. how could Isaac be the one intended, if he couldn’t hear or talk yet or didn’t even exist yet?

[Asim @khiladinc]

@MuslimBin13574 @hashimiyy_ Are you saying the Quran lacks coherence?
You are the one arguing that the grammatical shift indicates another addresses.. is that “tartib” or are we on to another desperation attempt to try and defend your inherited opinions?