I just saw a video where jihadists in Syria crucify and kill a Christian man.
I'm not going to share the video here.
This is 1000 times worse than what the media is telling you.
Today, a number of prominent journalists criticised my suggestion that the UK media class has failed to sufficiently cover the rape gangs scandal, which will go down as one of the biggest scandals in our history
So, I decided to take a closer look at the data.
Trust me, you'll want to read until the end
First, the boring bit. How did I do it?
I used something called Lexis, a database researchers use to search content across UK newspapers
Every good researcher out there knows how to use it so they can duplicate my work and check
One of my critics today said my use of "grooming gangs" in my initial numbers was misleading because much of the coverage in UK newspapers uses "grooming gang" not "gangS".
OK then, let's use that
And let's just look at articles that are specifically about this scandal and don't just mention it in passing
What did I find?
Let's look at the years 2011-2025 because before that, even though the rape gangs scandal goes back decades, there was NOTHING in UK media.
Nothing.
They didn't touch it AT ALL --despite widespread rumours pushed by groups like the BNP and EDL
2011 is a crucial year because it's when renegade and HERO Andrew Norfolk, at The Times, started to write the first early pieces, despite abuse & harassment
First, let's look at ALL UK newspapers
In 2011-2025 there were 4,659 articles specifically focused on the "grooming gang" phenomenon
Wow
Sounds a lot right?
Remember the number.
"Grooming gang" = 4,659
But now let's compare that with how much coverage the media class gave to other scandals and terms
"white privilege" = 6,146
"anti-Muslim" = 17,152
"post office" and "horizon" =20,274
"extreme right" = 21,252
"Islamophobia" = 23,461
"Greta Thunberg" = 22,717
"expenses scandal" =25,585
"Stephen Lawrence" = 29,808
"anti-racism" = 34,484
"Windrush" = 35,515
"George Floyd" = 38,824
"Black Lives Matter" = 59,338
"Grenfell" = 71,422
"Britain" and "racism" = 75,693
"Net Zero" = 141,367
"far right" = 231,540
"racism" = 382,069
I could go on.
I think the numbers speak for themselves.
Relative to other scandals and amid a strong liberal bias in parts of the media class, the mass rape of young, working-class white girls & women just wasn't a priority
Yes, there were newspapers that broke the story and pushed it, like the Times in 2011
But even there, the 440 articles built around "grooming gang" between 2011-2025 is dwarfed by, say, the 2,868 on "Islamophobia", the 3,202 on Stephen Lawrence, the 2,603 on George Floyd, or the 5,524 on BLM
My point is not to bash individual newspapers but to say that relative to other race-related stories and debates, the rape gangs scandal --ARGUABLY THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN OUR HISTORY-- has received very little coverage from the media class
I'd give you the numbers for liberal progressive papers like The Guardian/Observer but frankly they're absurd
Oh ok then
Between 2011 and 2025 the Guardian had 113 articles on the grooming gang phenomenon compared to 3,325 for "Islamophobia"
What about the BBC?
We can look at BBC News 24 and BBC Radio 4
There were 357 specific mentions of the "grooming gang" scandal in BBC News/Radio 4 transcripts
Meanwhile, there were 7,537 for "George Floyd", 3,219 for "Stephen Lawrence", 7,416 for "Black Lives Matter", and 2,259 for "Islamophobia"
You get the picture. I won't keep going
But what I will say is this.
These girls were never a priority in Media Land
Relative to other scandals they were at first ignored and then downplayed
Too many of the middle-class, Oxbridge-educated, socially liberal if not radically woke progressive elites who control the parameters of what they think is our national "debate" routinely steer clear of scandals and issues that violate tightly-controlled taboos around immigration, multiculturalism, "diversity" in all its forms, and which are backed up with alarmist narratives about the "far right" and "Islamophobia" to warn others off from asking difficult questions or challenging the elite consensus in Westminster and London
This HAS to change
As I wrote in my Substack this morning, @elonmusk has done Britain a favour by forcing us to reckon with a truly NATIONAL scandal that has for too long been ignored and pushed to the side by political, media, and cultural elites in wider society
This past week, we have been pushed into a new era in which millions of people up and down this country are either learning about the rape gangs crisis for the first time or hearing shocking new details they did not know before and can scarcely believe
And millions of people are now asking some enormous questions. How did our country let this happen to our children? Why was it overlooked? Why did so many people stay silent? Is it still happening today? What can we do to stop it? Who is pursuing the truth in media? Who is naming and shaming? And why does the UK media class fall over itself when a single American man dies in Minneapolis while seemingly not giving a shit about the thousands of CHILDREN who have been abused, raped and harassed here in Britain?
The people have tuned into this scandal, in other words. They have taken notice and they are watching. The only question now is whether the media class has bothered to notice and will actually get on top of this scandal and push it to front of the agenda or continue to ask ridiculous questions like it did for much of today, deflecting from its glaring failures to instead obsess about Elon Musk.
Find the truth and tell us the truth.
That's your job.
He’s right. Methane from cows is part of a natural carbon cycle that after 10-12 years breaks down into CO2 and water. Grass absorbs the CO2 by photosynthesis and cow manure also improves the soil by acting as a natural fertiliser. The cycle then continues to repeat itself.
Sky News claims Retweeting could “potentially be a criminal offence” in the UK.
“However you think you’re acting innocently on social media, whatever platform it is, you are just sharing something…that could potentially be a criminal offense.”
This Scottish farmer expresses his concerns about how the government are neglecting the concerns of farmers. It’s time for governments to support one of the most vital industries of them all - farming. Our food supply depends on it.
#NoFarmsNoFood 🚜
Wise words from this Scottish farmer as number of farmers in Scotland start a tractor protest convoy against the government who are wilfully destroying the farming industry through neglect and restrictive policies.
#NoFarmsNoFood 🏴🚜
@TLRailUK so is there any compensation into how much cancellations there have been with Thameslink trains!!!????
It’s ridiculous - travelling from
Harpenden and St Albans has been aam absolute nightmare!!!! You guys need to sort hour choooo chooosss out!!!!! 🙄
@OliLondonTV For real?
You move to a country, you respect and integrate, full stop!
You don’t start demanding seeing your own people in every government department! You’re in a white country so respect it! Scotland has been the greatest friends of refugees and immigrants but this is too far!
The 🇦🇿 military is mocking an elderly Armenian 🇦🇲 grandma. How much of a vijvatsk do you have to be to do this, although it’s not surprising when this happens with the consent of our “faithful ally”. 🇦🇿 satkeluek!
Years ago, anthropologist Margaret Mead was asked by a student what she considered to be the first sign of civilization in a culture.
The student expected Mead to talk about fishhooks or clay pots or grinding stones.
But no.
Mead said that the first sign of civilization in an ancient culture was a femur (thighbone) that had been broken and then healed. Mead explained that in the animal kingdom, if you break your leg, you die.
You cannot run from danger, get to the river for a drink or hunt for food. You are meat for prowling beasts. No animal survives a broken leg long enough for the bone to heal.
A broken femur that has healed is evidence that someone has taken time to stay with the one who fell, has bound up the wound, has carried the person to safety and has tended the person through recovery.
Helping someone else through difficulty is where civilization starts, Mead said."
We are at our best when we serve others.
Be civilized.
Credit: Ira Byock.
🔶 Harvard University is launching its inaugural course covering Kurdish language and culture, responding to student-led advocacy with the "historic" announcement.
#HarvardUniversity - #Kurdishlanguage
https://t.co/YM8qqzRizO
UK to Ban Transgender biological men from being treated in female only sections of hospitals under new proposals put forward by the UK Health secretary.
Hospitals will also now have to use sex-specific language when it comes to treating women and will no longer be able to use woke terminology like ‘birthing person’ or ‘people who menstruate’ when treating women.
The new ban was announced by Steve Barclay, the UK Health Secretary who said:
“It is vital that women's voices are heard in the NHS and the privacy, dignity and safety of all patients are protected."
Source: Sky News
In 2017, Ashton Kutcher testified before the US Senate, getting emotional while addressing the issue of child sex trafficking.
His organization helped successfully rescue 6,000 victims of human trafficking, with one-third of them being children.
The movie "Sound of Freedom" sheds light on the disturbing reality of modern child sex trafficking, aiming to raise awareness and initiate meaningful discussions about this horrific crime.
As Ashton Kutcher mentioned during his testimony, "It has been happening for decades, but we are now just recognizing it for what it is."
Unfortunately, instead of embracing the film's message, the corporate media has launched a smear campaign against it.
Why would the corporate media invest so much effort in vilifying a movie that tackles the critical issue of child sex trafficking?