@NOYFB404@69Ryxn@secretsqrl123 It's literally been confirmed that they have lol.
They whacked an A-50 and TU-22 in the past at ranges at nearly double the range of the Patriot and S300. The S200 fits that bill.
@cabsav456 From a left leaning pov, ding ding.
Israel got away w/conflating antizionism as anti Jew bc technology hadn't caught up. It did and I think that goes w/younger conservatives rapidly turning anti Israel.
And AIPAC chirping Massie's primary L suggests they can buy our politicians
@BiancoRmbianco@cabsav456@RepLuna 10th Amendment says hi and makes the teeth of save unconstitutional garbage.
And you all only question certain wins but not others using the same machines and ballots for races dated for the same day. That's why many of us don't buy your BS.
@titopalmerjr@VoicesofWW2 They weren't in a position to initiate an invasion against Germany in 41. Would've been like Tannenberg
The mass encirclements didn't come from not entrenching, it was inept leadership & rigid command structure didn't allow lower & mid level leaders to take initiative rapidly.
@Alex_suprtramp@NoFilm_Analysis It's the best one imo. It generates values based on real trades and not just vibes. Its main tradeoff is that it doesn't update for notable factors affecting player value as quickly as other sites.
@tintin4christ@cabsav456 There have been ~80 cases of noncitizens successfully voting since 1999 with + 1 billion total ballots cast per the Heritage Foundation.
To the "muh states' rights" crowd, you should despise save.
Photo ID isn't the issue, the rest of save is 1984 like
@tintin4christ@cabsav456 Save is an existential violation of the 10th amendment. Running elections is up to each states provided they do not violate US Constitution amendments. Also violates the comandeering doctrine.
Plus the GOP for years railed against federalizing elections.
https://t.co/UEPVHbP1cX
I can't even deal with this.
For years — as long as I've been alive — conservatives (myself included) have resisted nearly every major voting rights or election administration bill Democrats have proposed, on the grounds that elections should not be federalized or centralized in any way.
Here are some direct quotes that speak for themselves:
Mitch McConnell:
- "We're talking about fundamentally the same bill… the plan to forcibly rewrite large portions of the 50 states' respective election laws… This is a massive federal power grab."
Ted Cruz (he has LOTS):
- "This is a power grab by Democrats in Washington to federalize elections and to take over elections in all 50 states. It is profoundly unconstitutional."
- "What Democrats are trying to do is seize control of elections from the states and put it in the hands of politicians in Washington. That is exactly what the Constitution was written to prevent."
- "This bill is about rigging the rules of the game. It is about Washington politicians deciding how Texans vote, how Floridians vote, how Americans vote."
- "The so-called For the People Act is really a federal takeover of elections. It strips states of their authority and centralizes power in Washington."
John Thune:
- "This legislation… attempts to federalize elections and rewrite election laws in all 50 states… This is nothing more than an attempted power-grab from the left."
Heritage Foundation:
- "The proposal that the federal government set new 'minimum' standards for state voter registration systems is a bad idea… another step toward the federal takeover of the administration of elections."
Federalist Society:
- "Election administration has always been primarily a state responsibility, and federalizing it threatens the balance of our constitutional system."
The SAVE Act would require states to use federal databases to verify citizenship and maintain voter rolls — effectively creating national oversight of voter data.
So can someone explain to me, on principle: when did federal overreach become okay with you, and why? Why are so many conservatives now supporting exactly what we have consistently argued against for decades?
This is simply not consistent with conservative principles, so it's really hard to see this as anything other than a power grab.
@DanielH16577898@MooreIAm The Ukrainians also have been busy striking other valuable targets too. As long as heavy transports can't be used on the road but especially the rail bridge, pouring major resources into attacking has a suboptimal cost benefit.
@dapapa69@RepDonBeyer Also no.
The nature of the election is irrlevant and what you allude is regarding compliance w/US constitution amendments (14,15,19, 24 &26)
Save is a backdoor violation of 24th and textbook violation of the comandeering doctrine which the SC has repeatedly sided with states.