Paedophile Jeffrey Donaldson is being held in the protection wing with those most at risk of being attacked in Gen Pop. That is: bent cops, police informers and paedophiles. With typical dark humour, the prisoners call the unit “peelers, squealers and feelers”.
@timcairns@JohnBoyHastings@Colin514540 “…my American team were really awful, and Billy Bingham came to watch me in a tour game at Hibs and we got slaughtered.” https://t.co/cmuvqHn3up
Imagine saving money for 5 years to finally see Rome, and when you get to the Trevi Fountain, you have to watch this....
Europe has no idea what they have done to themselves:
Can someone explain to me who chose Andy Burnham to be British Prime Minister? He wasn’t even an MP. He was given a seat and being crowned immediately as PM. This is absolute proof that the electorate are of zero relevance in this country. Anyone who still believes Britain is a democracy is extremely naive.
Can't believe I missed this.
How the HELL can the BBC justify spending licence fee payers' money on a helicopter to follow a sodding train that Andy Burnham in on?
This is blatant propaganda.
Outrageous.
@mcdermottkc_ The government are restricting Cash ISAs.
And are thus blocking the tax-avoidance activity of operating a Stocks and Shares ISA as a de-facto Cash ISA.
I'm really surprised you don't understand this.
It's only the interest on cash held in Shares ISAs that will be taxed at 22%.
Its part of the 'make more (especially young) people' invest agenda and has been long flagged. That's a good thing, its the way its being done that I and many others object to. This sits alongside cutting cash ISA limit for under 65s.
At least gilts weren't counted at 'cash-like'.
@PatrickChristys As always, its a tax on middle income people - meaning they never get ahead. Meanwhile; dole dossers & migrants get hand outs....the rich still get to remain rich.
How many Labour MP's would be in the 'rich' category I wonder?
@PolitlcsUK ISAs were introduced as a tax free account to encourage saving. Suddenly announcing they will now take over 20% of your savings proves how desperate they are.
The UK's skint. Labour want to take more of your hard earned money to give away to people who do not deserve a penny.
Are we morally obliged to keep feeding people who can’t feed themselves but continue to reproduce, creating exponentially more people who can’t feed themselves, and if so, is there a limiting principle to this?