Yeah. Turning Gaza into a joke or a dunk is grim.
People are dying. The other half of that is going dead silent on Sudan and Congo until somebody needs a counter-argument.
Then it only shows up as a gotcha. That silence is what turns it into a competition. If “actual people are dying” is the standard, it has to apply when the kids are African too.
I already said it’s not the tweets. Kids are dying in Sudan and Congo right now too.
Black genocides belong under “end silence on genocide.” A movement that drops them — while people in the US ignore the UAE pipeline to the RSF — isn’t ending silence.
It’s choosing which kids count.
Silence is turning it into a competition, when it should be a principle alongside it.
We can’t ignore this.
@nortnaib Cute. Pretend it’s about one tweet.
The actual issue is African genocides never enter the chat — and when they do, they still don’t get treated as serious by the same people shouting “never again” and “no silence on genocide.
@BlackIntifada You compared Americans to Europeans who watched Africa get slaughtered — then posted that Sudan and Congo only get mentioned to “complain about Palestine.”
That’s you ranking African deaths while using Africa as a prop. The selectivity you’re describing is yours.
@_awkuzu@alyia_tv@ferrorero Yasss Clock it Tobe!
The sidelining and silencing of genocide/s in a “no silence in genocide movement” has well and truly reached its expiration date.