This is Bryan. Once a week, he takes a shelter pup on a New York City adventure in his ‘Adopt Me’ backpack, hoping someone will fall in love. He films their big day out, and almost every dog he’s featured has found a forever home.
[ madmax_fluffyroad]
The Kiffness just released a new one in collaboration with @Sabazamenii
🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷
Go support him over on FB and give her a follow and support too. Time for the mullahs is ticking. Women, particularly, have been brutally attacked by the Iranian regime. https://t.co/rYFOrmY0ow
A CALL FOR PEACE
As Saturday fast approaches, a reminder, if you're coming to London, watch this video, show to everyone coming along.
Bring your smiles, flags, and patriotic pride.
No masks, open alcohol, or violence.
Politicians and legacy media want nothing more than to derail OUR movement.
Give them nothing.
Peaceful revolution.
See you all on Saturday 🇬🇧
Advance UK is delighted to welcome Aileen Quinton to our College. Aileen stands for patriotism, family, and freedom, values that will guide Britain’s renewal.
Join us today 👉 https://t.co/Jy7KZ6HHds
Right now, there are many deceptive food labels that disguise the horrors of factory farming. I just asked the UK Government to set out plans for ensuring consumers have Honest Labelling. Take action too! https://t.co/OKurXrPFWx
#HonestLabelling
Brittany Ferries have started transporting live farmed animals for fattening between Ireland and France. Take action too! #BanLiveExports https://t.co/wZqfYbPrV2
No, you are completely wrong in almost every aspect of what you have posted.
1. It has always been the correct interpretation in discrimination law that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ refer to material biological reality. The SC judgment makes it perfectly plain that this is an unbroken legal chain dating back to the very first sex discrimination legislation.
2. The purpose of the SC in this case was to rule on the fact that from the moment the Equality Act 2010 was passed the relevant terms relate to biology.
3. The reason why you and other commentators are mistakenly interpreting this decision as a change in the law with regard to trans rights is because you and many institutions have been lied to by activists about what the law has always been (notably by Stonewall and other activists groups) and you have all been only too happy to prioritise the demands for privileges from, in particular, men over the needs of women for privacy, dignity, respect, comfort, safety, fairness etc.
4. Men who identify as women have never had the ‘right’ to be considered as women within the meaning of the Equality Act and anyone who tells you otherwise is just wrong and has been misinterpreting the relationship between the GRA and the EA, often deliberately so.
5. Indeed, Harriet Harman is still getting the law wrong even after today’s judgment by wrongly claiming that excluding men who identify as women from female spaces needs some special, extra form of test to show that it is ‘necessary’ or ‘proportionate’.
6. In fact, once it is established that a single-sex female facility or space is deemed appropriate then it is, and always has been, lawful to exclude all men from those spaces irrespective of how they identify or whether they have a GRC. This is because for all matters covered by the EA, a man who identifies as a woman, ‘certificated’ or otherwise, is a man and can be excluded in exactly the same way as any other man. This decision is particular important as a safeguard for lesbians and their ability to meet and congregate without the predatory intentions of straight men masquerading as lesbians in a repulsive expression of corrective rape culture.
7. The decision has zero impact on the rights of trans people to the protection from discrimination and harassment that is afforded to them under the Equality Act be reason of the protected characteristic of gender reassignment and it is disingenuous scaremongering to suggest otherwise as you do here.
8. As you will see, no doubt, from other replies here, it is absolutely not the case that everyone agrees that a trans identified male is not biologically female. many claim that they are, in fact, biologically female whilst some recognise that they are not. India Willoughby even makes the absurd claim that he is female, has a cervix and is ‘more of a woman than JK Rowling’.
9. The issue about ‘gendered identities’ also requires further consideration. ‘Gender identity’ is a faith based, social science construct with no material basis. It is an entirely subjective notion with no objective parameters. The reason we know this is because there isn’t a person on the planet who can produce, for example, a comprehensive list of the objectively observable criteria - the traits, behaviours, characteristics and attributes - that make up ‘woman gender identity’. By all means make the attempt at completing this task yourself, but make sure it is truly comprehensive and fully explains what, exactly, it is that can make a man a woman.
10. Only female adults can be women and it is an absurd distortion of reality to claim otherwise. We know this because there is no other definition of women other than ‘adult female human’ that is not either circular/self-referential or derived entirely from regressive sexist stereotypes. You could have a go at that conundrum too if you like.
Womanhood is not a feeling or a costume that a man can cloak himself in however much his heart, his head or his euphoria boner tells him to the contrary.
Do the women of Manchester realise that their City Council has redefined ‘woman’ to include men, meaning it might well be acting unlawfully and discriminating against women? We need YOUR help to challenge this and to help protect female-only spaces #ManCouncilFailingWomen 🧵…1/
BE AWARE!!!!
It has come to my attention that there are all sorts of groups popping up on social media from out of nowhere and with really decent followings (in the thousands, even tens of thousands).
Some of these groups give the impression that either me or my team are behind them, or have sanctioned them, some have even arranged demonstrations.
Let me be clear, If I was to sanction anything or put my name behind any group or event I will do so here on X.
The likelihood is that I haven't and I wouldn't do that anyway given the circumstance. I am very busy sorting my own event for the 26th of October and preparing for the latest round of LAWFARE against me.
Know that there are many far left groups, far right groups (and almost certainly people linked with the British intelligence services) playing the usual games of infiltration, deception, and ENTRAPMENT.
It's not for me to tell anyone what they can and can't do, but I can say if I haven't put my name to it, then it's got NOTHING to do with me or my team.
Play safe and be mindful everyone, well meaning people could get caught up in something they know nothing about.
The usual cockroaches are crawling from under their rocks as I type this.
Absolutely wonderful news! The Animal Welfare (Livestock Exports) Bill has finally gonevthrough Parliament and will soon become law! @ciwf https://t.co/S6y2NhdqDP
Over the last four years, Hilary Cass has conducted the most robust review of the medical evidence for transitioning children that's ever been conducted. Mere hours after it was released to the press and public, committed ideologues are doubling down. 1/6
Uh oh, new evidence reveals the risks of Nueva Pescanova's octopus farm plans in Spain including risks to wildlife, the environment and public health. @PescanovaCorp needs to halt its reckless plans NOW. #StopOctopusFarming https://t.co/hRUdcpYGPo