I will not subscribe to pay X, like I used to, only to be shadow banned and have 2, to 3 views. Until this is resolved, I will NOT pay for a FAKE blue check mark.
🚨THIS IS JUDGE LORD JUSTICE TIMOTHY HOLROYDE
This is the judge who REFUSED Lucy Connolly her appeal after she was convicted for a social media post.
Meanwhile this very same judge CUT the sentence of Labour's Lord Ahmed by THREE YEARS after he was convicted of child sex offences. His sentence was reduced to just two and a half years from five and half years.
SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!
So let me get this straight.
Keir Starmer didn’t think the grooming gangs scandal warranted a new national inquiry.
He appointed Peter Mandelson, a long-time friend of Jeffrey Epstein, to a top diplomatic role.
And now he expects us to believe he wants to protect children from social media?
What he really cares about is digital ID. The under-16s ban is being used as the justification but it means EVERYONE will have to verify their age.
The ‘Stand up to Racism’ pro-migration group in the UK has used a picture of a little White girl with a Pakistani migrant in their campaign.
This is after hundreds of thousands of little White girls have been groomed, terrorised, tortured, gang raped & killed by Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs.
This isn’t just cruel, sick, deranged & twisted, it is EVIL.
I’m so done with this shit.
They are literally mocking & tormenting rape gang child victims now.
VPN restrictions? seriously. what the fuck is going on in the UK? just because someone uses a VPN doesn't mean they have something to hide. VPNs can be used for security purposes too. join a public WiFi network? turn on your VPN to keep your data secure? you're now a criminal.
The Rape Gang Inquiry - what happens next.
I intend to use my parliamentary privilege to name perpetrators and their enablers in the chamber.
This will be done incredibly carefully with our legal team involved every step of the way to ensure that no future prosecutions are jeopardised.
We are cooperating with the authorities in order to help cases be opened and reopened, but my faith in the system to independently deliver justice is not high...
That is why we are pursuing private prosecutions and civil litigation.
A target list has been identified, and it continues to grow.
This all has to be handled very carefully, for obvious reasons, but I am determined to act. We have had enough talk, now we need to act.
Our aim is straightforward.
Put people in prison. Deliver justice. Finally.
We will act. Not talk.
This is legitimately sickening:
> the sitting prime minister Keir Starmer presided over public prosecutions of thousands of rape cases
> he let **13,000** suspected rape gang members and pedophiles off with **warning letters**
> now that this information is blowing up on x, he is leading the charge to ban x
I knew it was bad, I didn't know it was this bad
It would be difficult to imagine a more evil and treasonous politician.
This is movie-level evil.
The social ban on under 16s is the diametric opposite of concern for kids welfare. So many teenagers rely on social media to communicate with their friends in the evenings. To take this away from them is vindictive.
If Starmer wants to effectively clean up inappropriate content on social media then he should discuss this with the social media companies rather than punish teenagers from communicating with their friends.
Starmer is once again using a virtue smokescreen to try and get what he really wants - a pathway to digital ID on social media - including adult verification. He is being horrendously manipulative here. And how dare he use the safety of children as the bait towards government controlled digital ID. Absolutely shameful.
Islamic iman with a gun inside a mosque:
“There is no better way of worshipping Allah than by killing an infidel.”
I don’t know about you, but I’ve never seen a preacher of any other religion act this way!
“One of the main problems in the countryside is dogs. Muslims don’t like dogs.”
Liberal commentator complains that the British countryside is racist and Muslims avoid going there because too many people walk their dogs, which are haram in Islam.
These people are truly insane.
I'm calling it now:
Rupert Lowe's rape gang inquiry will be declared "illegal content" by the British state.
They will then use the incoming Digital ID to track and arrest everyone who shares it. Thousands will go to jail for spreading the truth.
So let me get this ABSOLUTELY straight…
The public are being told facial recognition cameras, Digital ID and eventually digital currency are all about “security” and “safety”.
Meaning every payment, every document and every movement could one day be linked directly back to YOU.
But here’s the part hardly anyone talks about…
MPs and members of the Royal Family are reportedly exempt from parts of Digital ID systems for “security reasons”.
So the very people creating and supporting these systems won’t necessarily have to live under them in the same way as everyone else.
Ordinary people could end up being monitored through one vast digital network, while those at the top remain outside parts of it.
Whether you support Digital ID or oppose it, surely the same rules should apply to everyone.
Because the moment people believe there is one set of rules for MPs, the Royal Family and the political class, and another for everybody else, trust in government starts to disappear.
And looking around Britain today, it’s not hard to see why so many people are losing faith.
The real issue isn’t technology. It’s whether the people creating the system are willing to live under it themselves and if they aren’t then WHY and WHY should anyone else be expected to then.
Government spyware to be forced on your phone.
Facial scanning to access social media.
VPNs banned.
Army nudge units weaponised against the British people.
Police out of control.
Sacked advisors quietly rehired.
And still not one name from the Epstein list in prison.
This is what Starmer’s Britain looks like.
Resist. 🇬🇧
(image courtesy of @ForeverScept)