@cutelittlecocks@FlatjackEarth@fuchsiascended So that is the excuse for gooning to kids dawg.
A law should be followed and not to mention, if the loli content ain't part of the actual story it doesn't count. Turns out legal papers ain't the strong suit. Probably going for below legal in this case
@cutelittlecocks@FlatjackEarth@fuchsiascended Legally it is also considered that.
Also I suffered this as well. Sorry I don't want a piece of media to be ruined by people who like children.
I still have the legal papers from 2017.
@FlatjackEarth@fuchsiascended Is Lolicon Legal in the United States? https://t.co/fQnWa7town
Not protected speech if it is mainly sexual, that's the important thing.
@FlatjackEarth@fuchsiascended "For example, under the PROTECT Act of 2003, certain sexual depictions, including lolicon, can meet the federal definition of child pornography if they are obscene. Possessing or distributing such material could result in serious criminal penalties, including imprisonment."
@FlatjackEarth@fuchsiascended Twitter mfs trying to excuse literal pedophilia because they are fictional even though it is still bad to goon to children and still considered a form of csam: