Susan Larson

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@Momofabearkat @DefiantLs This! And yet we always hear the phrase “The American people want clarity.” Bull.

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@ronsterd89 It’s for coloring Easter eggs

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@ChrisMurphyCT You don’t even do anything for your constituents. You need to STFU!

[Carter Hughes @itscarterhughes]

Since December 29, 2025, two American pilots have been illegally detained in a Guinea, West Africa prison. The pilots were dragged off their plane after making a scheduled fuel stop in Conakry, the nation’s capital. According to flight logs and radio recordings, air traffic control had granted the pilots permission to land. What came next should not be tolerated.

Moments after landing, approximately 100 armed soldiers surrounded the plane with automatic rifles and armored vehicles. The pilots, who do not speak French, were forcibly removed from the plane and taken into custody. Guinea’s government accused the American pilots of entering national airspace and landing without authorization. Recorded ATC communications show clearance was given to the pilots and they had explicit permission to land in the country.

More than six weeks later, both pilots remain prisoners abroad. Guinea’s prisons are described as harsh dangerous conditions, including lack of electricity and running water, severe overcrowding, and inmates rotating sleep due to limited space. Three civilian judges have ruled the pilots committed no crime, and an appellate court has ordered their release yet the military has refused. The multi-million dollar U.S. registered Gulfstream IV jet remains seized by the Guinean government.

Pilot Fabio Espinal Nunez (from New Jersey) and Pilot Bradley Scott Schlenker (from Illinois) remain in a Guinea prison to this day. Their families are urging U.S. officials, including President Trump, to bring the pilots home and to send the Guinean government a message: Detaining American pilots is not tolerated.

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@ChrisMurphyCT @ChrisMurphyCT you are supposed to be representing me in government and you do nothing but bloviate about Trump. Please stop and do something for the people you represent.

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@Milajoy 39

[Terry Sater @sater_terry]

Senator Chris Murphy’s hysterical accusation that Defense Secretary Hegseth issued “illegal orders to murder people” is a partisan blood libel built on anonymous Washington Post leaks, not evidence, and it deliberately misrepresents both constitutional law and the law of armed conflict.

The President’s Article II authority to direct lethal force against narco-terrorists flooding America with fentanyl is plenary, unconstrained by any congressional prohibition, and fully consistent with the inherent right of self-defense; cartel gunmen on armed smuggling vessels are lawful combatants, not protected civilians, and neutralizing them, including those clinging to a burning boat, violates neither the Geneva Conventions nor customary LOAC.

Murphy, who never uttered a peep during Obama’s far more expansive drone campaign, now weaponizes selective outrage to delegitimize a duly elected administration, revealing himself as the same fear-peddling, Trump-obsessed hack who has spent 2025 shrieking that every lawful executive action is fascism incarnate. Like every other Democrat, Murphy cares more about drug cartel criminals than he does American citizens. This isn’t oversight; it’s a calculated attempt to erode civilian control of the military and sow chaos for partisan gain, and it deserves nothing but contempt. Murphy obviously sees himself running for president. He should be run out of the senate.

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@ChrisMurphyCT Why don’t you do your work for the people of CT whom you are supposed to be representing? You do nothing for us and yet tell us that we care about this trivial bullshit. Guess what Chris - we don’t! Now get out there and do your job instead of grandstanding!

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@Sadie_NC It’s a pond. CT

[Kaizen D. Asiedu @thatsKAIZEN]

Charlie Kirk didn't even believe in race.

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@ChrisMurphyCT Why don’t you worry about your state’s needs instead of this BS? DO YOUR JOB! You are a disgrace to the state of CT.

[mike bski @BskiMike22802]

Dear Senator Warren,

How absolutely fascinating to watch you deploy your signature strategy of attributing immediate economic effects to legislation that literally just passed! "Higher grocery bills," "higher medical bills," and "higher utility bills" from "Donald Trump and Republicans" – such sophisticated cause-and-effect analysis from someone who apparently believes economic impacts occur instantaneously upon bill passage rather than through complex market processes that take months or years to unfold.

CONSOLIDATED RUNNING TALLY OF COORDINATED DEMOCRATIC TALKING POINTS:
APOCALYPTIC RHETORIC: "dark day/bad day" (Alsobrooks, Pelosi, Omar, Sanders, Jayapal), "death sentence/people will die" (Sanders), "largest cut in history" (Sanders, Pelosi, others, Beyer), "they will remember this day" (Klobuchar), "act of violence/deadly budget" (Tlaib), "worst legislation of our time" (Beyer) = 14 INSTANCES
BILL BRANDING: "Big [Negative Adjective] Bill" (Jayapal's "Big Bad Betrayal Bill" TWICE, Pelosi, Omar), "piece of shit" (Beto), "One Big Ugly Bill" (Beyer), "Big Ugly Bill" (Padilla), "Big Beautiful Bill" (Warren mocking) = 8 INSTANCES
BETRAYAL/SELLOUT RHETORIC: "betrayal" (Jayapal TWICE, Alsobrooks, Pelosi, Jacobs), "sellout" (Crockett), "heartless/cruel/shameful" (Underwood), "abandoning morals" (Omar), "betrayed the people" (Tlaib), "ultimate betrayal" (Padilla) = 10 INSTANCES
WEALTH TRANSFER NARRATIVE: "transfer of wealth to rich/tax breaks for billionaires/wealthy" (Omar, Hirono, Alsobrooks, Jayapal TWICE, Pelosi, Omar again, Sanders, Omar third time, Klobuchar, Tlaib, Padilla, Warren) = 13 INSTANCES
FALSE HEALTHCARE NUMBERS: "17 million losing healthcare" (Omar, Underwood, Tlaib, Padilla, Warren), "millions losing healthcare" (Omar again, Klobuchar) = 7 INSTANCES
DICTATOR RHETORIC: "wannabe dictator" (Omar) = 1 INSTANCE
ELECTORAL THREATS: "vote them out" (Beto) = 1 INSTANCE
CITATION OF ADVOCACY GROUPS: Beyer citing CBPP and SEIU claims = 1 INSTANCE
EMOTIONAL APPEALS: "I'm angry" (Warren) = 1 INSTANCE
IMMEDIATE CAUSATION CLAIMS: Warren blaming current prices on just-passed legislation = 1 INSTANCE

Elizabeth, this is your SECOND appearance with false claims! You're really committed to this coordinated script, aren't you?

Let's examine your fascinating claim about immediate causation first: HR1 just passed the House. Economic effects from legislation typically take months or years to materialize through implementation, regulatory processes, market adjustments, and business planning cycles. ARE YOU SERIOUSLY CLAIMING that grocery stores, medical providers, and utility companies analyzed HR1's provisions, determined the economic impact, adjusted their pricing models, and implemented price increases – all within days of House passage?

This is either spectacular business efficiency or you're attributing unrelated price increases to legislation for political theater. Which is it, Elizabeth?

WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE that current grocery bills, medical bills, and utility bills are the result of HR1? Did these businesses issue press releases saying "We're raising prices because of the bill that just passed"? Or are you simply taking unrelated price increases and blaming them on legislation you oppose?

This is precisely the kind of misleading attribution that destroys political credibility. You're literally using current economic challenges – which affect real families – as political props without establishing any causal relationship.

Now let's address your specific claims:

"HIGHER GROCERY BILLS" Which specific section of HR1 raises grocery prices? The bill doesn't address food pricing, grocery regulations, or agricultural subsidies that would affect grocery costs. Food price inflation has been occurring for years due to supply chain issues, energy costs, and Federal Reserve policies – none of which are addressed in HR1.
"HIGHER MEDICAL BILLS" This is the opposite of reality. The bill actually EXPANDS healthcare savings through Enhanced Health Savings Accounts with higher contribution limits (Sections 110201-110213, Pages 976-980), extends HSA eligibility to Medicare Part A recipients, and allows HSA spending for fitness and wellness programs. How does expanded healthcare savings cause higher medical bills?

"HIGHER UTILITY BILLS" Which specific section of HR1 affects utility regulation or energy pricing? The bill doesn't address public utility commissions, energy markets, or utility rate structures that would affect utility bills. Energy price increases have been driven by supply chain issues, geopolitical factors, and regulatory policies – none of which are modified by HR1.
HERE'S WHAT YOU CAN ACTUALLY THANK YOURSELF FOR – VOTING AGAINST ALL OF THIS FOR MASSACHUSETTS FAMILIES:

TAX RELIEF YOU VOTED AGAINST FOR MASSACHUSETTS FAMILIES:
Permanent middle-class tax cuts including lower brackets and doubled standard deduction (Sections 110001-110004, Pages 961-962)

Tips exempt from taxation – helping Massachusetts restaurant workers offset higher costs (Section 110101, Page 972, Line 3)

Overtime pay exempt from taxes – providing more take-home pay amid inflation (Section 110102, Page 972, Line 12)
Enhanced standard deduction for seniors struggling with fixed incomes (Section 110103, Page 972, Line 20)
Car loan interest deduction – helping with transportation costs (Section 110104, Page 972, Line 25)
Enhanced child tax credit made permanent – helping families with rising costs (Section 110004, Page 962, Line 6)
HEALTHCARE EXPANSION YOU VOTED AGAINST FOR MASSACHUSETTS FAMILIES:
Enhanced Health Savings Accounts with higher contribution limits to offset medical costs (Sections 110201-110213, Pages 976-980)
HSA eligibility extended to Medicare Part A recipients (Pages 976-980)

HSA spending allowed for fitness and wellness programs (Pages 976-980)
Expanded healthcare savings options to help Massachusetts families afford medical bills (Pages 976-980)
So let me understand your position, Senator: permanent tax cuts for working families somehow raises grocery bills, exempting tips from taxation increases medical bills, enhanced healthcare savings raises utility bills, and providing more take-home pay for families struggling with inflation somehow makes their economic situation worse?
You either didn't read HR1's 1,000+ pages and are just attributing unrelated economic challenges to legislation for political theater, aren't smart enough to understand basic policy provisions that directly help your constituents cope with rising costs, or are deliberately deceiving Massachusetts families about legislation that would put money in their pockets and expand their healthcare options. Which is it, Elizabeth?
THE REAL CAUSE OF HIGHER BILLS IS THAT YOU VOTED AGAINST:

Tax relief that would give Massachusetts families more take-home pay

Healthcare savings expansion that would help families afford medical costs

Tip tax exemption that would help service workers keep more of their earnings
Overtime tax exemption that would reward hard work with higher take-home pay
Enhanced child tax credits that would help families afford rising costs
Perhaps between your immediate causation claims and your unsubstantiated price attributions, you could explain to working families in Massachusetts why they don't deserve more take-home pay through tax relief, enhanced healthcare savings to offset medical costs, and expanded economic opportunities to cope with inflation.
Massachusetts families deserve better than senators who blame current economic challenges on just-passed legislation without establishing any causal relationship. The real cause of families' economic struggles is having representatives who vote against tax relief and healthcare savings that would help them cope with rising costs.
Your attribution of current prices to just-passed legislation is particularly ridiculous when you provide no evidence of causal relationships. Stop using families' economic challenges as political props, Elizabeth. Provide evidence or stop making false claims.

The real "Big Beautiful Bill" effect would be families keeping more of their earnings through tax relief and having expanded healthcare savings options – which is exactly what you voted against.

#ReadTheBill #WarrenFalseCausation #MassachusettsDeservesBetter #WorkingFamilyTaxRelief #ProtectVulnerablePopulations #TipWorkerRelief #HealthcareSavings #HR1Truth #BigBeautifulBill #ImmediateCausation #MaintainAllProtections #CiteYourEvidence #FactsOverAttributions #ServeMassachusetts #ActuallyReadLegislation #VotedAgainstWorkingFamilies #StopUsingFamiliesAsProps #WhereIsYourEvidence

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@Ravious101 Best panel ever was with her, Jesse, Dana, Greg and Judge Jeanine. The Judge just didn’t put up with anyone’s BS. I miss her on @TheFive!

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@ElonMuskNews47 Hi

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@musk_news13 Yes absolutely.

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@ElonMuskNews47 Yes and thank you very much for doing so! Most Americans appreciate you and the work you’ve done!

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@FanJDVance Men

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@musk_news13 Yes I support DOGE wholeheartedly.

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@PunditParanoia @MeidasTouch On taxpayers dollars…

[Susan Larson @kithsu]

@Rootinforthe9s1 @FOX61News Agree.