@kochuthresiya@Nairhistory Finding a good-looking Nasrani is like finding a needle in a pile of feces. John Abraham’s father is the only such person I have seen.
@lifeisPandC Its kinda interesting how the Brahmins have controlled the narrative. South Indian Brahmins are like 47% S-Indian on average on HW but somehow they manipulate qpadm to show that they're somehow only 36-37% Onge-like on avg. very odd
@Pajeet_landd@padh39892 The runs on the left are utter nonsense. How are Punjabi Brahmins 20+% less AASI than Telugu Brahmins when their HW ASI values are 15% apart? You have nothing to prove that Telugu Brahmins are 43-44% AASI.
@Pajeet_landd@padh39892@lifeisPandC Your obtusity is appalling. You’re comparing qpAdm runs on a given model to a G25 Illustrative run known to inflate AASI by eating up other components. At least standardize the tool you’re using to compare.
@lifeisPandC@padh39892@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd I disagree though that 50+ SI Brahmins form a genuine cluster. That kit you keep citing is obviously very AASI-shifted for a SIB, yet I keep seeing accounts on here claim it is typical. I haven't seen any other SIB kit with 50+ SI.
@lifeisPandC@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd And what I also don't understand is why your claim about Purvanchal region being undersampled isn't also applicable to SW Brahmins. There is a Shivalli kit from Udupi with <41 SI, do you really think Havyakas/Shivallis/Nambudiris couldn't possibly go under 40 SI?
@Pajeet_landd@lifeisPandC That is IllustrativeDNA. Totally different from HarappaWorld. Why are you posting in this thread if you don't even know the difference?
@lifeisPandC@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd You had asked for high SNP SW Brahmin kits to justify my claim that that Nambudiri with 44.66 SI was not particularly Western-shifted for his region, so I shared all the high SNP kits that I had with you in DMs. But you blocked me.
@lifeisPandC@padh39892@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd I don't give two craps about Rajputs. I don't think any of the users in this thread did until you came along and started posting incessantly about them.
@lifeisPandC@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd Look, I don't have anything against you. Never did. I actually admire your efforts to challenge bias in South Asian genetics spaces, which has held us back from understanding our communities better. I just don't understand why you keep dodging conversation with me.
@lifeisPandC@Pajeet_landd@Gonetoosoon23 Even if we take his "estimate" of SIB's AASI, you get a split of 42-15-42 AASI-Steppe-Farmer. Just as much Farmer as AASI. I only brought up other communities here because his original comment was a comparison to North Indian UCs.
@lifeisPandC@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd "Obsessed"? Rich coming from a guy like you, whose instinct is to block those who try to challenge his claims with evidence.
@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd@lifeisPandC That's fine as long as the same logic is applied to all communities. Typical range of East UP/Bihar Brahmins should be 36-39 AASI. Gangetic Rajputs would be 38-42 AASI. And Punjabi Brahmins, 28-32 AASI.