The line is drawn when a new genetic code is generated, i.e. when the sperm meets the egg. Human life with unique DNA from a mother and father is precious. Sperm, or, an egg itself does not have the same potential to be a human, until they meet and create a new unique genetic code. Aborting this new creation is exterminating it from existence forever. That is mortally impermissible
@AlexSearing Biden caused the mess we are in right now. This is what happens when you disincentivize people from working, stop American energy production, all while sending 40+ billion dollars to another country
@RobAnderson2018 False. โArmsโ encapsulates weapons necessary to fight against tyranny. At the time those were muzzle loaders. The forefathers obviously knew society would advance technologically which is why they used the umbrella term โarmsโ and werenโt overly specific
@ranaethevirgo@PolitiShox @GoodLittleWolf Either way, itโs developing human life with its own unique DNA that is being terminated for all of eternity by aborting it. Thatโs wrong morally. Legally speaking, I donโt agree with overturning Roe V. Wade. Everyone should have freedom.
@terrybrozier @nascakess @Bellsintern @hoeglizzy We agree on a lot more then we first realized. Iโm for freedom over the government enforcing what it deems best. Iโm pretty sure we just disagree on the morality of abortion and thatโs what Iโm trying to discuss with you.
@terrybrozier @nascakess @Bellsintern @hoeglizzy Yeah you have been far off this whole time and still havenโt responded academically to any of the premises. Legally they ought to have the right to choose. But making that choice is the morally wrong decision in almost every situation
@terrybrozier @nascakess @Bellsintern @hoeglizzy Roe Vs. Wade being overturned restricts people from making their own decision. So I think itโs a bad policy. You should legally be able to do whatever you want. Abortion is morally a terrible thing. Thatโs my point
@terrybrozier @nascakess @Bellsintern @hoeglizzy We should have the freedom to do whatever we want. If you want an abortion, get one. If you get one, however, thatโs morally a terrible thing outside of those 3 cases. This is what Iโm saying. Nothing else
@terrybrozier @nascakess @Bellsintern @hoeglizzy The point is that you are making my argument out to be something it isnโt before preceding to โtake-downโ my argument. Respond to my actual argument. I DMโd it to you
@terrybrozier @nascakess @Bellsintern @hoeglizzy No because that would be called lying. Lying is bad. Ending pregnancy after conception is wrong is the point. You need to respond to the moral argument
@terrybrozier @nascakess @Bellsintern @hoeglizzy Yeah obviously they should have the ability to make their own decision. But when they make that decision, they are making the wrong one. For clarity my argument is a moral argument and you have not responded to it philosophically.
@terrybrozier @nascakess @Bellsintern @hoeglizzy The only scenarios that are within reason are cases of rape, incest, and if bearing the child will kill you. All other scenarios are far too poor. Iโd like you to give me an example other than these cases where itโs ok