Theo Von gets personal on his podcast and reveals he wishes he had a wife and kids to come home to.
He says he��s losing “motivation” and that there is “not a ton to do” to keep him engaged.
“I think I kind of wish that there was like a family aspect in my life right now, like a wife and children. But that’s not there.”
After 20 years of stand-up and reaching Joe Rogan-level success in podcasting, what Theo wants most now isn’t more money or fame. It’s a family.
if you look around at everything happening and your conclusion as to why people are becoming more radicalized is still some shit like “andrew tate” and “podcasters” you should be wearing a helmet 24/7
We’ll see how much diversity of expression the Labour government believes in when they ban X.
We’ll see how much these socialists believe in suppressing and censoring the Voice of the People.
We’ll see how little these authoritarians believe in free speech.
Food is a human right only in the sense that anyone is free to use their material and labor to produce and harvest it.
But that’s not what socialists want. They want others to fund the material and labor and provide them the end result for free.
Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase:
"We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament.
No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good.
So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily.
Can you prove it? No.
And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident.
That is not an accident.
And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that.
The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on."
@BretWeinstein