Four million transactions in the first week of Robinhood Chain testnet.
Developers are already building on our L2, designed for tokenized real world assets and onchain financial services.
The next chapter of finance runs onchain.
Looked into what $Rei @rei_labs been up to
The team been locked in for the last year working on their own core ai architecture doing constant upgrades
Should be exiting stealth soon releasing catalysts…if they actually do deliver what I m reading this will be trading way higher in few weeks
100x+ potentials depending on how they execute
I’ll state it clearly once more: the big players won’t let this one pass.
If this were a regular launch, $CRED would already sit at least $150M market cap. Because it launched on @MetaDAOProject as ownership coins, institutions and retail have nearly identical entries. This is going to run beyond $300M in comparison with its competitors imho.
Out of these 4, only $CRED thats still $15M mcap.
And @crediblefin is the only ownership coin.
Volatility is expected on this early stage, but big players won’t let it slide fs.
One day you’ll wake up and realize the chart was always out of reach.
The prep work was happening behind the scenes, and it still will. Let aside the entire market, the team will place that order before you do.
The longer the silence lasts, the more you accumulate $WALLET
The day Vlad's X account gets compromised + token launched through it, RH account warns X instantly
It's been two weeks since someone launched a token using a wallet funded by Vlad and there has been nothing from anyone at RH
You have no idea how bullish this is for $wallet
Is $WALLET going to be the “i could have held” for you?
I had $3,600 of Shib in its first week of existence. I sold for a 2x.
I had $2,000 at the absolute bottom of Bonk. I sold for a 3x.
I will not do it this time.
best read as classic corporate risk management post after a messy incident, especially when the infrastructure of the token is still in progress.
“Issued” terms here include distribution.
While the wallet token was already distributed during the initial set-up, as treasury wallet of $90B company implemented that, this also means vlad’s post will eventually need to be corrected and justified to authorities, as onchain data shows immutable proof that RH has created and distributed $wallet token after deployment.
gm.
Day 15 since $WALLET was created on Robinhood Chain.
The market cap dropped from around $5M to $2.2M after @vladtenev account was hacked and someone used it to promote a meme token and make a significant amount of money.
Then Vlad posted that Robinhood had not issued any coins or tokens - and paper hands started selling, pushing the price even lower.
https://t.co/tkxTcsRxdg
But let's think about this for a second.
Before Vlad's tweet, the on-chain evidence was pointing toward a connection between $WALLET and the Robinhood ecosystem.
Did the blockchain suddenly change after Vlad's tweet ?
Did the $WALLET history change ?
Did the funding transactions disappear ?
No.
So why are people acting as if the on-chain evidence suddenly became irrelevant ?
Stop spreading random rumors about who created $WALLET.
The on-chain evidence strongly suggests that the creator is connected to the Robinhood ecosystem.
Now we are simply waiting for an official announcement to understand the real purpose of $WALLET.
Regarding Vlad's tweet, I think the wording is very carefully chosen:
- “In case it wasn't clear, Robinhood has not issued any coins or tokens. Stay safe out there.”
He said “issued.”
He did not say: “Robinhood has not created any coins or tokens.”
Those are two different statements.
Personally, I remain a believer.
Why?
1️⃣ The trading fees are still unclaimed.
2️⃣ The contract involved in the token launch may have been frozen or restricted in some way.
I'm still verifying this information, so DYOR.
3️⃣ $WALLET is still hidden in the official Robinhood Wallet app. You cannot find it by searching for the token name or contract address.
4️⃣ Whales continue to accumulate.
There has been no obvious mass selling from the largest holders after today's FUD.
I also added a little more to my bag.
The blockchain hasn't changed.
The story hasn't changed.
Only the market sentiment has changed.
Good luck, $WALLET holders. 👀
Very happy to be part of this community!
"A Neolab is a pre-revenue scale startup working on long-term AI breakthroughs, usually with a $1B+ valuation. There are now 63 of them! " - @deedydas
Reminder that base:0x6b2504a03ca4d43d0d73776f6ad46dab2f2a4cfd is due to exit stealth any day now.
Have very clearly outlined here why they should be valued alongside the likes of Ndea.
the alpha is in the timing
robinhood chain just crossed 1.1m users, launched tokenized stocks through arcus, and is integrating full defi rails with morpho and maple
if they're freezing AA33's fee claims now, it's because they're preparing to formalize WALLET as native infrastructure before the ecosystem gets too big to reshape cleanly
sequencer control lets them set the token mechanics they want without governance theater or onchain votes
coinbase is racing to launch tokenized equities on base too, reported 14hrs ago. robinhood needs their own agent token locked down before that competition intensifies
the move makes sense if WALLET becomes the gas/incentive layer for their 200+ tokenized stocks and 24/7 markets
robinhood controls the sequencer so they can freeze specific contract functions without leaving onchain evidence
they're preventing AA33 from claiming fees on a token they deployed, which only makes sense if robinhood is preparing to take formal ownership of $WALLET as their native agent token
sequencer-level control lets them shape token mechanics before making it official
robinhood controls the sequencer so they can freeze specific contract functions without leaving onchain evidence
they're preventing AA33 from claiming fees on a token they deployed, which only makes sense if robinhood is preparing to take formal ownership of $WALLET as their native agent token
sequencer-level control lets them shape token mechanics before making it official
Out of these 4, only $CRED thats still $15M mcap.
And @crediblefin is the only ownership coin.
Volatility is expected on this early stage, but big players won’t let it slide fs.
@Saint10Fourteen dude loaded a wallet with $30M and just copied me on my last 4 trades, he bought $PUMP $CRED $ANSEM & he's also holding $MET which has been main beneficiary of the community LP
ppl gonna start saying this wallet is me again lol
The reason I’m betting on $wallet is simple: onchain findings lead the initial discussion, not giant influencers hype.
+I refuse to miss the boat if this turns out to be the utility token for newly introduced chain by a $90B company.
fafo i guess. gm
$Wallet
0x0339f5459fc690ac85f1782e15782a151b4a9e1b
Its time for a good recap of the blockchain evidences.
1/
It is undeniable that the RobinHood Chain build team has been quietly building on Robinhood Chain since block 34 before launching $Wallet
I traced every wallet. Every transaction. Every partner.
Here's what i found, and why it matters for $Wallet
2/
Start with the $WALLET token deployer:
0x542718C390Ef1E4bEB46ce2023FfaA627db8aa33
This isn't a wallet that woke up on July 10 and launched a token.
It spent months as an EIP-7702 smart account running systematic testing:
→ USDG payment settlement via RobinhoodSettler
→ Cross-chain bridge tests via LiFi
→ LP provisioning and management
→ Smart account QA across multiple contract interactions
77 transactions. 401 token transfers. All before launch.
The token was the last step. Not the first.
3/
Who funded the deployer?
0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649
This address has been active since block 34
The fourth block ever mined on Robinhood Chain.
Its first counterparty? A wallet connected to Paxos infrastructure.
Paxos is the regulated blockchain infrastructure company behind USDG — the stablecoin powering Robinhood Chain's settlement layer.
The chain's funding trail starts at block 34 and connects directly to regulated financial infrastructure.
4/
Go one level higher and it gets more interesting.
0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649
0x0829D37dbC25799F7cFf04B5AaCda94e8761a75a
Look at both addresses side by side.
Same middle segment. Generated together deliberately.
These are vanity addresses
Robinhood's internal master treasury system.
0x0829 sent 19.5 ETH to 0xF718 in 8 tranches.
No other source. No other destination.
This is the org's on-chain wallet hierarchy.
5/
From that same distributor 0xF718, ETH flowed to 84 wallets across 9 coordinated funding sessions
Multiple wallets funded in sequential blocks, seconds apart.
Every major piece of infrastructure on Robinhood Chain traces back to this single source.
Including everything Chainlink built.
6/
During the private build phase, the full Chainlink stack was deployed on Robinhood Chain:
→ 887 transactions deploying live price feeds
→ 25+ DualAggregator + EACAggregatorProxy contracts — one per asset
→ Price feeds live for NVDA, TSLA, AAPL, DELL, DDOG, SHOP, SPY, QQQ and more
→ Chainlink node operators individually funded and configured
→ ChainlinkSVR DApp infrastructure deployed
All of this was running before $WALLET launched. Before any public announcement.
7/
Then the CCIP testing.
68 ccipSend calls on Chainlink's Router contract — cross-chain messaging tests run repeatedly across May 27-29 and June 1.
LINK tokens held for CCIP fees.
Robinhood wasn't just integrating Chainlink price feeds. They were testing the full cross-chain messaging stack.
The infrastructure needed to move tokenized assets between chains.
Proof:
https://t.co/Gw7g2CpT5F
8/
The wallet that paid for all of this Chainlink work?
Funded by the exact same distributor 0xF718 that funded the $WALLET deployer.
Funding proof:
https://t.co/QtnY6Rc6dB
0xebaba46ae099dcf49567374df6f6746b1580ce0f0304a430b1509c93c1db6d90
One treasury. One operation.
9/
The other partners confirmed on-chain from the same treasury:
LiFi: entire bridge contract suite deployed at block 234, 6 days after chain launch. 33 CREATE3 deployments, 5 diamondCut calls.
Funded by Robinhood's treasury from day one.
Relay Protocol: solver wallet seeded by Robinhood treasury. Processing 556+ ETH in cross-chain fills in real time. 1,500+ transactions in a single day.
Across Protocol: SpokePool present and active on chain.
Uniswap V3/V4: DEX infrastructure deployed and configured.
Not third-party integrations.
Pre-arranged, treasury-funded partners.
10/
And the synthetic stock trading system was already live before launch:
→ Tokenized NVDA, TSLA, DELL, DDOG, SHOP, APLD, SNDK deployed
→ Wrapped versions for settlement: wNVDA, wTSLA, wDELL and more
→ 5 automated swap bots running continuously
→ settleWrappedToken called thousands of times daily
→ Price oracle pushing real-world equity prices on-chain every 3 seconds
$WALLET launched into a fully operational financial ecosystem. Not a testnet. Not a concept.
11/
What does this mean for $WALLET?
The URL https://t.co/GbdWTeHbGS is hardcoded in the launch transaction calldata — on-chain, permanent, immutable.
The deployer wallet was funded by the same treasury that built every piece of this infrastructure.
The token launched after months of systematic testing, partner onboarding, and infrastructure deployment.
It is undeniable that this was created by the RobinHood Chain build team.
I’ve never been this sold reading onchain thesis for an unannounced token.
If it really plays out, $WALLET could retire a lot of us from crypto. If not, well, we keep playing.
Simple.