kosa

Gratitude is a must 8️⃣

[Davido @davido]

CR 7

[Zeus @ice_z3us]

✨ Even though it is Sunday, I have personally spent more than 20 hours yesterday and today making sure everything is prepared for Monday.

I am honestly very hyped about tomorrow.

The next two weeks are extremely important for us and, in many ways, they will help define the future direction of $ION.

For those of you who have ever run ads or marketing campaigns before, you will understand what I mean when I say this: promoting Online+ through platforms like Google, Meta, and other major advertising networks was extremely difficult because of the nature of the product and its connection to crypto.

That created real limitations for us.

We could not properly promote it, scale campaigns, test audiences, optimize lead costs, or reach users in the way a normal product should be able to.

What we have built and are launching tomorrow is different.

From the beginning, this product has been designed with advertising compliance in mind, so we can finally run proper campaigns through platforms like Meta, Google, search, social, and other business acquisition channels.

The goal is very clear:

Bring in real users.
Generate real revenue.
Create real utility for the $ION ecosystem.

My focus right now is simple: I want the company to generate revenue without needing to sell a single token anymore.

Once we reach profitability, we can move with more strength into the next phase: token appreciation, buybacks, burns, deeper utility, and long-term ecosystem growth.

I want this project to succeed more than anyone.

I want you all to know that I am doing my best, every single day, to beat what sometimes feels impossible.

What I can promise is transparency.

Positive or negative, I will keep sharing the progress, the data, the feedback, the next steps, and what we are learning along the way.

These next two weeks will show us a lot:

Whether the product is strong.
Whether acquisition costs make sense.
How real customers react.
What feedback we receive.
What needs to be improved.
And how fast we can turn this into a profitable growth engine.

What I can say already is that we are pioneers again.

This is something new, something nobody else is doing in the way we are preparing to do it, and that is one of the reasons we are keeping the product name private for now.

Not because there is anything to hide.

But because we want to protect the launch, protect the team’s work, and avoid unnecessary FUD around a product that deserves a clean start.

New product.
New brand.
Same company.

Just like Online+ has its own name, brand, and domain, this new product also has its own brand and domain.

That does not mean it is separated from Ice Labs.
That does not mean anything strange is happening.
It simply means we are launching it properly for the market it is built for.

Tomorrow is the beginning.

Now we execute, measure, improve, and prove.

[Zeus @ice_z3us]

☄️ We said two weeks. We were wrong. It launches Monday

[Ice Open Network @ice_blockchain]

💫 We owe you an apology.

One week ago, we said Phase One of the new ION direction was expected to launch within two weeks.

We were wrong.

Phase One is already finished — and the controlled launch is scheduled to begin first thing Monday.

That means we are moving one week earlier than expected.

Over the past week, our small team pushed harder than ever. We have integrated AI deeply into our development, QA, testing, iteration, documentation, and automation workflows.

In total, last week, we processed more than 17 billion AI tokens across agentic development pipelines, automated QA loops, regression testing, edge-case simulations, code reviews, optimization tasks, technical documentation, campaign preparation, and product validation work.

While we were sleeping, our agents were still working.

Testing.
Breaking things.
Finding issues.
Re-running flows.
Improving outputs.
Validating user journeys.
Preparing the product for real clients.

This is exactly the speed we were missing in the past.

We had strong ideas before, but we often lacked the execution velocity needed to bring them to market fast enough. This time, things are different.

Phase One is not a hype launch.

It is a controlled launch with a small initial client base, where we will calibrate campaigns, optimize acquisition costs, collect real feedback, improve conversion flows, and validate demand with actual users.

The goal is simple:

Build a product that brings real utility, real monthly revenue, and real value back into the ION ecosystem.

This new direction is connected to the AI industry, but it is not dependent on crypto hype, KOLs, market noise, or empty speculation. It can be marketed through real business channels, including search, social, and direct acquisition campaigns.

We have already prepared multiple campaign angles. Once we begin collecting data, I will share updates as transparently as possible: what works, what does not, what we are improving, and how the product is performing.

Some people will say this is just marketing.

That is fine.

If it is only marketing, it will not survive contact with real clients, real campaigns, real feedback, and real numbers.

The project is 100% open-source under the MIT license and will be shared publicly at the right moment.

For now, we launch, measure, learn, improve, and grow.

This is the rebuild.

This is the speed we needed.

And this is how we make ION stronger, sharper, and useful again.

Zeus

[Ice Open Network @ice_blockchain]

💫 Over the past month, we have been working on a new direction for ION — one that I personally believe can define the future of this project.

This time, we are doing things differently.
In the past, we shared too much too early: teasers, plans, timelines, and details before products were fully ready. We learned from that. This time, we build first, launch first, prove first, and only then reveal everything.

Phase One of this new product is almost ready and is expected to launch within the next two weeks.

The product is connected to the AI industry, designed to generate revenue from day one, and built to bring real utility and long-term value back into the ION ecosystem.

Unlike previous initiatives, this does not depend on crypto KOLs, hype cycles, or market noise. It can be marketed directly through proper business channels, including social and search campaigns. This was something we could not realistically do with Online+ due to the nature of the product and the restrictions we faced with major advertising platforms.

Once the campaigns begin, we believe it should take around four weeks to validate the product, the demand, and the market response.

For now, because of the aggressive FUD and unnecessary attacks around ION, we will not disclose the product name publicly until the right moment. The product is being launched by Ice Labs under a separate brand, as it is focused on AI and not directly branded as the ION Chain.

This approach protects the launch, protects the team’s work, and gives the product the clean start it deserves.

I will keep the community updated step by step as we move forward. Once we prove traction and growth, we will reveal more and bring the community fully into what we are building.

In around six weeks, we will have a much clearer answer on where ION stands and what this new direction can become.
I am more confident than ever that ION can come back stronger, sharper, and more focused than before.

Now it is up to the community to decide: believe in the rebuild, or watch it happen from the sidelines.

Zeus

[Zeus @ice_z3us]

Builders check 👇

How many of you are developers or have experience building front-end, back-end, or full-stack products?

[FaMoEverything @famo_everything]

And here it is 👌

Open source token minter on ION chain, built and provided by an initiative community member @Prof__block and finally dispersing the rumors that no token can be made on ION chain ✨

Yes the liquidity is zero bcz dex on ION is needed yet.

I tested it myself 👇

[Professor Block @Prof__block]

I built this because everyone for a considerable amount of time was saying that you cannot build or do certain things on the chain, including being able to launch/mint a token on it.

This is a showcase of that. More things will follow over time, and my last wish is to make it to DEX one day, if project remains.

[Professor Block @Prof__block]

Spent the last few days building this on my own dime and time, for the ION community.
ION Hub — a free, open-source community platform for Ice Open Network.

Live now: https://t.co/NVWnb3eEe8

ION Hub — Token Launchpad: Launch tokens on Ice Open Network in one click.
No code. No friction, Near-zero gas.

Go mint something cool. Go deploy something.
$ICE $ION @ice_blockchain

[Professor Block @Prof__block]

Hi everyone,

I haven’t been posting for a while because I have been busy with something for weeks lately, and also because I had nothing to say too due to recent events.

I haven’t been able to form a solid opinion either. So, neither have anything to contribute to fuds, nor the supporters at the moment.

However, I saw a repository created and made public just a while ago, and I wanted to brief it as always for information.

Supabase is an open-source platform where you get access to backend tools, database etc. with ease, and for fast and scalable building. It is one of the most popular platforms used worldwide. And nearly everyone building with AI like Claude Code etc. these days are using this platform.

I haven’t been speaking for the token prices for months now, and I won’t say anything even right now. I have no idea about that. But on tech side, this is aligning with the AI-first migration.

$ICE $ION @ice_blockchain

[Zeus @ice_z3us]

👉 A personal note on the noise, the lies, and why I’m still building

Lately, I’ve received a lot of hate, FUD, and even death threats from certain people in the community. Some of those threats have already been reported to the authorities.

Despite all of that, I’m still here. I’m still building. And I’m still ignoring the noise.

What I’m seeing lately is not criticism grounded in facts. It’s conspiracy theories, hallucinations, and people repeating accusations they never took the time to verify for themselves.

So let’s address a few of them directly.

1) “You rugged the community”

This claim falls apart the moment anyone looks at the public history of our work.

We started building this project at the beginning of January 2022. We made the code public in March 2023. That is easily verifiable on GitHub across all repositories related to Phase One.

For example, when we made the mobile app repository public, it already contained 229,000 lines of code written by our team during that period:
https://t.co/owyHa16Fyy
Since then, our team has written millions of lines of code across the broader codebase over the past four years.

So let me ask a simple question: does it make any sense that a team would invest years of work, millions in cost, build publicly, show its faces, attend conferences, go live on streams, and continue shipping for years — only to “rug” at the lowest point?

If the goal had ever been to scam people, there were far easier moments to disappear. We did not disappear. We kept building.

That matters.

The work was real. The cost was real. The commitment was real. And it has all been visible for anyone willing to look.

What is not serious is hiding behind anonymous accounts, refusing to verify public information, and then throwing around the word “scam” as if that replaces evidence.

2) “You changed from ICE to ION so you could mint tokens and dump on the community”

This is another false narrative pushed by people who either do not understand how bridge contracts work, or do not care to understand.

We did not migrate from ICE to ION because of some secret plan to mint coins and scam users. We were sued by Intercontinental Exchange over trademark infringement related to ICE. That legal battle went on for years. We won in the US, and then the fight continued in the EU. Based on legal advice, we changed the ticker from ICE to ION. That is why the migration happened.

Reference:
https://t.co/E8JT6llSxv

Now let’s address the bridge contract allegation clearly.
The fact that the ION BSC bridge contract contains mint functionality does not mean we can mint unlimited tokens whenever we want.

That is how bridged assets work.

The ION bridge between Ice Open Network and BSC follows a lock-and-mint / burn-and-unlock model:

When a user bridges ION from Ice Open Network to BSC, the original ION is locked on the Ice Open Network side.

Then the corresponding bridged amount is minted on BSC.

When a user bridges back from BSC to Ice Open Network, the bridged ION on BSC is burned.
The original ION is then unlocked on Ice Open Network.
So yes, the BSC contract has mint functionality. It has to. That is part of bridge logic. It does not mean the team can arbitrarily create supply out of thin air.
This is visible in the verified contract code on BscScan, where minting is part of the bridge mechanism involving validation logic and functions such as voteForMinting, not a simple “owner prints tokens” button:
https://t.co/HCg4pdmAx6

The total supply remains 21B ION. Bridging does not create extra supply. It mirrors already locked tokens across chains.

And if anyone wants to verify major allocations and wallets independently, they can do that on our official whales page:
https://t.co/PHDchnhF27
You can clearly see the main pools there, including:

Elector — staked coins from community users

Rewards — community rewards pool, vested and locked
BSC Bridge — coins allocated to bridge activity to BSC

Team — team allocation, locked and vested

Ecosystem Growth and Innovation — locked and vested
Treasury — treasury allocation, also locked with vesting
These addresses can also be cross-checked against our Coin Economics page:
https://t.co/ODJAmLOZS7
Everything is public.
The contract is public.
The distribution is public.
The allocation model is public.
So before repeating the claim that “the team can mint unlimited ION on BSC,” verify the data first.

3) “You stole $50M from investors in your previous project”
This is another lie that keeps getting repeated by people who read one headline and then build a fantasy around it.

I have never hidden the fact that I worked on another blockchain project before this one, and I have spoken openly about using the lessons from that experience to build ION better.

The false “$50M stolen” narrative comes from a PR article that said we had raised approximately $50M. The reality is much simpler: at the time, we were in discussions with potential VCs who had shown interest. The money was never actually raised.
That headline created a completely false impression, and now years later some people are using it as if it were proof of a crime.
Use common sense for a second.

If someone had really stolen $50M from investors while being publicly known, publicly visible, operating openly, and continuing to appear in public, do you seriously think that person would just be freely walking around with no consequences?

The answer is obvious.

No money was stolen. No $50M raise was completed. That narrative is fiction built on a misleading PR statement and amplified by people who want drama more than truth.

4) “You’re a hacker, ran a botnet, and all the rest of the nonsense”

This is another story that has been twisted far beyond reality.

Years ago, there was an article about a business I was involved in within the IP industry, and ever since then some people have used that to paint me as some kind of criminal mastermind. It is nonsense.

What I can say is that in competitive internet industries, smear campaigns are real, trust attacks are real, and dirty tactics are common. I’ve seen that firsthand. A lot of people online read one article, make zero effort to understand the context, and then confidently spread the worst possible interpretation as if it were fact.

Again, use logic.

If I were what some of these anonymous accounts claim I am, do you think I would be operating publicly, showing my face, speaking live, attending events, and continuing to build in full view?

People are free to question me. They are not free to replace evidence with fantasy.

Where we are now

As we announced a few days ago, we are not going anywhere.

We are still building.

Yes, for the time being we have chosen to develop closed-source, and we will make things public when we are ready. This time we are taking a different approach: building products that bring revenue and utility from day one, with a strong focus on users outside of crypto so adoption can be much broader and much faster.

My history has taught me something very clearly: the bigger the project, the more noise comes with it.

More lies.
More hate.
More people projecting their own frustration onto the team that kept working while they were busy posting theories.

That changes nothing for me.

We will keep building.
We will keep shipping.
We will keep fighting when necessary.
And we will not stop because anonymous people on the internet decided to confuse fiction with facts.

If you want to criticize, do it with evidence.
If you want to verify, the data is public.
If you want to spread lies, at least understand that I’m not going to bend to them.

I’m still here.
Still building.
Still moving forward.

That’s all that matters.

[Ice Open Network @ice_blockchain]

🧑‍💻 An Update from the CEO

Over the last two days, we made the decision to continue — and more importantly, we acted on it.

We have already restructured the company and reduced operating costs from roughly $400,000 per month to around $45,000 per month. This was not easy, but it was necessary. We moved fast, cut deep, and focused only on what is essential.

The last four years taught us many lessons, but one stands above all:

A good idea means nothing if execution is too slow.

That is the lesson we are taking forward into this next chapter.

Our priority now is simple: focus on a fresh direction that can rebuild trust in the community while also generating real revenue for the company. We are no longer interested in wasting time, energy, or capital on anything that does not directly move us closer to product-market fit and sustainable growth.

I will personally be joining the development effort to help bring this next product to market as fast as possible and to work directly with the team on execution. We are not going to repeat the mistake of overpromising before delivery. We will not reveal what we are building until it is ready. For those who still believe in us, stay with us a little longer — and when the time comes, we will show you.

To move faster, we will be building this product in a closed-source environment during development. That decision is purely about speed and execution. Right now, shipping matters more than optics. Once we are live, we can focus on opening things up properly.

We are now a smaller team, made up primarily of developers, and our time will be spent exactly where it should be spent: building. No distractions. No wasted effort. No unnecessary overhead. Just execution.

Whether people choose to stand with us or not, we are moving forward with this plan. We are going to take this shot and see it through. Once the product is live, it will be something that can be marketed far beyond the crypto industry, which gives us a much stronger path toward real adoption and sustainable company revenue.

At this moment, the company still holds a little over 1 billion $ION. These tokens will be used only to cover essential development and infrastructure costs. Because the previous service agreement has ended and that external funding is no longer available, we will be activating an automatic daily sale of $1,500 worth of tokens to help fund operations at the current market price. This is not a choice we make lightly, but it is the practical path that allows us to keep building over the coming months.

Over the next 4 to 8 weeks, you should expect to see major changes across the website, the whitepaper, and most importantly, the launch of the first version of the new product.

Our goal is clear: go live fast, get real feedback fast, and scale 10x faster than we did in the past.

What we are building is a real utility product with real-world use, something unique within crypto and something we believe the market genuinely needs.

Once it goes live, we believe adoption can accelerate faster than anything we have done before — because for the first time, our growth will be driven by real utility and real demand, not just belief alone.

To everyone who has stood by us for the past four years: thank you.

Give us 4 to 8 more weeks.

That is all we ask.

Stay with us, watch what we build, and witness how we turn the hardest moment in this project’s history into the foundation of its strongest chapter.

We are still here.
We are still building.
And we are not done yet.

Thank you for the support.

[Ice Open Network @ice_blockchain]

✨ After listening to the community, we’ve made our decision:

We stay. We build. We win.

We’re restructuring the company from the ground up.
Cutting waste.
Dropping distractions.
Doubling down on what actually matters.

No more dead weight.
No more inefficient spending.
No more side paths.

Just a leaner team, better execution, and total focus on scaling.

This is not the end of anything.
It’s the beginning of a stronger chapter.

$ION is here to stay.
The road to $1B market cap begins now.

[Ice Open Network @ice_blockchain]

🚨 An Update from the CEO

I want to speak openly about the situation we are facing.

For more than four years, our company has operated out of the BVI without a traditional bank account. Throughout that time, the business was funded primarily through token-based agreements. That meant development, infrastructure, marketing, legal, and many other operational costs were covered through tokens rather than fiat. This was possible because we worked with a service provider who believed deeply in our vision and agreed to support the project in exchange for tokens.

For over four years, that provider stood by us and helped us build. However, due to recent market conditions, he lost confidence in the project and decided to claim tokens that were scheduled to unlock after two years, on 7 April. That event triggered the crash you have seen and brought our collaboration with him to an end. It has also placed the company in a very difficult position.

Over the past four years, the total cost of building this project has exceeded $18,000,000 USD. We have invoices, records, and audit trails for every expense. During this entire period, @ice_z3us, @robertpreoteasa, and @ice_apoll0 did not take salaries, because we believed in the long-term vision and chose to keep building.

As many of you know, under our tokenomics, the team managed approximately 4.2 billion tokens across the team, treasury, and ecosystem allocations. Because the monthly operating costs of the project were so high, we entered into a long-term agreement with the service provider under which he would receive a larger amount of tokens after two years in return for supporting the business and helping us scale. That structure was meant to buy us time to build properly and reach a stronger position.

The reality is that the cost of operating the project became far greater than what could reasonably be recovered. The provider ultimately lost money on the arrangement, and after investing around $18,000,000, he chose to exit and sell the tokens he was entitled to. That is what brought us to where we are today.

At this moment, the company still holds a little over 1 billion tokens. As the attached data shows, and based on the average prices at which the provider sold in recent days, it is clear that the company has been operating at a loss from the very beginning. Even so, we kept going because we truly believed in the project.

We have seen many accusations claiming that we, as a team, dumped tokens on the community. That is simply not true. What happened was the termination of an agreement with a long-term service provider, and that outcome has now been reflected in the market.

The project's current operating cost is around $400,000 per month. Many people do not realize how expensive it is to keep a project like this alive at scale. Even if every token we had received had been sold, it still would not have fully covered the total costs and obligations of the business.

We never lied when we said we believed in this project. In fact, we are the ones who have been hurt the most by this situation.

Because I want to remain fully transparent, I have to say this clearly: we are now reviewing whether it is possible to reduce costs significantly over the coming weeks, potentially by half. If we continue operating, it may require us to sell part of the remaining treasury tokens to cover essential expenses. We are no longer in a position where we can keep absorbing losses indefinitely, especially after already carrying losses of roughly $8 million.

What happens next depends on whether the project still has real support from the market and the community. We will watch the coming days carefully and assess whether there is enough confidence and momentum for us to continue building. If there is, we will keep going. If there is not, we will be forced to consider shutting the project down. And if that happens, I want to be clear: we will burn our remaining tokens, not sell them.

It is also important for the community to understand how much of the unlocked token supply was used to support the ecosystem. Out of the 4.2 billion tokens managed across these years, more than 900 million tokens were used for exchange campaigns, KOLs, and liquidity. Many people ask for listings, but few understand what listings actually require: exchange liquidity, market making, campaigns, promotions, and other associated costs. These are real costs, and they are substantial.

There is another truth I have avoided discussing publicly until now, but I believe it is important to say it. Exchanges do not value all user bases equally. Large user numbers from Tier 3 countries did not help with listings in the way many people assumed. In many cases, exchanges specifically asked us for performance and user metrics excluding those regions. This is an uncomfortable reality of the industry, but it is a reality nonetheless.

In the images attached, I have also shared detailed costs, including what different exchanges charged us and how many tokens were required for marketing and listing-related activity. I want people to better understand how this industry really works. We have nothing to hide, and the exchanges involved can confirm the commercial structures.

I am deeply saddened that we are in this position, but I owe you the truth. The documentation is there. The records are there. The transaction history is there.

If anything, we are the ones who lost the most trying to make this vision real.

[Rizo @RizoWeb3]

Good News 🚀
BitcoinHabebe is working with @ice_z3us to find a solution for $ION holders.

Hopefully, the community will benefit from this effort 🤝

[Mr Snow☃️ @Mr_Snow30]

Seeing the current dump on #ION… yeah, it’s not funny... Quite sad 💔

A big chunk of $ION got bridged from ION Chain to BSC and sold, that part is obvious.

The pattern looks like multiple wallets receiving similar amounts from a system source, then dumping.

Could be VALIDATORS. And honestly, that wouldn’t be shocking.
These guys Staked their funds in ION and run nodes, earn rewards, and at the end of the day, some are just here for profit.
After this long, some of them will take exits... Maybe frustration? strategy? Or a coordinated dump after some internal demands not agreed on? whatever it is.

The idea that the team is minting to dump doesn’t really make sense. It’s just the easiest thing to say when price drops and anger sets in.

Truth is, we don’t fully know what’s going on yet. Some of us are only exploring the logical reasons behind it.

I’ve seen people asking the team to step in and push the price up, yeah that is out of concern and love for the project... but that can backfire ❌.
If sellers aren’t done, they’ll just dump into that liquidity.
More like giving them better price to dump on 😀...

Sometimes it’s better to let it play out for a while, take action a bit later...
For now let the normal buyback from @baomarkets and burning from @bao_rush continue, while community members that can stake their heart in can buy more if they can, at a cheaper rate...

If anything, I’d rather this kind of shakeout happens now than later.

Team is still building, network is still running. That hasn’t changed.

@ice_blockchain is very much alive and building!
I personally have an Ai Powered platform built On-Chain, massive and fully functional that I am yet to disclose to anyone... So products are coming on #ION 🚀

If you’ve been in crypto long enough, you’ve seen this before. It’s not new, just uncomfortable.

[Isabella @ibby_ion]

This year is for $ION

Mark my words, time will prove me right

I’m waiting………

[Ice Open Network @ice_blockchain]

🔥 As mentioned, we’re actively working on it.

Real usage, weekly buybacks, and growing impact across the ecosystem.

This is how we build through market conditions.

[Bao Trader @baomarkets]

WEEK 3 — $ION BUYBACK COMPLETE

Three weeks. Three buybacks. Zero excuses.

Week 1: $21,601 ✅
Week 2: $32,117 ✅
Week 3: $27,315 ✅

Total bought back: $81,033

We crossed $80K in just 3 weeks.

📅 Every single week, like clockwork
📈 On track for $100K+/month
🔥 $100K total buyback incoming next week

Actions speak louder than promises.

Bao, Trade Crypto like a Whale 🐋

https://t.co/uQJSQQdWqg

[Ice Open Network @ice_blockchain]

📉 We see the price action. We’re not ignoring it.

There are whales moving, liquidity shifting, and it looks like coordinated activity in the market. This is outside our direct control, but how we respond is not.

There are ~11B $ION in circulation, with more than half already on the ION chain. No new coins are being minted. What we’re seeing is movement through bridging, not dilution.

On our side, we are taking action today. We’re working closely with @baomarkets and @bao_rush to drive buybacks, burns, and real usage across the ecosystem.

We’ll keep building, integrating, and pushing forward.