One of the main perks of being an IP lawyer is that your clients usually do some pretty cool and smart things. Our firm Inteo is 5 years old, and I could not be more grateful.
@Bert_VdA@RuttenGwendolyn@BartSomers Ik dacht dat @BartSomers pas maandag aan het werk ging :) - Alle gekheid/stokjes: ik ben Mechelaar, en blij dat Somers terug burgemeester wordt. Maar ik was bij de vorige verkiezingen (misschien naief) teleurgesteld dat hij kort na de verkiezingen opstapte om minister te worden.
Killing the bird is one of the most "look at me, I am rich and I can do anything" moves I have ever seen. The service has been poor since the sale. I am not a fan of Meta, but once Threads is available in the EU, I'll be tweeting elsewhere.
Mag ik het belachelijk vinden dat het belang van een arrest wordt bepaald door het aantal rechters in de zetel? Gelukkig moet ik in mijn praktijk dat media-spelletje niet spelen.
@DavidWoycechow2 @Rachael_IP They do. But tone matters, a lot. I spend a lot of time removing stuff from 1st drafts that are arrogant and unnecessary for the purpose of the brief. It itches, when opposing counsel raises outrageous arguments. But judges are not dumb. So I keep my snarkiness for the 1st draft.
"A profound new way to be together" is the tagline at the end, and yet everyone in the Apple Vision Pro launch video is sitting on their couch alone. https://t.co/MyJaV7vICq
@Bert_VdA It seems like he was dropped at the last minute, going by the announcement domain name. Would have been fun if they had decided to drop Overy instead :D https://t.co/Yeul7Tj6GI
I know nothing about the stock market, very little about economics, and a bit about brand value, but I am completely flabbergasted that Hermès is worth more as a company than Novartis. https://t.co/VhI8udR3I6
@LVTornh Ik kan (en wil) niet beoordelen wie er "geschikt" is, maar: Saverys, De Nul, De Clerck...? Ook bij mij trouwens geen 'klik' na de eerste afleveringen van Succession. Het lijkt me wat het Dallas van deze generatie.
@CecereCarl Also (very) enjoyable: telling a client his suggestion X is not relevant to the case, losing the case for an entirely unrelated reason, and having the client say "See, we should have said X".
I am an EU-based lawyer, but I disagree. The only reason to withdraw the opposition is PR. Even from a layman perspective: are you suggesting no part of the public would associate that BLM-sign with adidas?
Adidas has been very aggressive in policing its stripes.
But when you look at the difference in color and shape of the stripes, I think that Adidas is unlikely to win this case if it goes to trial.
[7/8]