@SteiganN Hvis NATO nå går til krig mot Russland, hvor er de 500.000 sykesengene (og personell) som trengs etter at Norge har blitt bombandert med 5-6 hydrogenbomber på 300kt ? Byer og militære installasjoner (Vardø osv.) blir utslettet, enorme områder brenner opp.
https://t.co/Jtmw2RleCK
@HeleneTveit1 Fullstendig galskap. En krig mellom Russland og NATO vil raskt gå over i en atomkrig, med fullstendig ødeleggelse av Europa som følge☢️Dessuten vet vi ikke hva de har i verdensrommet, som kan slippes ned rett i hue på oss. Russerne har skutt opp mange militære satelitter i 2026:
Ursula von der Leyen announced this week that everyone in the EU must use the official EU age verification app to verify their age before they can log into or post on social media and other digital services.
As an expert in online child safety, I'm here to expose the disinformation in each von der Leyen's statements. See below.
🇪🇺 The EU Kids Act is a pretext designed to enforce mandatory digital identity verification on everyone in Europe. The proposed legislation applies to any digital service featuring feeds, user generated content, or messaging:
Social media networks, video platforms, online gaming services, AI tools, and media streaming apps like Spotify. (@TimSweeneyEpic)
Under the proposal, digital services must enforce age restrictions across strict tiers. Tech companies must mandate age verification across all accounts to enforce these tiers legally.
When Australia introduced its social media ban, the government conceded it failed because platform level age checks weren’t reliable. They now reject age estimation as inadequate and shifted to demanding "robust" age checking.
💡 If you eliminate every unproven estimation method, you’re left with exactly 1 functional mechanism: identity verification. There's not other way to ensure age checking is "robust".
No government wants to admit citizens must prove their real identity just to access apps and basic streaming services like Spotify, so they hide behind the ambiguous phrase "robust age checking". This language is now used across Australia, the US, and Ireland to mandate identity checks while avoiding the public backlash of calling it what it is. I will research to see where else it’s being used.
Below is what Ursula von der Leyen told the European Parliament in Strasbourg along with my analsyis:
🇪🇺 "Today, much of this power has been taken out of the hands of parents... What our children need is time... But when a child has a smartphone, all of this is taken away."
💡 This framing falsely presents smartphones as uncontrollable. Apple and Google built free OS controls into iOS and Android settings, covering virtually every smartphone on the market.
These controls achieve every legitimate safety objective without collecting personal data or processing state credentials.
💡 Millions of parents use these parental controls to enforce screen time curfews, block app installations, and restrict communication.
💡 These settings operate at the device level. Teens can't bypass them when protected with a passcode.
To bypass this technical reality, the European Commission uses public grief to shut down logical analysis:
🇪🇺 "Day and night, parents see the costs, loss of sleep, anxiety, even self-harm, and in a growing number of cases, even fatal tragedies… a 14-year-old girl living in Belgium who took her life exactly one month ago, victim of bullying online... Honourable members, enough is enough."
💡 Citing personal tragedies replaces software engineering facts with emotional rhetoric. State laws and age gates don’t alter human behaviour or prevent online harassment. Regulators exploit grief to pass surveillance legislation without explaining how the underlying software mechanisms operate.
The Commission outlines specific age tiers to restrict access:
🇪🇺 "In sum, no social media under the age of 13. No personal account under the age of 15. That means from 13 to under 15, only mini accounts set up and supervised by parents or guardians with limited features and time restriction to one hour a day. And between 15 and 18, safe design will be an obligation for the platforms."
💡 Enforcing age tiers forces tech companies and service providers to rebuild their architecture around total access control. The must disable self-service account creation, purge unverified accounts, build supervised parental workflows, strip algorithmic feeds, and enforce strict session cutoffs.
💡 Social networks operate on open interaction algorithms that inherently expose people to unvetted content. Because software can’t dynamically filter these risks for minors, tech companies must block access for everyone until a person proves their real identity.
💡 It’s not just about social networks. They want the same bans for almost everything, including games and stream services. Even Spotify because it’s possible for customers to message people.
The Commission claims its proposed zero knowledge proof app protects personal privacy:
🇪🇺 "Age will be verified using EU certified tools like our age verification app. This app is built on zero knowledge proof. That means that the platform only learns one single thing, and that's whether you're old enough to allow access or not."
💡 This framing describes what an app or service receives while hiding what everyone must give up. A zero knowledge proof provides a mathematical confirmation, but that confirmation requires an authoritative issuer. Before the app generates a proof, a state approved entity must verify the person's real identity.
The Commission frames this shift as a victory against tech corporations:
🇪🇺 "I am aware that many perceive the power of Big Tech as overwhelming and impossible to roll back. I disagree... So we do not accept this. We are reversing the burden of proof. Now platforms will have to prove to us that they are safe. Because this is not about our minors accessing social media. It is about when and how we allow social media to access our minors."
💡 Social networks don’t access children; parents hand smartphones to children. Reversing the burden of proof forces everyone to verify their identity.
The European Commission confirmed the broader scope of this mandate:
🇪🇺 "We also know that not only minors are at risk. Addictive design, for example, are harming everyone. This is why we need a wider framework too, the Digital Fairness Act that we will propose in autumn."
🚨 Child safety is merely the initial wedge. The Digital Fairness Act expands state mandated identity verification to adults across all online services. Binding real identities to online activity permanently eliminates pseudonymous access, private communication, and democratic accountability.
🚨 Senior state officials and regulators know their demands have nothing to do with child safety. They work closely with tech companies and understand that iOS and Android already provide complete authority to restrict devices locally without collecting personal data. State officials deliberately ignore well established parental controls because they keep internet access under family control. Child safety is a public pretext.
🚨 Governments and regulators use child safety to establish mandatory identity verification across every app and digital service, eliminating online anonymity. When tech companies and state agencies link every social media post, private message, search term, geographic location, and financial transaction to a verified identity, they create a permanent digital dossier on every citizen with a global social graph that makes Cambridge Analytica look like a 2nd grade school science project.
💡 Binding people’s identity to daily activity enables predictive behavioural modelling too. By feeding identity data into automated predictive AI, governments, intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and tech companies move beyond surveillance past behaviour. They can map political affiliations, predict individual actions, flag dissent before it occurs, and control public opinion at scale. Eliminating online anonymity ends free speech, private communication, and democratic accountability.
As Larry Ellison stated at Oracle’s Financial Analyst Meeting in 2024:
"Citizens will be on their best behaviour, because we’re constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on".
🙏🏻 Share this to expose how governments use child safety as a false pretext to force mandatory digital identity verification on everyone.
https://t.co/euLnd0qfhK
These results demonstrate that 5methylC bases are not functionally inert!
Recall all those fact checkers and FDA regulators claiming this residual DNA is NOT functional... Not according the Plasmid MFG literature.
@RobertFicoSVK The most alarming thing is that any direct military confrontation between Russia and NATO will quickly become a nuclear war, with absolute fatal consequences for us all. Do not forget that new and terrible biologic warfare agents will also likely be used. Not many will survive.
Tomorrow I will be speaking at the ICIM (International College of Integrative Medicine) conference in Dearborn, MI - along with AAron Siri, Jefferey Jaxen, Del Bigtree, and many others on Vaccines & Immunology. People who are really in the fight to bring truth to power. It is going to be one heck of an event.
DETTE SKAL STANSES EN GANG FOR ALLE- NÅ!
Høyre og Ap har samme kultur: makten er et karrierestige, ikke et verv.
En utenriksminister fra Høyre bevilger bistand til WEF, går rett over i topplederjobben og håver inn millionlønn. Ap-folk i det samme internasjonale kretsløpet middag med Epstein, tar imot fordeler og kaller det «diplomati» til dokumentene kommer. Pengene er dine. Jobbene er deres.
Sånn ser rotten kultur ut: – Revolving door mellom UD, bistand og Genève – Bistandskroner til en rikmannsklubb mens vanlige folk mister kjøpekraft – Forklaringer som endrer seg når fakta kommer på bordet – Null avstand mellom den som bevilger og den som mottar
Dette er ikke høyre mot venstre. Dette er de samme familiene, de samme middagsbordene og de samme internasjonale vervene. Partifargen byttes. Nettverket består.
Et seriøst land slutter å late som dette er «kompetanse». Det er maktmisbruk.
Det begynner å bli litt mange som har skjønt dette her nå, så det blir etter hvert vanskelig for regjeringen å surre mer med det.
Strømprisene er for høye. Det skyldes energipolitikken.
https://t.co/iE0heFVjng
@Rakkis1974 Tragisk, de kaster bort skattebetalernes penger på alt mulig utenlands, mens sykehus, gamlehjem og infrastruktur her hjemme forfaller og råtner bort.
@BowesChay What the WEF EU-elite club and other globalist leaders are insanely focused on is to have a whole-of-Europe-government, with puppet politicians in each country. They have largely succeeded. Now they try to drag Canada into it as well. EU should be shut down, it is bad for Europe.
Lundteigen: – EØS-avtalen ødelegger den norske modellen – Stortinget kan ikke lenger korrigere markedet så omfattende som folk flest ber om. For det strider mot prinsippene i EØS-avtalen. Det sa Per Olaf Lundteigen (Sp) i 2018. Lundteigen kommer på Mot … https://t.co/7Y5GzEqeUP
@MelGibsonxvyv YES ! EU is bad for Europe, we don't need an arrogant and selfish WEF elite-club who has one goal only, to make themself wealthy and have a lot of power in all of Europe. They make new directives and laws that harm sovereign states, the EU must be abandon and closed down forever!
Ursula von der Leyen wants Canada to become the EU’s first “associate member.”
Perfect.
Because apparently Canada wasn’t quite globalist enough already.
Why stop at trade? Let Brussels help with the regulations, climate mandates, digital rules, migration policy and the ever-expanding Nanny State.
National sovereignty is so 20th century.
The 21st-century model is much more efficient: import the people, regulate the citizens, centralize the power, censor the internet, decide what is allowed to be voted on, and call it “democracy.”
@tveitmiljo Triste saker, Norge ødelegges. Madshus-styret foreslår å legge ned skifabrikken på Biri, verdens eldste skifabrikk, etter 120 år med produksjon i Norge. Styret ønsker at skiproduksjonen skal flyttes til Novo Mesto i Tsjekkia, hjemlandet til Madshus sine nye eiere. NRK :