The court’s efforts to emphasize the “solemnity” of the courtroom (which I agree with) were entirely undercut by injecting into that solemnity an unidentified tweet of ambiguous origin without disclosing the underlying facts or investigation.
Today Judge Mark Gildea threatened to find Karen Read in default, and therefore liable for the death of Officer John O'Keefe, without a trial. He did so without a hearing or even allowing her attorneys to speak.
What's more, he instructed her attorneys to go back to their respective offices and prepare a document that would enable the Judge to enter that default through violation of a consent order, thus eliminating any possibility of an appeal or other recourse.
In effect, he directed Karen Read's attorneys to tie the noose by which the Court would hang her.
This is an absolute outrage. Not only shouldn't Ms. Read and her attorneys stand for it, her adversaries shouldn't stand for it either.
Judge Kim Jong Gildea’s Plymouth Superior Kangaroo Communist Court wishes that it be known he doesn’t want his court cases to be a social media SPECTACLE by threatening to permanently order that racist mysoginist lying Fired Former Trooper Michael Proctor can skip his deposition🤬
He wants everyone to know he has “broad discretion” to do whatEVER he wants. Attorneys not responsible for whatever social media post he’s mad about can be held in contempt and sanctioned if he feels like it. He doesn’t care if the leak wasn’t from the attorneys and doesn’t care to hear what they have to say.
How about you familiarize YOURSELF with the rules of professional conduct and treat the attorneys with basic respect? Today’s SPECTACLE was the exact opposite of anyone’s right to a fair trial, Sir.
YOU are the one “Churning the waters” to generate social media coverage. The world is watching, whether you like it or not and we have GRAVE CONCERNS about the judicial proceedings in your state where an innocent woman who was twice prosecuted and EXONERATED is still fighting for her life as the courts continue to protect Fired Former Trooper Michael Proctor (who, ironically publicly disclosed Karen Read’s private medical information - among other EGREGIOUS acts in his role as “investigator”.)
Social Media is watching ANOTHER judge, not interested in Truth, but only dead set on hamstringing Karen Read’s attorneys and draining her bank account.
OUTRAGEOUS🤬
My take- Judge Gildea is part of the "Good ol Boys" & is doing everything in his power to protect Proctor, the CW & all the corrupt players. Looks like "Uncle Bev" is gonna be an obstacle in the way of justice for JOK, KR & all of their victims.
In my opinion, Judge Gildea arrived this afternoon with a prepared decision blaming certain attorneys - and exonerating others from blame - for what he has concluded is a violation of protective orders.
The Court declined to hear from the parties at whom he appeared to be directing his considerable ire. This is a due process violation of epic proportions.
Repeating my prior observation . . . Never mind that Michael Proctor broadcast Karen Read's medical issues amongst his lecherous friends with apparent impunity. Apparently, this Court wants to make sure poor, victimized Michael Proctor doesn't have to suffer the same indignity he dished out, for the next thirty years.
If this was the plan of certain very bad actors to prevent Karen Read from proving the abject corruption of the investigation into the death of Officer John O'Keefe, it seems they managed to get away with it for now.
Fortunately, this order won't impact the federal civil right action.
That entire hearing could’ve just been done in an email. That was just a judge reminding the lawyers that he has a bigger dick than all of them. What a disgrace.
So Gildea just cost ALL THAT FUCKING MONEY to fly attys in for him to reference some vague shit, that an X account posted- NOT IMPOUNDED DOCUMENTS- but speculation & observation, so he could lecture attorneys about it? And then gets up & leaves? Is this real fucking life?
If the courts don’t want the courts to become a spectacle then they shouldn’t frame innocent people for murder and bring ridiculous indictments to trial.
I'm just getting to watch @defense_diaries live tonight breaking down what led up to tomorrow's hearing in front of Judge Gildea. Bob's rant about Proctor was 🙌🔥 Everything he said is SPOT 👏 ON 👏 Had to rewind & listen again!
Couple things about Judge Gildea's emergency order.
(1) The order addresses "parties" to the wrongful death action. Neither Michael Proctor nor Aidan Kearney are parties to that case.
(2) Any information disseminated prior to the impoundment order, but definition, isn't in violation of that order.
(3) Michael Proctor felt entitled to spread Karen Read's medical issues amongst his lecherous friends. Why are the Commonwealth courts so concerned only with Proctor's sensibilities?
@FKR102445 Colin Albert was the fucking ring bearer in her wedding. You don't put people "several degrees removed" from you in your wedding party, or have them attend it. Nor do they babysit your children. The lies they tell are so easily debunked! What a lying sack of shit.
@CatQuestionsAll@RealNurseKim THIS!!! People don't understand how quickly 1 punch can end someone's life. They didn't need 30 minutes or more, just 30 seconds for 1 person to throw a punch, JOK falls, hits his head & it's all over!
@MCCossyG@WhitKnitwhit Sarcasm & inference are not typically the strong suit of dumbasses. So, it's understandable that Nitwit here didn't catch on. Just like most ppl didn't catch on to Tim Pools "under no circumstance should you read or listen to what Aidan Kearney is saying"
@melrevision I def got the Boston version toddler. When my son was 3, we were walking & came to a crosswalk, car pulls up to the stop sign, dudes looking down at his phone. Son points & yells "LOOK AT THIS ASSHOLE, ON HIS PHONE NOT EVEN PAYING ATTENTION!" 😭😭😭
Hey @TheView, i’m challenging you to bring me onto your show.
You spit nothing but falsehoods and misinformation in this entire clip. You might be “following this case now”. I’ve been reporting and investigating this case for over a year.
FACT CHECK: A “jury of your peers” does NOT mean the jurors have to be the same race as the defendant.
You confidently claimed that because there wasn’t someone the same color as the defendant on the jury, it wasn’t a jury of his peers. That is 100% false.
A jury of your peers means a jury selected from the community and judged by fellow citizens. It does NOT mean every juror has to match the defendant’s race, gender, religion, age, or background.
If that were true, every defendant would be entitled to a jury custom-built to mirror their demographics. That’s not how the legal system works.
The Constitution requires that juries be selected from a fair cross-section of the community. It does NOT require that the final jury contain members of any particular race.
The idea that people can only fairly judge someone if they share the same skin color is not only legally wrong, it’s an incredibly racist way of viewing the justice system.
Also, Karmelo was NOT 130 lbs. But clearly you don’t get your info from anything other than racist social media influencers instead of the documented FACTS.
And the AUDACITY to say “he was the only black kid under the tent”?! A large portion of the witnesses who were UNDER THE TENT who TESTIFIED AGAINST KARMELO were BLACK!
I am FLABBERGASTED by the outright lies you just spewed!