@teefehbaby Bs she got what she deserved by constantly hitting him first. If you don’t want a man to put his hands on you don’t put yours on him. Simple. You women are delusional and children if you think you can do whatever you want with no consequences. Argue with yo mama
@lergbmediagroup@starmexxx , arrangement, editing, composition choices, or other original contributions.
You’re speaking in absolutes about law that is still actively being litigated.
@lergbmediagroup@starmexxx You just contradicted yourself.
Calling something a legal gray area and then saying “you definitely cannot copyright it” is mutually exclusive.
Gray area means unsettled — not definitive.
Also, disputed training data does not automatically erase human authorship in lyrics
@lergbmediagroup@starmexxx and adds original expression, that can create protectable authorship in those human-made elements.
“Used Suno = cannot copyright” is an oversimplification, not legal fact
@lergbmediagroup@starmexxx You keep stating unsettled AI law like it’s black-and-white when it isn’t.
Training-data disputes are one legal question.
Copyrightability of a final work containing human authorship is another.
If a human writes lyrics, directs composition, selects outputs, edits, arranges,
@lergbmediagroup@starmexxx Wrong again. Not how that works.
You’re mixing AI training lawsuits with copyright authorship standards like they’re the same thing they’re not.
Different issue, different law, different analysis.
But nice try though