Jairam Ramesh tweeted in September 2024 that the Adani Nairobi airport proposal would spark protests turning into anti-India anger because of the Prime Minister’s so-called “special friendship” with Adani.
What actually happened tells a very different and disturbing story. Adani offered nearly $2 billion to upgrade Jomo Kenyatta International Airport under a concession model. The deal was cancelled in November 2024 after a coordinated campaign of protests, negative publicity, and a social media drive led by Kenyan influencer Nelson Amenya all fuelled by US allegations that have now been closed by the Department of Justice for lack of conclusive evidence.
Even a fake press release was circulated to damage Adani during this period.
Two years later, Kenya awarded a $2.9 billion contract almost 50% higher than the original Indian offer to a Chinese state-owned company. India lost a major private investment opportunity in East Africa. China gained strategic ground while Kenyan taxpayers were forced to pay significantly more.
Jairam Ramesh and the entire Congress party didn’t just stay silent they actively amplified this controversy from India. Their political attacks helped turn a legitimate commercial proposal toxic and made it easier for China to step in after an Indian company was pushed out. Was this really just political opposition, or was there something more deliberate behind it?
Congress has a long and consistent history of aligning with China. They had signed an MoU with the Chinese Communist Party and maintained that relationship for years. Whether it is weakening India’s stand on the border, opposing Indian companies abroad, or creating obstacles for projects that can strengthen India, Congress has repeatedly shown that it has no problem working against Indian interests when China stands to benefit.
When it comes to choosing between protecting Indian interests and helping China, why does Congress always seem to choose China?
Their actions in the Kenya airport case have once again exposed whose side they are truly on.
Fear!
Actually, it is PDF or Pain, Death and Fear for the helpless animals being slaughtered and those waiting for their turn to be put to knife.
Bua, the pain you are claiming to be experiencing is nothing compared with what the voiceless feel. Your art of playing victim card by calling a belly ache (post a heavy dinner) a pain has long been exposed.
Cheers!
29,000 have died in our one house since we began in 1952. We give them a special ticket of St. Peter. It's so beautiful to see people die with so much joy. - Mother Teresa
Mother Teresa is the single-most successful emotional con-job of the 20th century. - Christopher Hitchens
In another News: NIA has informed the court that Kashmiri Porters had helped Islamic Terrorists identify Pahalgam location and Hindus during the attack...
This is the real Kashmiriyat; what u otherwise see is Business.
@ajaykraina Missionaries were brutal in Goa. If a hindu woman got widowed, the church would take away her inheritance and give her a paltry sum to survive as long as she converted. The worst of them lies in the church where people visit.
after coming to India, i envied the way how Hindu children grow up.
not only the magic of festivals with lights everywhere, but also no threating of ETERNAL hellfire...
“₹44ᴋ ғᴏʀ ᴘʀɪɴᴛᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴇғᴛ—Rᴀʟᴘʜ Lᴀᴜʀᴇɴ ᴅɪᴅɴ’ᴛ ᴊᴜsᴛ ᴄᴏᴘʏ Bᴀɴᴅʜᴀɴɪ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴏʟᴏɴɪᴀʟ-ᴡᴀsʜᴇᴅ ɪᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄʜᴀʀɢᴇᴅ ᴘʀᴇᴍɪᴜᴍ ғᴏʀ ғᴏʀɢᴇᴛᴛɪɴɢ Iɴᴅɪᴀ.”
————————————————
Ralph Lauren is facing backlash for selling a machine-printed cotton “bandhani” wrap skirt for ₹44,800 without crediting its Indian origins. Bandhani, a ancient tie-and-dye craft featured in Ajanta paintings, is painstakingly hand-knotted by generations of Indian artisans—each dot a unique act of devotion. While authentic handcrafted bandhani skirts in India cost under ₹5,000, RL’s mass-produced version steals the aesthetic, erases the cultural ancestry, and inflates the price. Critics call it modern-day East India Company exploitation: cultural appropriation without acknowledgment or fair benefit to the artisans who created it. @ravikarkara
#RalphLaurenStealsBandhani #BandhaniTheft #CulturalAppropriation #EastIndiaCompanyRedux #BoycottRalphLauren #IndianCrafts
@ajaykraina@ChatGPTJob@VishalU15
Three Pakistanis - Suleiman Shah, Abu Hamza, and Habib Tahir - carried out the Pahalgam terror attack; three Indians - Parvaiz Ahmad, Bashir Ahmad, and Mohd Yousuf - helped them.
Hatred does not only come from across the border; it comes from an ideology that transcends borders.
The Lenskart Cover-Up
A $5.6 billion company. A written policy. Two fired employees. A CEO whose story kept changing.
Lenskart — India's largest eyewear retailer, IPO-bound, valued at $5.6 billion — had a Style Guide for store staff. It surfaced on April 15.
The rules: No bindi. No tilak. No kalawa. Minimal sindoor, not on the forehead.
The hijab? Explicitly permitted. With colour instructions. And tutorial videos promised to staff.
When the document went viral, CEO Peyush Bansal called it "inaccurate." X's Community Note corrected him — the document was company-branded, dated February 2026. He then shifted: it was an "outdated training document" with an "incorrect line" that was "discovered and removed on February 17, well before this became public."
That story collapsed within 24 hours.
Akash Falake, a Lenskart store manager in Pune, had emails. He had flagged the exact same policy to Lenskart HR in writing on November 25, 2025. Senior HR was informed again on December 8. Through January and February 2026, store audits were actively cutting salaries of employees who wore bindis or tikas.
Falake escalated to the legal team. No response. On February 20, he filed a complaint on Maharashtra's government grievance portal.
The same day — he was terminated.
Then came Zeel Soghasia from Surat. Got a Lenskart job offer. Flew to Navi Mumbai for training. Day one: told to cut his shikha, remove his tilak and religious tattoos — or there would be no job.
He refused. Fired the next day.
This was April 18, 2026 — sixty days after Bansal claimed the policy had been removed.
Two employees raised this internally over five months. Both were ignored. One was fired the day he went to the government. One was fired for refusing to alter a religious symbol on his body.
The CEO's story changed three times. Each time, new evidence forced the shift.
This is how institutional discrimination works in the modern Indian workplace — not through speeches, but through audit deductions, grooming guides, and termination letters. Systems designed to be absorbed quietly.
It almost worked. Until someone leaked a PDF.
Today, India takes a defining step in its civil nuclear journey, advancing the second stage of its nuclear programme.
The indigenously designed and built Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor at Kalpakkam has attained criticality.
This advanced reactor, capable of producing more fuel than it consumes, reflects the depth of our scientific capability and the strength of our engineering enterprise. It is a decisive step towards harnessing our vast thorium reserves in the third stage of the programme.
A proud moment for India. Congratulations to our scientists and engineers.
Just see the level of toxicity in this Indian Muslim family where the wife Yasmeen Khan ran a beauty parlour where she invited Hindu girls for free beauty parlor courses. And when these girls came she used to spike their drinks. When they used to became unconscious, she used to call her husband Mohammed Sharif Khan who used to r@pe them. The wife meanwhile used to guard the reception while his husband r@ped the Hindu girls & video recorded his act to blackmail Hindu girls to have s€x with more Muslims.
When police asked the wife why she offered young Hindu girls to her husband for r@ping them, she said that they will get Jannat as she is helping r@ping kafir girls who deserved to be r@ped by Muslims. Hindus needs to be extra beware & should not allow their children's to be in contact with anyone of them. They are crooked evil people
Deepa Mehta made a film called "Fire". It was basically based on two lesbians. What were their names? Sita and Radha.
Actually, that film is based on Ismat Chugtai's story "Lihaaf". What were those characters? Rabbu and Begum Jaan. They didn't show that; instead, they made them Radha and Sita.
There was a film by Aditya Chopra, "Chak De! India". In that, they showed Kabir. To make everyone feel guilty, he was shown as a traitor just because they lost a hockey match. That is based on the real-life Hindu character Mir Ranjan Negi.
He was the one everything happened to, but to evoke guilt and aggrandize, they chose Shah Rukh Khan.
Congress did not just govern weakly. It perfected the art of distracting India from its own incompetence before 2014.
And the tweets below are not going anywhere, even if the party and it's minions try to whitewash them.
When India needed spine, Congress party offered surrender; when India needed clarity, Congress manufactured distraction.
From 26/11 to any other terrorist attacks planned and executed in India by Pakistan, the Congress formula can be summed in one line: fail on national interest, then flood the public space with noise, diversion, and non-issues so nobody focuses on the rot.
They did not just govern badly. They perfected the art of weakening India and then changing the subject.
The Congress party was and remains actively a machine for sabotaging national interest and then gaslighting the country about who was to blame.