Child of God. Husband. Father. Truth & Justice Seeker; Be the Light; Make Space for Grace. The Truth will set you Free, but First it will Make you Miserable.
On the Tinubu certificate saga, unknown to many, the Chicago State University (CSU) has already confirmed the authenticity of the 2 Tinubu CSU diplomas that have been in the public domain for a while now -they are BOTH AUTHENTIC.🧵thread🧵
@seunokin@SaharaReporters@renoomokri
@AO1379@akinoyebode Happy birthday Prof @akinoyebode. One of the joys of my life is the privilege to have been one of your students. Wishing you the best of life always, Prof.
@Dotman44580101 Exactly. That was such a weighty statement. So weighty that Atiku avoided making such a statement. It is now clear that he made that statement without any evidence to back it up. So, the only conclusion I can draw from that is that he made it in bad faith.
He said: "We won and we'll prove it in court."
Note: even the 1st runner up never said that - I listened intently to the press conference the 1st runner up had after the elections.
But what he really meant was: "Our gut feeling from our hearts of hearts is that we won, and we have faith that by some miracle when we get to court, we'll discover results that match our gut feeling."
It's now clear that he made that statement in bad faith.
Now that the SC has handed down its decision, can he please humour us and publicly release the results that show he won.
Or forever keep his peace!
He said: "We won and we'll prove it in court."
Note: even the 1st runner up never said that - I listened intently to the press conference the 1st runner up had after the elections.
But what he really meant was: "Our gut feeling from our hearts of hearts is that we won, and we have faith that by some miracle when we get to court, we'll discover results that match our gut feeling."
It's now clear that he made that statement in bad faith.
Now that the SC has handed down its decision, can he please humour us and publicly release the results that show he won.
Or forever keep his peace!
He said: "We won and we'll prove it in court."
Note: even the 1st runner up never said that - I listened intently to the press conference the 1st runner up had after the elections.
But what he really meant was: "Our gut feeling from our hearts of hearts is that we won, and we have faith that by some miracle when we get to court, we'll discover results that match our gut feeling."
It's now clear that he made that statement in bad faith.
Now that the SC has handed down its decision, can he please humour us and publicly release the results that show he won.
Or forever keep his peace!
He said: "We won and we'll prove it in court."
Note: even the 1st runner up never said that - I listened intently to the press conference the 1st runner up had after the elections.
But what he really meant was: "Our gut feeling from our hearts of hearts is that we won, and we have faith that by some miracle when we get to court, we'll discover results that match our gut feeling."
It's now clear that he made that statement in bad faith.
Now that the SC has handed down its decision, can he please humour us and publicly release the results that show he won.
Or forever keep his peace!
He said: "We won and we'll prove it in court."
Note: even the 1st runner up never said that - I listened intently to the press conference the 1st runner up had after the elections.
But what he really meant was: "Our gut feeling from our hearts of hearts is that we won, and we have faith that by some miracle when we get to court, we'll discover results that match our gut feeling."
It's now clear that he made that statement in bad faith.
Now that the SC has handed down its decision, can he please humour us and publicly release the results that show he won.
Or forever keep his peace!
@001Achiever So they didn’t have their own polling agents? Or they didn’t know whether they won or not? If so, on what basis then did he claim they won?
He said: "We won and we'll prove it in court."
Note: even the 1st runner up never said that - I listened intently to the press conference the 1st runner up had after the elections.
But what he really meant was: "Our gut feeling from our hearts of hearts is that we won, and we have faith that by some miracle when we get to court, we'll discover results that match our gut feeling."
It's now clear that he made that statement in bad faith.
Now that the SC has handed down its decision, can he please humour us and publicly release the results that show he won.
Or forever keep his peace!
He said: "We won and we'll prove it in court."
Note: even the 1st runner up never said that - I listened intently to the press conference the 1st runner up had after the elections.
But what he really meant was: "Our gut feeling from our hearts of hearts is that we won, and we have faith that by some miracle when we get to court, we'll discover results that match our gut feeling."
It's now clear that he made that statement in bad faith.
Now that the SC has handed down its decision, can he please humour us and publicly release the results that show he won.
Or forever keep his peace!
He said: "We won and we'll prove it in court."
Note: even the 1st runner up never said that - I listened intently to the press conference the 1st runner up had after the elections.
But what he really meant was: "Our gut feeling from our hearts of hearts is that we won, and we have faith that by some miracle when we get to court, we'll discover results that match our gut feeling."
It's now clear that he made that statement in bad faith.
Now that the SC has handed down its decision, can he please humour us and publicly release the results that show he won.
Or forever keep his peace!
@OnCourse101 @obyezeks Keep up the entertainment.
Hope you can keep it up for the next 4 years for those that have nothing better to do with their time.
Keep up your failed attempts to discredit the piece below.
Thankfully, she can speak for herself since she made the post herself. Will see what reasons she will offer. I assume she doesn’t have any evidence that the Justices were bribed. So, I assume she’s drawing her inferences from the reasoning of their judgment. So, I will await her reasoning as to which aspects of the court’s reasoning she questions and why. Making this sort of conclusory statements without more is not what I expect from someone of her supposed stature in our polity.
@ChidiOdinkalu@inecnigeria Can you elaborate? This is too succinct to enable anyone understand what you’re getting at. What aspects of their judgment do you have an issue with? Presumably not all aspects.
I didn’t hear anything about the forfeiture matter in the SC’s judgment. That issue was raised only in Peter Obi’s appeal. While I agree with the Court of Appeal’s reasoning on that, the SC must still cover that. I assume it is going to be in their written judgment and that it was just an oversight in mentioning it when they delivered the judgment in summary in open court.
I think so. Even when third party vendors are used, those are vendors authorized by the school, so, by “not emanating” that should cover their authorized agents.
In any event for a school that doesn’t keep copies of replacement orders or certificates, they would never be able to say that it never emanated from them especially as it matches the format of certificates they’ve issued in the past.