ಗುರುವೇ,
Presence of mind (ಪ್ರಜ್ಞೆ ಮತ್ತು ವಿವೇಕ ಒಳಗೊಂಡ) ಅಲ್ಲಿ,, ಪ್ರತಿ ಕ್ಷಣದಲ್ಲಿಯೂ ಇರುವ ಹಾಗೆ ಒಂದು techniques ಬೇಕು ಎಂದೆನಿಸುತ್ತಿದೆ...
@SeekFromSri@SriSamsthana
ನಿಮ್ಮ ಸ್ಮರಣೆ ಈ ಸಮಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಬೇಕೇ ಬೇಕೆಂದು ಕಂಡುಕೊಳ್ಳುವ ಬಗೆ ಹೇಗೆ,?
ಕೆಲವೊಮ್ಮೆ ಕೆಲವು ಘಟನೆಗಳಾದ ಮೇಲೆ ಸ್ಮರಿಸಲೆ ಇಲ್ಲವೇ, ಎಂದಾಗುವುದಲ್ಲವೇ...!
(ಇದು ದಿನನಿತ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಮರಿಸುವದಲ್ಲಾ, ಏನಾದರೂ ಸ್ಮರಿಸುವಂತಹ ಕ್ಷಣವಿದ್ದಾಗ) ಸರಿಯಾದ ಸಮಯ ಇದೆಂದು ಕಂಡುಕೊಳ್ಳುವುದು ಹೇಗೆ.
@SriSamsthana.@SeekFromSri.
@dhanyarajendran Justice S G Pandit:
He is the ardent devotee of the Matha & the Swamiji. Hence, going by the ethics of the law, the judge recused.
(7)
@dhanyarajendran Justice Mohammad Nawaz:
His lordship recused stating the reasons that when he was SPP earlier, drafted the revision petition against the Swamiji, filed by State challenging the Discharge Order.
Hence, going by the ethics of the law, the judge recused.
(5)
@dhanyarajendran Justice Phaneendra:
Petitions were submitted to President, CJI etc against Judge by so-called victim's brother alleging they have no trust with Judge;& same was submitted before judge by them. So the judge recused.
Important Note:Petitions were submitted by them, not by Swamiji
@dhanyarajendran Now, let us see in the following thread about why few judges opted recusal, and how it is NOT because of any pressure from Swamiji's side:
(3)
@dhanyarajendran * At the same time, Honnavar court directed for criminal proceedings on so-called victim by stating the case as a conspiracy & issued summons; which is upheld by Dharwad HC.
(2)
@dhanyarajendran Very important facts to be considered in the case:
* Bangalore Sessions court has discharged the charges by clearly stating: rape accusations by so-called victim is false and a conspiracy.
(1)