Summoning my favourite protocols [TAG PROTOCOLS WHO SHOULD JOIN] to join the movement!
ETHGas is introducing the Open Gas Initiative, eliminating gas fees from the end-user experience
Learn more: https://t.co/P4NbaVeAtg
https://t.co/VFYTZoaqgB
Introducing the Open Gas Initiative - a way for protocols to subsidize gas for users, zero-code, for a seamless, frictionless onchain experience.
With OG cohort: @eigencloud, @ether_fi, @pendle_fi, @Velvet_Capital.
👇
Discovered my Gas ID via ETHGas - turning my gas spend into rewards 🫘
As a Kiddo Jack, I've spent 0.1633 ETH on gas but earned 50 Beans back.
Get your Gas ID and Beans here: https://t.co/0C4fzEQJpu
Dear @Polymarket, I really love your platform, but this shouldn’t stay in the shadows.
Do you consider it normal that people can place predictions on whether some territory in Ukraine might be captured by a certain date? That people can speculate on a war where real people are dying after being attacked by another country? This is not Call of Duty, this is the real world and a very terrifying war. I am Ukrainian, I live in Ukraine, and seeing this is deeply inappropriate and triggers very painful emotions. Meanwhile, someone is placing a bet that Pokrovsk will be captured before November 30 just to make money, it feels surreal.
This is simply obscene and goes against all common sense. Please remove the ability to bet on such events.
I wanted to become your ambassador and have supported the project for a long time, actively sharing it with my audience, but actions like this undermine that trust, and you are a very serious organization.
I hope you make the right decision. Ukrainians are not guilty for being attacked and destroyed every day, but speculating on this means making money on people’s blood. God sees everything, and do not forget about karma.
💰 Honestly, talking about tokenomics is a thankless job. But it determines a huge amount. Many projects took off precisely because of well-designed tokenomics, while many others died because it was full of holes. The hardest part is finding the golden mean: making it profitable for ordinary people to hold the token, while ensuring the project confidently develops in the long term.
🏆 The @cosmos team’s proposal is genuinely well-thought-out: technically rock-solid, it theoretically solves a ton of current blockchain industry problems, and remains fully practical to implement.
😱 The experience of other projects clearly shows: abrupt tokenomics changes almost always trigger a storm of criticism, heated debates, an outflow of holders and delegators, and — most painfully — the loss of the most valuable validators. But the most important thing is that in the long term, such complex mechanics and modest rewards simply cease to attract newcomers.
🥇Ideal tokenomics should be:
🔷 As simple as possible — so even a fifth-grader can understand it.
🔷 Extremely attractive — so people actually want to tell their friends about it (free and most effective marketing).
🔷 Generous enough — so holders have a real incentive to keep and accumulate the token.
🤝 In my opinion, there are several directions and actions that can genuinely bring benefits, community support, and an influx of new users:
✅ $ATOM staking mechanics have attracted a huge number of new users over the long term. Right now ~57% of all $ATOM is staked — one of the highest ratios among L1 chains. Changing something that works so well is far from the best idea.
✅ Token burning has a positive long-term effect on the economy. The key is to find a sustainable source of ATOM that can be directed toward burning.
✅ Reducing the number of active validators to ~150 is a good starting compromise. Small and medium-sized validators clearly contribute more to the development of the @cosmoshub than many large ones. The amount of $ATOM staked should not remain the primary criterion for excluding validators from the active list.
✅ One option might be to consider launching official staking of liquidity from the Cosmos Hub (stATOM). This would generate additional ATOM from collected fees, which could then be used for burning.
✅ NFTs are an important cultural part of the Cosmos ecosystem: there are plenty of great collections and highly active communities (@madscientists_x, @expedition_pics, @DeFiGeeksNFT, @badkidsart and others). It’s worth considering acquiring abandoned NFT marketplaces (like @Amburxyz or @Pallet_Exchange) at a reasonable price, or reaching out and sitting down for negotiations with the @StargazeZone team. The option of adding the Cosmos Hub network to @MagicEden and @opensea looks particularly promising and exciting. In my opinion, this could attract new users and become an additional source of $ATOM for burning.
❌ The new tokenomics proposed by the Cosmos Hub team do not align with the interests of our community, the long-term marketing prospects of Cosmos, or the interests of our validator. With all due respect to the tremendous work done by the team, we will most likely not be able to support this proposal. What do you think?
@cosmoshub@cosmoslabs_io@cosmos $Atom
⚛️ Dear Cosmos Team,
✅ At Chiter in Cosmos ⚛️ (https://t.co/iNFstk6ynu), we are a dedicated and vibrant Telegram community from the CIS, united by our love for the Cosmos ecosystem. Though small, our 5,500-strong community is a powerhouse of active, engaged users who live and breathe Cosmos. For two years, we’ve been a steady presence, celebrating Cosmos’s triumphs, navigating its challenges, and amplifying its potential.
🤝 We’re not a fleeting project. Our members are deeply committed to the Cosmos ecosystem, consistently delivering value through:
🔹In-depth coverage of the latest Cosmos news
🔹 Thoughtful reviews of Cosmos projects
🔹Comprehensive guides for testnets and activities
🔹 Active participation in NFT mints and airdrop opportunities
🎯 While we’ve only recently joined Twitter, our focus remains unwavering: to champion the Cosmos ecosystem and foster its growth. Our 5,500 members aren’t just followers—they’re an army of active contributors, builders, and believers in Cosmos’s vision.
🤠 On August 23, 2025, we took a bold step forward by launching the Chiter in Cosmos ⚛️ validator on the Cosmos Hub. In just 52 days, we’ve earned the trust of 636 delegators, collectively staking over 100,000 $ATOM. While this places us at 150th out of 180 validators, for a CIS Telegram community, this is a remarkable achievement—a testament to our dedication and the trust we’ve built.
🏆 We are committed to growing alongside Cosmos, supporting its development, and aligning with the vision of its new team. To continue this journey, we humbly request your support. A delegation from the Cosmos team would not only validate our efforts but also empower our community to contribute even more meaningfully to the ecosystem.
🚀 By partnering with Chiter in Cosmos ⚛️ , you’re investing in a passionate, reliable, and growing community that shares your commitment to Cosmos’s success. We believe that together, we can amplify the ecosystem’s reach and impact.
🙏 Please consider sending a delegation to support our validator and our thriving community. Let’s build the future of Cosmos together!
With gratitude,
Chiter in Cosmos ⚛️
https://t.co/UGIECZO8Oa
@0xMagmar , @qxnico, @vladjdk, @cosmoshub, @cosmos, @cosmoslabs_io
📊 History shows that those who don't buy $Atom at the very bottom are left kicking themselves and buying when $Atom on ATH.
🤟 This is not financial advice; the choice is always yours.
@cosmoshub@cosmos#Cosmos
@0xfoobar, friend, two months of silence on @clustersxyz is alarming. No news, no activity on X. Is the project still alive? Or has all the focus shifted to @CircuitAI? What is the relationship between these projects and @delegatedotxyz, released by the same team, @SelvLabs?
Is there a roadmap for clusters? Users simply don't understand whether they need to renew their names...
It's time to open up to your users and supporters and share your immediate plans.
🚀 It's no secret that @cosmoshub boasts an impressive array of products, projects, technical capabilities, and a vibrant community. However, several unresolved issues have persisted since the project's inception.
✅ The Chiter in Cosmos validator ⚛️ team would like to share ideas and suggestions from our community with @0xMagmar and the @cosmos team for consideration. If any of these suggestions prove valuable for the development of the @cosmoslabs_io, we’d be delighted to hear your feedback!
1) Cosmos Hub as a Unified Platform
We envision the Cosmos Hub as a comprehensive, all-encompassing platform that unites the entire ecosystem. Cosmos includes projects like @osmosis, @StargazeZone, @dYdX, @injective, @Polaris_App, @babyloneco, Eureka, IBC, @StreamSwap_io, @NolusProtocol, DaoDao, @Levana_protocol, @stride_zone, Noble, and more. However, as users, it’s challenging to stay informed about all these projects. While the technical implementation and coordination with project teams may be complex, users want a single platform—such as the Cosmos Hub—where they can:
🔹 Connect with any wallet (e.g., @keplrwallet, @MetaMask, @phantom).
🔹 Easily deposit funds in their preferred network and currency.
🔹 Perform desired actions, such as exchanging assets, buying coins on the spot market, trading futures, purchasing NFTs, sending funds to lending platforms, taking out loans, participating in launchpads for new projects, or buying synthetic assets and shares of top companies.
The platform should also support seamless onboarding with fiat gateways and compatibility with wallets like Keplr, MetaMask, and Phantom. The goal is to prevent projects from operating in isolation and to ensure the Cosmos ecosystem doesn’t remain a mere sandbox for developing "gems." Instead, we should consolidate the best features of these projects into a unified, user-friendly platform.
2) Marketing and Grants
Cosmos has long struggled with insufficient marketing and ongoing debates over grant distribution, as well as limited support for influencers and community initiatives. These issues can be addressed without relying on tools like Kaito. A straightforward referral program could resolve many of these challenges. For example, a portion of commissions or a reward pool could be distributed to individuals who bring active users to specific projects or platforms.
3) $ATOM Token Price
To address concerns about the $ATOM token price:
🔹 Consider reducing inflation or transitioning to a deflationary model.
🔹 Partner with new projects to include ATOM stakers in airdrops.
🔹 Stop distributing rewards to validators who do not actively contribute to the Cosmos Hub’s development. Some “vampire” validators collect rewards and sell off tokens without supporting the ecosystem’s growth.
4) @coinbase partnership
Coinbase is a major investor in the $ATOM token but currently has no active involvement in the development of the Cosmos Hub. Why not establish closer collaboration to create a win-win partnership for both parties?
🫶 Sincerely, Cosmos Hub validator - Chiter in Cosmos ⚛️.