@baxstboys How about if, as a country, we elected a felon rapist pedo/pedo protecting crook, we've gone too far...
It's not that hard to understand why he shouldn't be considered a standard president
@JoshPateCFB Get a clue. There is no other president like Trump, so you should NOT just apply a dumbass blanket statement like IT DOESN'T MATTER WHICH PRESIDENT called. Yes. It fucking does. If it doesn't, you are being dense, spineless, and complicit. That's it. Period.
@DylanEveryday Get a clue. There is no other president like Trump, so you should NOT just apply a dumbass blanket statement like IT DOESN'T MATTER WHICH PRESIDENT called. Yes. It fucking does. If it doesn't, you are being dense, spineless, and complicit. That's it. Period.
@JoshPateCFB You willingly interviewed a rapist/pedo and you're answer is, "hey guys, be cool about this, geez..." after insisting that you HAD to do the interview when presented the opportunity. Just admit it was a sellout, complicit, tone-deaf, boot-licking decision. THAT's rational.
@TravisSkol Understanding why this is a problematic and, frankly, manipulative interview is not difficult, and it is frustrating seeing people pretending they don't see this as the distraction it is.
@BoersBurner That is a legitimately stupid take. No one is claiming he doesn't have the right to do the interview. That's obvious. But you absolutely do not HAVE to do the interview, and you shouldn't. You be remembered as chumming it up with a known criminal.
@alex_kirshner No... No, I wouldn't. I would be able to see the intent behind trying to distract from the pedo scandals by talking football to idiots who will eat it up.
@JoshPateCFB Pate being used to gain points and distract from the pedo scandals. That should NOT be an automatic yes. That's idiotic and complicit thinking.