I know the arguments for normalization and the efficiency of modern rdbms, but there's always a part of me that looks at a few 100b of data spread across a dozen tables and all accessed together and gets sad thinking about how much easier some nested structs and arrays would be.
One of my great regrets in life is not having grown up in a culture where being able to dance well was a standard path to impressing girls. I would probably be a good dancer.
Instead, I can play a few Dave Matthews songs on guitar.
I seem to be on the same evening walk schedule as a rather large urban coyote; we see it most nights now.
Would seem cool if my dog wasn't desperate to play with it.
@jamesacowling I was mostly feeling odd about the asymmetry of asking folks to spend time on a survey that'll probably be summarized to a few lines by AI when the employer doesn't spend the effort to talk, but yeah it's also very different signal quality. I suspect subtext is text ½ the time..
Given that my previous experience with reference checks was "you list a couple names, and nobody probably calls them", interacting with a system that wants detailed personal info about them and then sends them an automated survey about you feels a bit jarring.
Saw some coding interview prep guidance that recommends familiarizing yourself with 4 or 5 sorting algorithms at the same level it recommends being aware of hash tables.
That strikes me as crazy. Is that crazy?
I've impled most of the classics, but >99.999% of code calls 'sort'.
I used to push back on this via youthful arrogance and obliviousness, but the fact that I frame seeing myself as capable as based in personality flaws says I probably have more work to do.
It's not ideal for me professionally that I come from a household culture of not taking credit, always taking blame, if I can do it it's not that impressive, and if it's important there's probably someone more qualified.
I have the specific kind of anxiety that comes from responding to multiple Calendar Availability forms with the same days without having yet heard back.
I vaguely understood it to be an international military cooperation thing, which isn't nearly enough to understand it's significant geopolitical relevance over the last decade or so.
I get the sense that more Americans are ignorant of the purpose and history of NATO than should be. I know I was, likely despite my HS teachers efforts.