@ToddTruitt76508 @gdavis451 @MichaelPetrilli In theory, sure. In practice?
You could still measure accountability with time-to-benchmark measures, but you wouldn't have the logistical crunch and year-end decompression that seems to be the subject of all the up-thread ire.
@gdavis451 @MichaelPetrilli@ToddTruitt76508 What if standardized tests were restructured from "ready or not, everyone take it" to "everyone take it when you're ready". Then instead of charting how many kids we label as failures, we could chart everyone's timelines of achievement?
From history_4_humans on IG: “‘What do you think we will learn tomorrow?’ or, ‘What do you think will happen next in regards to X?’ are two great exit pass questions.”
@teachbk I love it. Best feedback I've ever received:
1. My own realizations when I see someone else do something I wouldn't have thought of.
2. Questions from colleagues that lead me to introspection.
3. 3rd party observations of student actions I didn't notice from my POV.
@Mr_McGarrah Reading back through this after referring to it in a Facebook comment earlier. Two things come to mind:
1. Apples and oranges? More like raisins and Pomegranates.
2. Of course charters have "accountability"... They are the ones serving the poor kids of color. Gotta measure 'em.
While @Mr_McGarrah was digging into the teacher pay plans in #ArkansaSLEARNS#SB294, I've been looking at the voucher side of things with this this survey of the private and charter school landscape:
https://t.co/dVbOKfE1qR
@Trianglemancsd Why? It seems like a very accessible way to communicate the idea of disordered processing of reality. I'm trying to think of better ways of expressing it without implying wholesale brokenness, and can't come up with any. Maybe I'll ask ChatGPT. 🤖
@Trianglemancsd AI hallucinations are only "incorrect" or "nonsense" when evaluated in the context of precise calculation questions with known (or knowable) specific solutions. That sort of question is (for now) outside the domain of (most?) LLM functionality.
It's just not their purpose (yet).
@Trianglemancsd "Hallucinate" is actually a pretty good anthropomorphic analogy. LLMs are not just outputting nonsense; they're producing unexpected or inconsistent outputs based on statistical models.
This isn't that different from the disordered hallucinatory firing of bio neural connections.
@alicekeeler I've often said assessment is a DOK-4 task. Teaching as a humanities pursuit is another interesting framing... Has me thinking about single- and double-blind research studies, and Goodhart's law in economics.
Why don't we consider these crossover ideas in education more often?
Final grades are inevitable, but not based on an inaccurate (and biased) math formula. We bow to math as if it is smarter than us. It's not. Teaching is a humanities profession & calculators can not capture what we can capture in terms of our knowledge of a students capabilities.
Students don't need everything they write to be rigorously graded. That actually intensifies their anxiety. They need a lot of low risk practice writing across contexts w/out intense surveillance.