Lou

conservative,anti left,anti woke,Global warming skeptic, Animal lover,

[dejanira @dejanirasilveir]

🚨🚨EL VÍDEO MÁS PODEROSO QUE VERÁS HOY.

John Clauser, Premio Nobel de Física y 1,500 Cientificos más en Quantum Korea dicen:

"NO EXISTE Cambio Climático, NO EXISTE Emergencia Climática"

El Dr. Clause Agregó: "La narrativa del Cambio Climático es una PELIGROSA CORRUPCIÓN QUE AMENAZA LA ECONÓMIA A NIVEL GLOBAL" ⚔️🔥

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

A dog gets a massage from a cat and in return gently scratches the cat’s back

[HealthRanger @HealthRanger]

Sunscreen CAUSES skin cancer. I've been shouting the truth on this for 20+ years.

If you are using conventional sunscreen products, you've been suckered into giving yourself cancer, to generate financial profits for the cancer industry while you suffer and pay.

[Mr. Nobody @MmisterNobody]

The sunscreen industry boomed after the 1970s, promising “protection” from the sun.

But in the decades that followed, skin cancer kept climbing at an alarming pace.

Starting to get it yet?

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

STUDY FINDS SUNSCREEN USE LINKED TO DRAMATICALLY HIGHER RISK OF MULTIPLE SKIN CANCERS

A UK Biobank analysis of 470,000+ people found sunscreen users faced significantly higher risk of:

- MELANOMA: +292%
- BASAL CELL CARCINOMA: +140%
- SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: +126%

This is what happens when you slather rapidly absorbed hormone disrupting chemicals all over your body while blocking vitamin D — one of the body’s key defenses against cancer.

These dramatic cancer signals remained even after accounting for major skin cancer risk factors: age, sex, skin type, tanning ability, sunburn history, sunlamp use, and time spent outdoors.

[Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏 @TruthFairy131]

They call people that don’t want innocent White people being stabbed, having their eyes gouged out & beheaded ‘far right’.

These same people are responsible for bringing the savages committing these horrific crimes into our nations.

They lie, gaslight, deflect blame & just allow the crime & violence to grow & spread.

They protect the foreign perpetrators of these violent crimes.

Now they act selectively outraged that desperate people that see no other options available have reacted & are trying to take matters into their own hands.

The government did this. They are responsible.

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

Wind and solar aren't the future - they are a high-maintenance, low-yield, asset-degrading collection of unreliable gadgetry.

Ultimately, the actual physics makes them exceptionally intermittent and they fail to deliver a true net profit to everyone who was forced to subsidise them. We are told wind and solar are the limitless, romantic future of energy. But when you strip away the romance, they are not pristine monuments to progress.

The reality is, they are complex jumbles of electronics, specialised glass, composite blades and concrete foundations. Like any domestic appliance, they degrade, malfunction and eventually they just wear out, sooner rather than later.

Whether it is a 'minor rural block' or a massive multi-million-dollar commercial farm, the financial equation is plagued by intermittency. Because these technologies only work sometimes, they require trillions in redundant grid infrastructure, backup gas plants, or toxic, short-lived battery arrays just to keep the lights on.

The narrative promises clean, free power from the sky. But both wind and solar are bound by physical barriers that guarantee they can never deliver the promised utopian returns.

A wind turbine cannot simply absorb all the energy passing through it. In 1919, physicist Albert Betz proved that if a turbine extracted 100% of the wind’s kinetic energy, the air behind the blades would stop moving entirely, blocking any new wind from entering. The absolute mathematical maximum efficiency for any open-airflow turbine is 59.3%.

Because of this physical wall, real-world utility turbines max out at around 45% efficiency in perfect conditions. But because the wind rarely blows at perfect speeds, their actual annual average output (capacity factor) globally sits at a dismal 25% to 40% depending on location. They aren't magical power plants; they are mechanical bottlenecks.

Solar panels face an equally rigid thermodynamic wall. Standard silicon panels have a maximum theoretical efficiency of roughly 33% because nearly half of all incoming solar energy is simply too powerful to be captured and is instantly lost as heat, while another chunk of photons passes right through the material like a ghost.

Millions of homeowners who bought into rooftop solar since the late 2000s are discovering the financial math didn't hold up. As early subsidies and high buy-back tariffs evaporated, owners were left with creeping daily grid supply charges and degrading panels.

After only 10 to 15 years, the costly inverters fail, leaving properties with expensive, non-functioning roof clutter.

[UNN @UnityNewsNet]

AI Data Centres are set to produce 400 MILLION TONS of carbon dioxide globally which is more than the current emissions of the whole of Britain.

Ed Miliband says we must all personally cut our emissions and support the 'green revolution'.

Yet at the same time he fully supports these Data Centres.

Couldn't possibly be he is just a pathological liar and subversive trying to destroy the country?

[🛑 mocking the PEOPLE @alextopol]

⚠️🚨STOP CALLING THEM DATA CENTERS, THEY ARE SURVEILLANCE CENTERS 🚨⚠️

There can only be one reason for the construction of huge SURVEILLANCE centres everywhere across the WORLD all at the same time, and that is for the collection of all human transactions, behavioural traits,

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇬🇧 Belfast is shutting down.

Several streets and roads across the city are now completely blocked by protesters.

This after a Sudanese migrant allegedly tried to behead a local man

When the state fails, the people react. Belfast is making that very clear right now.

Source: Insider Paper / Writer: Oliver

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

Global warming saves lives.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

The direction of travel has already been set by the ‘useless eliters’ the only question is where are you going to say “stop no more ?”.

[karma @karma44921039]

Their not bothered about the human race were dealing with psychopaths.

[Valerie 🤌🏻 @AussieVal10]

The government gets $20K in taxes from the people every second in Aus…the government now begging you to donate $27 to Labor to fight @OneNationAus

Who in their right mind would donating to Labor to continue ruining Australia?

I would rather swim with sharks.

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

Field experiments are being carried out into claims of nutrient depletion and reduced health benefits when crops are grown under elevated CO₂ concentrations.

The basis for these experiments has already been disproved by decades of successful commercial greenhouse agriculture. CO₂ levels are routinely boosted to above 1,000 to 1,250 ppm. This is a multi-billion-dollar industry and there has never been any suggestion that the photosynthesis from higher CO₂ leads to nutrition depletion or any other type of potential health risks.

Greenhouse growers deliberately augment nutrients, water and soil chemistry alongside the gas levels to maximise yield. FACE experiments, by design, purposefully omit these adjustments to see what happens to unmanaged ecosystems or crops under elevated CO₂.

These studies — known as Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) — involve field experiments to examine the health and food properties of crops and ecosystems under elevated CO₂ levels under open-air conditions. The purpose is to examine whether higher CO₂ and rapid growth will overstress plants and cause depleted nutrients. The experiments typically set elevated CO₂ concentrations at 550 to 600 ppm; current atmospheric CO₂ is 426 ppm.

The exact target concentration varies, but some specialised studies push the CO₂ target up to 730 ppm to simulate future worst-case scenarios. The elevated CO₂ serves as a proxy for atmospheric conditions projected to occur around the mid-21st century.

But farming practice has already established that any sudden growth will generally outstrip available nutrient levels, though this dilution is only temporary. In some of the experiments, the nutrient deficiency had only fallen by around 3%. Plants experiencing a growth spurt simply need time for nutrient values to be rebalanced by the rich subsoil networks that supply nutrients and nitrogen to root systems.

This underground support network chiefly includes widespread mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria (nitrogen-fixing microbes), demonstrating a mutually beneficial symbiotic association between soil life and plant roots.

Satellite studies by NASA covering more than 20 years have revealed a widespread expansion in green leaf areas around the world, plus verified increases in rates of agricultural food production. This green leaf expansion is the largest in modern history.

The aim of FACE experiments appears to seek counter-arguments to this green leaf expansion, largely attributed to higher CO₂.

IMAGE: The architecture of a Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) experiment. Source: EucFACE Experiment

[dejanira @dejanirasilveir]

🚨💥SE PRENDIÓ BERLIN 🔥ALEMANIA 🇩🇪 HA DESPERTADO 🔥

¡Miles de patriotas alemanes han tomado las calles en una de las protestas más grandes, "1 Millón de personas"! 🔥

Exigen un cambio de gobierno, que ha destruido Alemania a través de la migración masiva y la financiación de guerras extranjeras.

No lo verás en los medios de comunicación COMPARTE por todas partes 🔥

[Ounka @OunkaOnX]

Greenwald just said the quiet part out loud: The US president wants to end a war. He can't. Because a foreign lobby - and a foreign government - have more power over American foreign policy than the American people, Congress, or the president himself

[Laura Aboli Official @LauraAboli_X]

Signal is 100% right.

The greatest trick governments ever pulled was convincing people that freedom and privacy are obstacles to safety.

What we are witnessing is not child protection. It is the construction of a surveillance architecture that will eventually monitor, profile, categorize and control every aspect of our digital lives.

Today it is age verification and content scanning, tomorrow it is digital identity, then financial monitoring, then behavioural scoring, then access to services conditioned on compliance.

The destination is not difficult to see. It is a technocratic system where every interaction is tracked, every transaction recorded, every opinion assessed and every citizen reduced to a data profile managed by governments and corporations working hand in hand.

A form of digital neo feudalism where a small unelected class controls the platforms, the infrastructure, the money and ultimately the boundaries of acceptable behaviour.

The argument that only criminals should fear surveillance is as absurd as saying only criminals need freedom of speech. Privacy is not evidence of wrongdoing, it is the foundation of human dignity, individual sovereignty and genuine liberty.

The UK government is asking citizens to accept the presumption of guilt simply to communicate online. To prove who they are, verify their age and allow their devices to inspect their content before they can participate in modern society.

History teaches us that every power granted to the state eventually expands beyond its initial mandate. The technology introduced to detect one form of content today will be used to police entirely different forms of expression tomorrow.

The choice before us is not between privacy and child protection, it is between preserving a free society, or constructing the infrastructure of a digital prison that will further enslave us.

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

What a difference.

[Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺 @MRobertsQLD]

Australians are seeing through Labor’s spin and lies

Reality is dawning