@Panchenko_X Nobody anywhere has a complete education, but the majority of people find work doing various occupations. That is one aspect of this that will, one way or another, look after itself.
@nexta_tv He does realise that if nobody listened to either, he wouldn't waste his time asking for them to be shut down? Try coming up with plausible lies last time.
@qiaohuanxin That is not the way to speak to someone telling you the truth. Deepseek was blocked due to failure to follow laws (privacy laws). Same with Tiktok (but in that case it was data security; the whole "sell TikTok to USA" thing came about because of data security failures).
@cobhale I don't think he outright hates Charles (though I don't think he's a fan either), he's simply trying to defend the driver assigned to him without having much to defend him with.
@GilesRocholl Increasingly, only deliberately deceitful alt-right people are welcome (with some others tolerated), if the increased censorship of reasonable people is anything to go by.
@sean7232 Lots of people who have never sent a toxic tweet in their lives are leaving. You might not have heard of those people, but it's happening in droves.
@formulamadnesss Leclerc cares about Sainz, otherwise he wouldn't have said a word on Saturday. Even after all the aggravation, he cares enough to make one last try at getting the point across that Sainz needs to shape up and start helping rather than hindering Ferrari.
@premystic @Style73Fashion But not the sort of engagement that drives audiences. There's been a backlash against ragebait-based advertising over the last 18 months.
@premystic That says F1 and its drivers draw attention. It does not say whether influencers draw attention to F1. (I'm assuming the evidence exists, it just might be hidden away rather than in public documentation).