@TruthOverSpin01@Ditzo22@HxNick69994@Timcast Blurry video, no proof the rifle was fired, no bullet, no GSR test, DNA on his own belongings along with Lance Twiggs DNA, and unvarified texts, no bullet found in Charlie (testimony they were normal bullets which debunks the theory it was a frangible bullet.
@MAGAMAHACindy Just a bit of proof would be nice. We have too much technology for this crap. They have presented nothing so far that we didn’t already know. Blurry videos with time gaps. Epstein all over again
@Niccali777@martinez_j7902 Correct. They knew he was being targeted and was advised by a family friend to go to the police for his own protection. He may have had some kind of task to do along with many others, but he did not do this on his own and that gun did not kill Charlie Kirk. No proof it was shot
@OfVoice35353@Aric333@Joshua_the_car Defense has been asking for the metadata and it still hasn’t been handed over so they have to go with hearsay for now.
@AshtonForbes@gatorgar Don’t know what you are watching but we are 4 days in and still have no actual proof. Looks like a set up to me. The police have had plenty of time to pull actual evidence even though this is just preliminary.