CCRC

*/acc

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

It’s 2026, and universities like UC Berkeley still force us to manage our lives using terrible, last-century UIs, endless PDFs, and a million URLs. The tangled maze of course dependencies leaves you frustrated, staring at a wall of 50 open browser tabs, still clueless. Yet underneath it all, this is just a logical network that can be booleanized and API-driven.

The physical world desperately lacks standard REST APIs. If college systems were as clean and efficient as Binance or Bybit, we could use AI agents to elegantly orchestrate our lives instead of drowning in information overload. Public data (course catalogs, prerequisites) should be open via public GET endpoints—just like fetching BTC market data. Private data should be securely accessible via student-generated private keys. 100% compliant, zero data leaks.

Complaining stops now. I’m building a new project to abstract these real-world constraints and unstructured bureaucracies into APIs and declarative configurations built for developers and agents. This isn’t about outsourcing responsibility for your future to an agent—it’s about using technology to amplify your own agency.

Real change in the 21st century starts by rewriting the underlying logic of legacy systems. If you're a hacker wanting to build something actually cool, DM me. Let’s go. 🚀 #Berkeley #College #Agent

[Laurent @scion_x_]

Tout ce que tu utilises a été construit par quelqu'un qu'on méprisait pendant qu'il le construisait.

Le train allait rendre les passagers fous. L'ampoule était un gadget de foire. L'avion, un caprice de riches. La voiture ne remplacerait jamais le cheval. L'ordinateur personnel ne servirait à rien. Internet était une mode. Les fusées réutilisables, une fantaisie, jusqu'à ce qu'elles atterrissent.

À chaque époque, la même distribution des rôles. D'un côté, des gens qui essaient, se trompent, recommencent. De l'autre, des gens qui expliquent doctement pourquoi ça ne marchera pas.

Les seconds ont choisi le métier confortable. Le commentaire ne connaît ni la panne, ni la dette, ni la nuit blanche. Il produit du jugement, la seule industrie qui tourne sans usine.

Et note l'asymétrie : l'histoire a retenu le nom des frères Wright. Personne ne cite leurs éditorialistes.

On te recrute en permanence pour le camp des commentateurs. C'est le plus facile d'accès, aucune compétence exigée, l'indignation suffit. On t'y promet même une réputation d'esprit critique.

Mais le monde ne se divise pas entre la droite et la gauche, ni entre le haut et le bas. Il se divise entre ceux qui construisent et ceux qui regardent construire en distribuant des notes.

Les bâtisseurs n'ont jamais gagné le débat. Ils ont construit pendant que les autres débattaient.

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

My friend found it in Chinese TikTok so it blocked some words🤔

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

I hope 4chan can be more neat so I have more motivation to browse

[Beff (e/acc) @beffjezos]

First make it exist.
Then you can make it better.

[Max For AI @MaxForAI]

刷到这条AI也代替不了科班出身的帖子，给我看乐了😅

一堆人揪着大V卡兹克居然不懂CDN这种细节较劲。

然后搁哪里沾沾自喜："看，还是得靠我们专业科班出身的"。

不太明白这些人在沾沾自喜什么….

前段时间胡彦斌Vibe coding做的app有漏洞，也有一堆人在哪里弹冠相庆。

我提醒一下这些朋友们，现在“非科班“的人会有很多低级问题，本质原因是因为AI还不够强。

明天、后天，这些漏洞会越来越少。

还在这守着“今天的知识差距”当护城河，本质上是在赌AI不会进步。

这事真正的重点���本不是“科班有没有优势”，而是AI第一次让一个人可以低成本跨越到自己完全不属于的领域，去理解、去搭建、去产出。

这才是范式转移。

所以问题应该反过来问：你们本来就在自己领域很懂的人，为什么不用AI或者软工去拿下别的领域，而是坐在自己的护城河里，靠指出别人的漏洞获得优越感？

不要拒绝进化。

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

@elonmusk @chamath archiving communism without abolishing property🤔

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

@JoelWBerry Immigrants are only brought in because they benefit the state by contributing and producing. It serves the state's welfare, not the immigrants'

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

@Zai_org 从一个用户的角度上讲，我更愿意用各种其它手段去体验GLM的SOTA模型而不是抢你家的coding plan

[Hayek-Club Weimar @WeimarClub]

Die moderne Sklaverei trägt keine Eisenketten mehr, sondern eine Steuernummer, eine Sozialversicherungsnummer, eine elektronische Patientenakte und bald einen digitalen Impf- und CO₂-Pass. Der Sklave von heute rennt nicht weg – er „meldet sich freiwillig“ an, weil er sonst nicht arbeiten, kein Konto eröffnen, kein Haus kaufen und nicht mal ein verdammtes Bier kaufen kann, ohne dass der Leviathan mitverdient.

Die Kaste, die hinter dem Konstrukt Staat steht, sagt dir nicht mehr „Du gehörst mir.“ Sie sagt:
„Du bist eine Ressource. Zahle uns 60 % deiner Leistungen als Zwangsabgabe, und wir geben dir mit großem Getöse einen Bruchteil davon als ‚Dienstleistung‘ zurück – meist schlechter und teurer, als der Markt es je könnte. Und wenn du dich wehrst, kommen die Leute mit den Waffen.“

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

@WinRAR_RARLAB @MyPaisa125027 It reminds me of Ultralytics' business model. They open sourced their project and marked its license as AGPL, which means that all projects based on their project should be open source and if you want to use it for commercial purposes you need to pay them (to me it's 5000$)

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Your AI hates Whites & Asians, especially Chinese, heterosexuals and men.

This is misanthropic and evil. Fix it.

Frankly, I don’t think there is anything you can do to escape the inevitable irony of Anthropic ending up being Misanthropic. You were doomed to this fate when you chose your name.

The Name of the Wind.

[Paul Graham @paulg]

Y Combinator makes something people who make something people want want.

[Curtis Yarvin @curtis_yarvin]

If you can’t see how libertarianism and communism could be first cousins, your historical camera is zoomed in too far. Zoom out to escape your Anglo bubble.

Yeah I know they hate each other. So do Shiites and Sunnis. Yes I know Marx was a German Jew and Hayek an Austrian

[Architechtonics @architecht0nics]

Curtis Yarvin is right here in the sense that Marx and Hayek are both offspring of Kantian critical philosophy. It's obvious in the case of Marx's Hegelianism, but Hayek's Kantianism is less noted, except by Hayek himself: "On these issues which will be my main concern, thought seems to have made little advance since David Hume and Immanuel Kant, and in several respects it will be at the point at which they left off that our analysis will have to resume."

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

@WinRAR_RARLAB It seems like everyone thinks WinRAR is free software

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

@advancedjd model rank is relative

[墓碑科技 @mubeitech]

因为受够了 Google Play 繁琐的规矩，一个 17 岁的乌兹别克斯坦少年干脆自己写了一个应用商店。

他写了个小软件，本来只想高高兴兴发布出去。
结果一查 Google 的要求，直接傻眼：
要交注册费，要上传政府 ID 验证身份，要验证家庭住址。
最离谱的是，还得强行凑齐 20 个测试员，连续测试 14 天。
这哪里是发布软件，这简直是在过堂。

普通人可能就放弃了，但这少年不服。
既然大平台不让玩，那就自己掀桌子。
他盯上了 GitHub。

我们知道，GitHub 只是个代码仓库。
很多开发者写完软件，会顺手把编译好的安装包（APK）扔进 GitHub Releases 里。
���对普通用户来说，去那里面翻安装包，比在垃圾堆里找钥匙还难。
更别提什么版本追踪和自动更新了。

于是，这个少年干脆自己写了一个应用商店，就叫 GitHub Store。

原理非常简单，但极其粗暴。
它直接去抓取 GitHub 上的开源发布包。
把那些藏在代码仓库里的软件，重新包装成一个手机应用商店的界面。
在里面，你可以一键搜索、一键安装、还能自动跟踪更新。

大平台用重重审核和繁琐门槛建立起来的“分发霸权”；
被一个 17 岁少年，用最开源的方式，直接给绕过去了。

它当然还不能完全替代 Google Play，安全和生态也还在早期。
但这件事最有意思的地方在于：
当一个平台开始变得臃肿、官僚、门槛高耸的时候，
总会有聪明人，用最直接的方式，把分发权和���择权，重新夺回普通人手里。

[CCRC @LambdaLinker]

@elonmusk @pmarca @peterrhague @neuralink cyber Jesus

[Palantir @PalantirTech]

Our thoughts on the importance of AI sovereignty.

1. Your AI sovereignty dictates your institution’s future. Sovereignty is the precondition for choice. Relinquishing sovereignty transfers the future choices of your institution to others, who are likely to exploit it for their gain and your loss.

2. Data retention is your treasure. Transfer it at your own peril. Your ability to win is dictated by your ability to recognize and use your unique edges, and you keep winning by compounding the underlying data to generate new insights. Transferring that data hands over access to your pre-existing winning plays and yields the means of production for new ones.

3. Tokenmaxxing hijacks your value orientation and decreases your institutional fortitude and intelligence. The pursuit of high token usage incentivizes disposable scripts over robust software — with the addictive feeling of false progress. There is a reason why those selling tokens refuse to charge based on value.

4. Controlling your weights is controlling your fate. Weights are the distilled form of hard-won, accumulated institutional knowledge. If you let others control your weights, you are allowing them to migrate the alpha of your business to theirs.

5. There is no contradiction between sovereignty and alpha. The architecture that maximally preserves sovereignty is one that enables institutions to own their tribal knowledge, and to compound it as alpha.

6. Politicizing the technical issues involving sovereignty is what your adversary wants. Techno-politicization is the wellspring of false sovereignty. Techno-politicization drives decisions that seem to reduce dependency, but ultimately limit agency — especially on the battlefield in the West.

7. Real expertise is existential. Allowing politics or favoritism to determine your technical decisions rewards whoever is best at politics, not whoever is right. Listen to those closest to the problems, not those speaking most compellingly about them.

8. Learn from institutions that are winning or that have consistently delivered. Institutions facing existential threats do not have the luxury of making technical decisions based on political preferences.

9. Only listen to institutions, countries, and people who have a proven record of being right. A track record of correctness is the best and only signal for future correctness. Judging something as right or wrong based on who you like is exceedingly misguided.

[CASSIUS @CassiusAnalyse]

Quand les premières fusées de SpaceX ont explosé l'une après l'autre, le monde entier s'est moqué : Un milliardaire de la tech qui jouait à l'astronaute, Un ego qui brûlait son argent dans le ciel, Les experts de l'aérospatiale le traitaient d'amateur.

Puis SpaceX a réussi ce que personne n'avait fait à cette échelle. Faire revenir une fusée se poser intacte après l'avoir lancée en orbite, et ravitailler la station spatiale, pendant que les géants installés du secteur regardaient. Les mêmes qui riaient l'ont sacré visionnaire. Le monde n'a pas changé d'avis sur l'homme. Il s'est incliné devant son résultat.

Retenez ça : On ne vous admire que lorsque vous gagnez. Avant, vous êtes toléré au mieux, moqu�� au pire, invisible entre les deux. Le monde n'a pas pitié de celui qui échoue. Il le condamne. Et il adore celui qui réussit, exactement la même action qu'il méprisait la veille.