🇨🇦 Medicine Hat, AB. Mom to an amazing son and ‘Nanny’ to the most precious. Critical thinker. Question everything. Freedom of choice for ALL. HOLD THE LINE!
Meanwhile in Guadeloupe 🇬🇵
One of the largest protests in Guadeloupe’s history took place today to stand up against vaccine passports and authoritarianism. Protests are happening all over the world and every week they get bigger.
#NoVaccinePassports
https://t.co/q24CGCRyUE
This retard in Canada is trying to pass a bill to make every July Somali Heritage Month.
Canada are always trying to outdo everyone when it comes to retardation
John Stuart Mill nailed Canada’s problem.
A free country cannot survive when one side controls the schools, media, bureaucracy, courts, and cultural institutions, then treats every serious objection as misinformation, hate, or extremism.
If your argument cannot survive open debate, it is not wisdom. It is weakness wearing a government badge.
Canada’s problem is not that Canadians disagree. Healthy countries disagree. The problem is that too many people in power no longer think they should have to answer the other side. They confuse slogans with thought and moral posing with truth.
Mill understood what our political class has forgotten: you do not even understand your own position until you can state the opposing case honestly and refute it fairly.
Canada needs more of that again.
Less censorship.
Less sneering.
Less expert class arrogance.
More courage.
More debate.
More freedom.
@irishpatriot91 Sending love and light from Canada. I’m of proud Irish descent. Travelled to the Island solo in 2015. Always intended to go back and drive the West coast. Save her for me. I’ll be waiting …
The Aboriginal Industry survives because failure pays.
Fix the schools, the housing, the water, the addiction crisis, and the violence, and a lot of professional reconciliators lose their reason to exist.
That is the scandal. Not asking questions. Not demanding audits. Not refusing to clap for another taxpayer-funded report while the same people remain poor.
Canada does not need more land acknowledgements. It needs literacy, property rights, clean water, safe streets, honest accounting, and the courage to stop funding failure.
The year is 1949.
The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain.
The year is 1956.
Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over.
The year is 1966.
A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots.
The year is 1979.
Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005.
The year is 1985.
Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning.
The year is 1992.
There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with.
So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now.
Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one.
It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.
Ayn Rand’s warning was not about some distant dystopia. It was about the moment a country starts punishing production and rewarding political access.
Look at Liberal Canada.
If you want to build, drill, mine, farm, hire, invest, or expand, you need permission from people who produce nothing but paperwork. If you play the subsidy game, hire the right lobbyist, repeat the right slogans, and flatter the right ministers, money magically appears.
Work gets taxed. Risk gets regulated. Failure gets funded. Competence gets buried under process. Graft gets renamed “partnership.” Waste gets called “investment.” Favours get dressed up as policy.
This is how countries decline. Not all at once. Slowly, stupidly, and with press releases.
Canada does not need more managers of decline. It needs a government that respects the people who actually produce the wealth in the first place.
Natives need to bear firmly in mind that if the demographics of this nation wildly vary from the traditional white majority, it won't be some great development for us.
It will be the opposite. We share a history with the whites, good and bad, but it's behind us now. The whites like and admire us, and as little as some of us want to admit it, they have helped us enormously.
The newcomers don't give a damn about us. We have no history with Pakistanis or Afghans or whoever. They are coming to conquer, that's it.
If we don't stand with the whites, we will fall together. It's that simple.
I love how I am supposed to embrace multiculturalism and accept all new comers. Yet the moment they get here they segregate themselves and make their own communities. But the moment I suggest that I want my own community without their ways Im called racist.
This is what we need!!! I have been telling White Men to fight back for ages and now FINALLY something is happening, i hope this goes viral, because this video needs to be seen by every single fighting masculine White Men! 🔥💪🏼
Questions for @Yvan_Baker
1. Does Somalia recognize Canadian heritage month?
2. Does Canadian govt advise against travel to Somalia?
3. How many Canadian communities exist in Somalia?
4. How many Canadians are elected to Somali govt?
5. Do Somali immigrants have to renounce dual citizenship to be elected to govt?
6. Why did Nate Erskine-Smith lose his nomination?
Answers:
1. Zero
2. yes
3. Zero
4. Zero
5. Yes
6. The electorate voted based on race, cheers to your political future!
#WEXIT
Yet another African migrant shows just how easy it is to exploit food banks here in Canada... and she put it all online last weekend.
Friday, she did a food bank haul.
Saturday, the very next day, she could suddenly afford dinner and drinks at a restaurant with her husband.
Why are @LenaMetlegeDiab and the IRCC prioritizing these leeches of Canadian resources? They are exploiting us right under our noses.🤨
"Treason."
That's the word LCol. (Ret.) David Redman uses when talking about Canada's immigration policies.
A serious accusation—and he explains exactly why.
Watch the full episode on YouTube.
https://t.co/LKapU6Ne7q
@FrontierCentre@DavidRe09886944
Bill C-34 creates a social media ban for Canadians under 16 at the expense of all Canadians' privacy.
Sections 26, 27(1), and 27(2) of Bill C-34 require that affected social media platforms “implement age-verification and age-estimation measures designed to prevent a person under the age of 16 from being able to have an account with, or be otherwise registered with,” those social media platforms.
Bill C-34 requires that such measures must provide for the “protection” and eventual “destruction” of “personal information that is collected for age-verification or age-estimation purposes.”
It is not yet clear how this will be accomplished. What is clear is that these measures must be “effective.” Users commonly verify their age by submitting government-issued identification documents, such as driver’s licenses or passports. And, the technology exists for social media platforms to estimate the ages of users through biometric data, e.g., facial geometry, eye shape, skin elasticity, hairline, etcetera.
This age-verification and age-estimation monitoring will not be limited to Canadians under age 16. For social media platforms to determine access eligibility for any user, platforms will have to evaluate the access eligibility of every user.
The goal of Bill C-34 is not merely to remove Canadians under age 16 from affected social media platforms but to keep them off those platforms. To achieve this goal, social media platforms may be compelled to adopt ongoing age-verification/estimation measures to ensure continued compliance.
However affected social media platforms satisfy these requirements, Bill C-34 fundamentally reimagines how all Canadians access social media.
This Bill deputizes affected social media platforms into forcing Canadians to surrender more data as a precondition of participation in the digital public square. This, in turn, raises serious concerns about Canadians' privacy rights and may engage constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure - guaranteed by section 8 of the Charter.
Read the full text of the bill here: https://t.co/BAHnXrsJIR
BREAKING
Conservatives on the health committee have forced the Liberals to withhold $50 MILLION from Canada Health Infoway after exposing the failed PrescribeIT program.
But Infoway is still defying the committee by failing to hand over PrescribeIT documents.
This is contempt.