@AaronBastani No, not really. He clearly lacks the depth to explain the technicalities of his proposed solution.His whole argument is emotional. Being good with maths isn't the same as understanding and explaining intricate systems. This shows the limits of your ability to judge this things.
@garyseconomics Ahhhh...I get it now, it's like a single-cause fallacy...no matter how much tax is increased, even in the areas you suggest, if we end up in your apocalyptic world it's because we still haven't paid enough taxes. π
@Keir_Starmer Let's be honest, there isn't much you can achieve in 2 years. You wanted 10! Kicked out before you could reach the next election cycle. Can't you just be honest and admit you and Labour failed?
@annaturley You think state schools are suddenly going to give the same standards and opportunities that private schools provided? Are you deluded? Anyone can "earn" the privilege to go to private school, it's not a class issue...quite evidently.
@Sai_Ishaya_@fionahtweet Again, lots of tech ways to restrict access and let the parents decide how best to manage it. Why do you want a system-wide approach to managing other people's children?
@BenInRushcliffe What a silly reductive argument. I use SM but I don't give all my information and carefully restrict it. Linking DID to SM is an hilarious as well as stupid argument.
@linmeitalks Good for you. I hold the opposite opinion and I value my privacy and identity integrity. It won't catch more criminals, because you guessed it, criminals will find ways to be criminals.
@KirstieMAllsopp@TonyGoldSE There are plenty of tech ways to restrict this. We don't need your anxiety knee-jerking more government to interfere with our lives quite frankly.
@KirstieMAllsopp The kids should be parented by their parents, so no, I don't worry about other people's kids. Why do you worry about mine? It is an authoritarian move that effects everyone.