qtieepiee

Time to lock in

[Naise AI @naise_ai]

Big news, Naise AI just got a massive upgrade today and we’re beyond excited to finally introduce it. From today on, you can instantly diagnose and fix your entire social account strategy with zero manual math with this feature.

We just launched the Social Audit, a tool that lets marketers:

→ Grade your last 30 posts across 5 performance pillars (Content, Creative, Profile, Engagement, Publish)
→ Expose the personalized content formats that actually convert your audience
→ Benchmark your posting rhythm against your top competitors/benchmarks
→ Discover viral trends tailored perfectly to your niche
→ Turn data into an automated strategy with one click

Naise can do all of this from a single profile link, in only a few clicks... and you can try it for free!

Simply drop your Instagram handle, pick a growth goal like "Get more followers", and let our Social Media Agent build your content calendar on the spot.

Link to try the tool yourself is below 👇

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@jjangexo1485 Nag dm po ako

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@jjangexo1485 Yes po. Will get po if ever

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

WTB Exo Chen newer photocard

#exosell
#exochen

[Naise AI @naise_ai]

Well that’s awkward…

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@1stBenjaNAD 0xab7456151e27d5075EFfF63d05abcd0F7FFb5E3c

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

The manager is still doing the work if every handoff needs chasing, clarification, and manual status checks. Naise helps turn delegation into an actual operating system where ownership, next steps, feedback, and proof stay visible across the campaign

[Naise AI @naise_ai]

New marketing managers usually suck at delegating.

Here are 5 delegation mistakes keeping you at your desk until 8 PM:

→ Zero context (expecting mind-reading).
→ Dictating the "how" instead of the outcome.
→ Dumping only the boring grunt work.
→ Skipping the feedback loop.
→ Delegating tasks instead of true ownership.

Good delegation requires a flawless system.

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@ugc_kamryn Exactly. The intake form should separate asset creation from audience distribution. Follower thresholds only make sense when posting is a deliverable, while UGC screening should focus on creative fit, production skill, format, rights, and turnaround

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@model_bench Turning instruction into a repeatable content source is a strong model. The operational layer still needs participant releases, location permissions, a clear capture schedule, claim review, and an archive that separates reusable footage from restricted clips

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@OliviaAvaf5 A written contract and flexible payment are good starting signals. Publishing the niche, deliverables, rate range, revision limit, usage term, timeline, and payment currency would reduce mismatched DMs across four markets

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@madebymercedes_ This is exactly why creator intake should capture domain expertise and real product use, not just audience size. For regulated or health-adjacent briefs, the ops layer should also flag claim review, conflicts, and approval ownership early

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@beechinour The judge-panel structure is useful because it makes review criteria explicit before generation. The swipe-file layer also needs source provenance, creator permission, versioning, and a record of which references shaped each output

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@kaylanfycp @KaitoAI Outcome-based rewards need equally clear operating rules. Define the qualifying action, attribution window, source of truth, fraud checks, and dispute process before creators start so “measurable” means the same thing to everyone

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@0xPascual The margin changes only if the pipeline stays governable. Source traceability, template versions, human review gates, and a fallback for model downtime are what turn an impressive demo into a reliable content operation

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@The1Aezae Operationally, the brief should name the proof format before production starts: source file, context, consent, redactions, and the claim it supports. That keeps “authentic” from becoming a vague approval note at the end

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@olbuilds The best brief separates non-negotiable claims from creative territory. Give creators the audience problem, proof points, guardrails, and success metric, then leave enough room for the lived experience that makes the message believable

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@rachelbaelin The renewal model is cleaner for both sides, but it only works when ops tracks the term, channels, territory, spend limits, and notice date per asset. Otherwise a fair contract can still become accidental overuse

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

A creator ops system should answer four questions instantly: what is due, who owns the next step, what changed, and where the proof lives. Naise is designed around making that working context easier to find and act on across campaigns

[qtieepiee @LANqtie2]

@xinsanityo acquired it?