Madam, what you are describing is prostitution with better public relations. The only difference is that you have replaced an hourly rate with a lifestyle requirement and called the arrangement “dating”.
And then, with astonishing confidence, you declare that only poor men will be triggered.
No. A man does not have to be unable to afford something to recognise that it has been priced.
If his bank balance determines whether he deserves access to you, why should he not ask what you bring that another woman cannot?
Beauty? There is always someone more beautiful.
Youth? Time is undefeated.
Sex? Desire alone has never sustained a civilisation, much less a marriage.
Status? Fortunes and reputations change.
The things that make a woman difficult to replace are rarely the things money can buy: character, wisdom, loyalty, peace, discernment, the ability to build with a man when the seasons change.
The poor man you ridicule may one day acquire money. But if money is the only language through which you recognise the worth of a man, no amount of money will cure your own poverty.
Akuume.