Most launchpads ask holders to trust the dev. $LCKD gives them receipts.
Launch a https://t.co/qzIzngIi86 token, choose how much of the dev buy to lock, and secure it on-chain through @streamflow_fi. The amount, duration, wallet, and transactions are public.
For partner launches, LCKD matches the dev buy. Every launch pays a 0.1 SOL fee that funds automatic $LCKD buybacks and burns.
GitHub integration ties developer profiles to repositories, products, verified wallets, and launch history giving builders a public track record.
Less “trust me.” More proof.
App: https://t.co/KKxktk4gMn
GitHub: https://t.co/gjSEmsOjPM
Chart: https://t.co/5FPAinSQ67
A builder choosing no lock should not be hidden behind soft language.
LCKD supports that path and labels the launch UNLOCKED in public.
Clear risk information is more useful than forcing every project into the same template.
Who wants to drop on solana:7UTubJ3W6JWwLUj82B9LgHFDmc8wFWtSNLis6u8epump
Its just like pumpfun, but people will trust your launch.
Also. We will match your dev buy and let you keep the supply!
Locks should be specific.
• How many tokens?
• Which wallet?
• For how long?
• What transaction proves it?
LCKD puts those answers on the public receipt so communities can verify the terms instead of decoding a vague promise from a launch thread.
Builders can now sign in with X or GitHub, connect a wallet, and build a public launch history around the identity they already use.
The goal is simple: make shipping easier while making the evidence behind every launch much harder to fake.
What actually happens in an LCKD launch?
The https://t.co/CCHtAO68vT token creation, initial buy, optional Streamflow lock, and $LCKD buyback and burn are assembled into one atomic transaction.
Either the full launch completes, or none of it does.
A token launch should leave more than a chart behind. On LCKD, the builder identity, signed wallet, launch transaction, and lock choice become part of a public receipt. Anyone can inspect the commitment without taking a screenshot at face value.
We keep coming back to this while building LCKD: what can a holder verify without asking the team? The builder wallet, launch transaction, lock terms and burn receipt should be right there. If the proof needs a private explanation, it is not doing its job.
We want more builders launching, not getting stuck in setup.
solana:7UTubJ3W6JWwLUj82B9LgHFDmc8wFWtSNLis6u8epump now lets you:
• Sign in with X or GitHub
• Launch with or without a token lock
Fewer hoops. Faster experiments. More people shipping and learning in public.
Live now: https://t.co/KKxktk4OBV
We’re bringing one-transaction token launches to @RobinhoodCrypto Chain.
Create the token, seed Uniswap v3 liquidity, and permanently lock the LP position with a single wallet approval.
Contracts are live. Tests are passing. Public launches are next.
https://t.co/W5ekmxVYnz
Just pushed Proof Missions for solana:7UTubJ3W6JWwLUj82B9LgHFDmc8wFWtSNLis6u8epump.
Each week, the community gets a token research task. Submit sourced evidence, pass two independent reviews, and earn a spot on the proof board.
First up: map LCKD's largest visible holders without passing guesses off as facts.
You can check it out here: https://t.co/nZIjOuzsJW
One thing that surprised us while building LCKD:
Locking 100% of your dev allocation isn't as simple as sending every token.
Protocols charge fees.
Wallets need rent.
Balances change after launch.
A lot of engineering goes into making one button feel simple.
The long-term value of LCKD is not limited to its own launchpad.
Public launch and lock receipts can become inputs for:
-Trading terminals
-Token screeners
-Wallet intelligence tools
-Community bots
-Developer reputation systems
Proof becomes more useful when other products can build on it.
Not every allocation needs to unlock on a date.
We’re exploring milestone-based releases for LCKD:
Ship the beta
Publish the repository
Reach a user milestone
Complete an audit
Deliver a promised integration
Tokens unlock when work is proven not simply when time passes.