If the Supreme Court is going to rule that children of illegal aliens — born in the US — obtain birthright citizenship,
then I can only conclude that America must ramp up deportation efforts & remove as many illegal aliens as possible immediately.
Now that the Supreme Court has given its blessing to birth tourism, it's probably worth revisiting this story from 2019.
A Chinese national named Dongyuan Li ran a company called You Win USA Vacation Services that helped pregnant Chinese women travel to the U.S. to give birth so their children would get citizenship. She advertised having served more than 500 customers, charged each between $40,000 and $80,000, used 20 apartments in Irvine to house the mothers, and took in $3 million in wire transfers from China in two years.
Customers were coached to lie on their visa applications and at the U.S. consulate interview in China, claiming they'd stay only two weeks when they actually planned to stay up to three months to give birth. They were told to come early in pregnancy and were coached on how to conceal their pregnancies from customs.
You Win's marketing pitch was that giving birth in the U.S. meant "13 years of free education," "less pollution," "an easier way for the whole family to immigrate to the United States," and "priority for jobs in U.S. government, public companies, and large corporations."
What could possibly go wrong by constitutionalizing the incentive driving these schemes?
Months before the Supreme Court ever ruled, I had a feeling exactly this would happen. An executive order was never going to be strong enough to permanently fix birthright citizenship, no matter how good the intentions behind it were. That's why I filed a constitutional amendment early this year instead of waiting around to see how the courts would rule.
This decision confirms what I already suspected. If we want real, lasting change, it has to come through the amendment process.
The Supreme Court just denied cert to review NY's categorical rule that allowed medical but not religious exemptions for healthcare workers, a policy that made it virtually impossible for those with religious objections to Covid-19 vaccines to keep their jobs.
Since only 3 justices wanted to take the case, and 4 justices are needed to grant cert, the DOJ's decision to jump in and argue that the Supreme Court should deny cert may have been the fatal blow that ensures the healthcare workers' religious freedoms now cannot be vindicated and NY can have a no religious exemption policy.
Shame on the DOJ. https://t.co/jPpLUOD0FZ
This. What Barrett and Roberts did is an absolute monstrosity that spits in the face of every soldier who ever sacrificed themselves for this country.
We cannot just accept this decision and move on. We are going to have to continue to fight and to get creative to overcome the decision of the court that the America is not a real nation.
It may take time, but we must not accept this. We must find a way to protect the sovereignty of the United States.
🚨Moderna's new mRNA flu vaccine reduced absolute influenza risk by 0.8% in trials. In the same trials, 6.4% of recipients suffered severe reactions, five times the rate of the standard flu shot, and five mFlusiva recipients died in the Phase 3 trial compared to one in the standard flu shot group. Cardiac events, including fatal cardiac arrest, were also recorded.
@ICANdecide sent an urgent letter to FDA's advisory committee documenting every one of these concerns before the vote. The committee acknowledged them, then voted unanimously to recommend approval anyway, with a note that further studies should be conducted after the vaccine is already in use.
America's most vulnerable seniors, the population for whom mFlusiva showed no statistically significant efficacy at all, will once again serve as the test group while regulators wait years to determine whether the product is causing harm.
ICAN will be filing FOIA requests for the full clinical trial data if mFlusiva receives final approval from FDA Acting Commissioner Kyle Diamantas.
Full article linked below 👇
https://t.co/GMh8MdoGOZ
If @ZachLahn wins the race for Iowa Governor, he will become the first Governor to call for the Covid shots to be pulled off the market. Please follow and support him, even if you don’t live in Iowa.
Some COVID shots were weapons. Others were placebos for cover.
Some COVID “vaccine” batches were packed with DNA plasmids, mRNA overload, and contaminants causing deadly reactions and diseases to develop. Other batches? Harmless duds designed to create plausible deniability. They needed “success stories” to sell the shots.
Batch after batch, outcomes varied wildly. Hot lots drove the injuries and deaths. The “safe” ones let people claim “I got it and I’m fine.”
This wasn’t manufacturing “oops.” It was a feature of a product rushed under emergency powers with zero real accountability.
#VaccineSafety #BatchVariability
68 Members, 25 states, and the momentum is only growing.
The Sharia-Free America Caucus continues to expand as more Americans recognize the dangers of Sharia and more elected representatives choose to take a stand.
We will not back down. BAN SHARIA.
Pediatricians get paid massive bonuses by Blue Cross Blue Shield for hitting high vaccination rates on babies under 2 years of age.
$40,000 for 100 fully vaxxed kids… $80,000 for 200.
But they lose the whole bonus if they don’t reach the quota (including the flu shot).
Your child’s “wellness visit” might be worth tens of thousands to the practice.
This is how incentives work in medicine.
I just introduced a bill to restrict taxpayer-backed mortgages to U.S. citizens only.
The sole purpose of our housing programs is to help Americans build wealth and achieve the American Dream. Illegal immigration is making that impossible.
ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT
While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity.
Read these words carefully.
Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory.
He went further.
Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it.
On fraud, Alito was surgical.
He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider.
Then Alito did something remarkable.
He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020.
He also torched the majority's logic directly.
Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives.
He also raised something nobody else is talking about.
What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings.
Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it.
And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against.
History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today.
The question is what we do with it.
I’ve been traveling a lot for treatment and some events and can confirm that @AmericanAir has been late more often than it has been on time. And not a little late, but hours and hours, frequently having to de-board flights and sit and wait until another plane can be found. It’s constant.
If they didn’t have a hub in Charlotte that allows for a lot of straight shots, I would stop flying them.