Casting new light on the Charter’s s. 11(b) right to trial within a reasonable time, #SCC elaborated on how the Jordan presumptive time limits on trial delay & legal framework for assessing undue delay operate in unusually complex criminal cases: R. v. Vrbanic, 2026 SCC 19.
Clarifying the requirements for relying on cause-of-action estoppel and res judicata, #SCC ruled 6-3 in a N.L. power-of-sale case that the appellant mortgagee was barred from relitigating its $4-million claim as the claim was already decided in an earlier court case.
Gary Mitchell -- Why success does not require sacrifice: The myth that’s costing law firm owners everything https://t.co/NX1xIaOz2Y "Success....requires intention. It requires the courage to challenge a culture that glorifies exhaustion."
David J. Rotfleisch: Canadian Appeals Court rejects pseudolegal tax arguments outright, without trial https://t.co/rY7omYW5Uz "The ruling reflects a broader judicial trend toward early intervention in cases that misuse court processes..."
David Rotfleisch: Using AI to prepare legal documents? Lessons for privilege protection in Canada https://t.co/8pICX465DV "Always use enterprise-grade or on-premise AI tools with zero-data-retention policies for tax planning...to minimize waiver risks."
#SCC has confirmed that the infringement on people’s right to vote by a Quebec law that interrupts the process of determining electoral boundaries is unjustified: Quebec (Attorney General) v. Lalande, 2026 SCC 13.
#SCC ruled 8-1 that the Constitution allows Parliament to set certain limits on parliamentary privilege for members of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians: Alford v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 14.
David Rotfleisch: Using AI to prepare legal documents? They might not have lawyer-client privilege protection in Canada https://t.co/TyhvenNWHm "AI proponents argue the ruling reflects institutional resistance to rapid advancements. Critics, however, warn of overreach..."
#SCC has found that Crown prosecutors generally do not have to prove exactly when a sexual assault took place, rather than prove it happened “on or about” a particular date or range of dates — unless the timing of the offence is essential to the case or crucial to the defence.
Gary Mitchell -- The AND mindset: How the AND approach changes decision-making https://t.co/AF6pwr31XE "The question is no longer this or that. The question is: How do we achieve both?"