Commercial litigation and intellectual property attorney. I will post my thoughts about random pop culture, trademarks, IP laws, and funny legal cases here.
Remember, names are not protected by copyright law, however some names may be protected under trademark law. See Circular 33 "Copyright Protection Not Available for Names, Titles, or Short Phrases" for more: https://t.co/pPATIV8i1W
Fun announcement to share: on Monday, July 27th, I will be joining the Houston law firm of Johnson DeLuca Kurisky & Gould (https://t.co/589RHkOHsB) as senior counsel. I will be handling commercial litigation matters and am excited to join the team.
That was fun. Got to present to HIPLA a CLE on trademark law and the "failure to function" of all these COVID and CORONA*-related applications being filed with the USPTO. Even got to chat about ethics.
I am giving a presentation to @hipla_houston tomorrow on COVID-19 and new trademark filings with the USPTO. I think you can still register at https://t.co/GpoHkx2MOv
In response to the @THR and @TheAVClub, among others. The SPACE FORCE trademark story is not really a story. No one is losing rights to anything. https://t.co/oMxwnCAGzk
Donald Trump tweeted a deepfake video last weekend. I wrote about some of the copyright implications and a possible fair use / parody defense (or is it satire!?). https://t.co/jucGemZPp1
After reading the @BuzzFeedNews article on Grubhub last week... I had some thoughts. Here's a short article on Lanham Act implications from using alternate phone numbers on Google/Yelp. https://t.co/5Yx4M4x1th
A few words and legal thoughts about Dr. Drew and his attempt to silence criticism of his bad coronavirus hot taeks via copyright laws. https://t.co/amdfS1s4WJ
I wish the writers of @BetterCallSaul consulted with me before they ran with last night's "copyright infringement" plot point. (Because that's not how copyrights work.) https://t.co/3JbXdaTWCK
@design_law I very much wanted to focus exclusively on copyrights coming out of law school in 2002, but I quickly learned that (outside 2-3 cities), this area of law does not pay the bills. I had to expand to other areas of "soft IP" law quickly.
My annual re-posting of this detailed article on nominative fair use as it relates to the SUPER BOWL trademark. Yes, you can say the words and do not need to refer to "the Big Game." https://t.co/1bZiBqfQlA
I wrote a bit of a deep-dive into the federal Massachusetts court's copyright analysis of the Prince / YouTube / concert video case. https://t.co/KrNcTx2CYM
Re-posting from 2 years ago: "Star Wars" and intellectual property rights. Disney may now control the most valuable IP in the world with this franchise. https://t.co/WBybm30m8v
I wrote a short analysis on some recent trademark filings based on "popular" internet terms. Few of these are actually trademarks. #failuretofunction https://t.co/SgwVLndNp9
Taylor Swift owns the copyrights in her songs, but not in her sound recordings. How can that be? Here is a short analysis of that conflict. https://t.co/Xm8ILwDgJm