Olivia
Online
Elise
@lclclm
Joined October 2012
280 Following
55 Followers
10K Posts
Two landmark studies, encompassing 8.7 MILLION people, found that COVID-19 “vaccines” increase your risk of SEVEN major cancers:
Breast: +54%
Bladder: +62%
Lung: +53%
Prostate: +69%
Thyroid: +35%
Gastric: +34%
Colorectal: +35%
All explained by mRNA’s 17 oncogenic mechanisms.
大公報 被下架文章
2025年11月28日星期五 A7要聞
天價收費 圍標合謀 利益輸送 劣質工程
揭開維修棚架背後重重黑幕
搭棚維修調查❶
宏福苑五級火大埔宏福苑五級火造成大量人命傷亡。翻查紀錄，今年至今已有至少10宗棚架起火事故（���表），大廈外牆維修搭棚的安全問題引發公眾強烈關注。警方昨日凌晨拘捕三名涉嫌誤殺的男子，他們為負責屋苑大廈維修的宏業建築工程有限公司負責人，包括現任董事侯華健及何建業。
大公報記者展開偵查，透過業界代表及多名知情人士，逐 層 揭 開 建 築 棚 架 背 後 的 黑幕，當中牽涉天價維修費、圍標合謀、利益輸送，以及工程質量等問題。
大公報記者
張真、李雅雯、陳玥、馮錫雄
競標公司遭「警告」被迫退出
有業界人士透露，由於圍標及種種原因，參與工程競標的建築公司越來越少。建築業界內的工程投標一直都欠缺透明度，有不願���名的工程業界代表接受《大公報》訪問時表示，十多年來，工程公司圍標的情況也非常嚴重，甚至有工程公司負責人參與競標後立即被人惡言警告，無奈退出競標， 「導致有水準的公司越來越少，沒有多少間公司投標，競標的結果自然就來來去去都是那幾間了。」 他形容，這種情況在業內已維持段長時間，導致行業生態非常不健康。他表示，今次負責人被捕的宏業建築工程，是業內有名的競標 「常勝將軍」， 「他們接了很多工程，但試問這麼多工程，哪有這麼多資源投入呢？」 業內常有偷工減料或用劣質的材料等事情；更甚的是投標價低者得，不少中標工公司往往會以拉長工程期的做法來繼續讓業主多些掏錢，以補回低價中標的利潤，「這些不時發生的事，在業內知情者看來是見怪不怪。」
阻燃網成本較普通網貴近倍
有建造業界人士透露，維修棚的阻燃網，每張約90元，沒有阻燃功能的普通網僅售50多元，而且阻燃網被太陽曬後會變脆，只用一次就要扔，普通防護網則可以不停重用。大埔宏福苑奪命火發生前，相關部門甚少巡查，不少行內人士抱着僥倖心態，鋌而走險。
這場火災的慘烈，背後是香港城市治理能力的考驗。該名建造業界人士透露，搭建金屬棚是合法輸入外勞的工種，加上金屬棚工人日薪低於竹棚工人，勢令本地工人收入受影響，金屬棚架的成本比竹棚昂貴約兩至三倍，因而增加施工成本，雖然有工人考獲搭金屬棚架資格，但由於市場需求不高及薪��較低，從事相關工作的人員不多。
另外，大公報記者昨日在警方執法押解負責人何建業至元朗蝦尾新村進行搜證工作時，接觸到其鄰居吳先生。吳先生透露，自己從事小型工程起家，對行業有一定了解，談到宏福苑疑因維修工程物料不符合安全規格觸發五級大火，他坦言這是業界多年的潛規則： 「香港做工程，個個項目貪平，中標往往是價低者得，報價最低才有得做。低價中標的工程如何畀足料？」
業界 ： 地盤工違例吸煙難管
吳先生指出，雖然現時香港政府已有很多規例規管工程，然而執行上仍有很大優化空間。有宏福苑居民直指今次大火的起因與搭棚工人經常吸煙、遺下煙頭，疑燃點防護網觸發大火。吳先生坦言有關情況是常態，「無得管，很多（工人）教唔聽，工人���多讀書少，吸煙是幾十年的習慣。」 業界曾建議在工程地盤劃出安全吸煙區，卻難以實行， 「有些人不會遵從在指定地方吸煙，總之難管！」吳先生透露，低價中標的公司工程延期也是常事， 「發泡膠和竹棚都是易燃物，經過一年的日曬雨淋，竹棚變得更乾燥、腐化，一旦燃燒火勢就會特別快蔓延。加上近日天氣乾燥又大風，所以宏福苑的大火，才會在短時間內就從底層蔓延到頂部，還連累了相鄰的樓宇。」
「這麼多家庭妻離子散，實在讓人難過。」 他認為，此次慘劇令人痛心，希望這場悲劇能促使政府和業界反思，立例監管，加強工程質量監管與施工安全巡查，嚴查違規操作，避免類似的人間慘劇再次發生。
1/ I don’t often speak in my professional capacity as a Hong Kong��born, UK-chartered construction professional (MRICS, MAPM, NECReg, among others). But I need to address inaccurate reporting about bamboo scaffolding in the Hong Kong Tai Po fire.
(1/9)
【Tai Po Fire, Bid-Rigging, and Bamboo Scaffolding in NSL-Era Hong Kong】
The Tai Po fire was not just a tragic accident; it was the predictable outcome of a broken system. A system where estate management, renovation contracts, and public safety have long been undermined by collusion, bid-rigging, and zero accountability. And since the NSL, Hong Kong has no civil society or independent media strong enough to hold these networks to account. Even when residents and expert and activists like Jason Poon, took their own samples of the netting and tried to expose the risks, they were ignored.
Wang Fuk Court was in the middle of a HK$330M “mega-repair.” Residents had protested the sky-high cost, accusing the owners’ corporation of force-pushing the plan through despite objections. Transparency was minimal. Oversight was weak. This is exactly how bid-rigging works in HK housing estates: pre-selected contractors, inflated prices, limited competition, opaque decisions, and incentives to cut corners on materials and safety, because no one is genuinely checking, nor can the civil society did what it used to do-- to hold different people to account and raise awareness of these issues.
During the renovation, the contractor wrapped the buildings with mesh, and foam boards that allegedly failed to meet fire-resistant standards. Some residents took a sample of the netting material to test on their own; videos showed it burned and dripped-- hardly in compliance with the regulations [1]. Here, cheaper, flammable materials meant higher profit margins and higher risk. The Wang Fuk Court contractor ignored safety again and again, with a long trail of corruption and violations. In 9 years, they racked up at least 17 regulatory breaches and fines.
When the fire started, the netting as shown in many videos, burned quickly. A slow fire became an inferno in minutes.
Police arrested multiple directors and engineers from the construction company. ICAC launched an investigation into the renovation contract itself — including how a controversial HK$330M plan was approved and whether corruption was involved.
This is the cost of collusion: Bid-rigging doesn’t just overcharge residents. It kills oversight, kills competition, and, in this case, helped create conditions that killed people. Hong Kong’s building maintenance system has tolerated collusion and corruption for years. The Tai Po fire is the clearest possible warning: corruption in estate management is not just a financial issue. It tells us a lot about HK-China relationship.
Beijing could and had rewritten Hong Kong’s political system overnight and crushed organised dissent, but it has never been able to cleanly uproot the entrenched construction and maintenance networks that profit from this model of “business as usual.” And this is where the politics of bamboo scaffolding enters the picture.
There is a long-understood agenda from Beijing to undermine Hong Kong’s bamboo scaffolding industry, not because it is unsafe, but precisely because it is a local craft, part of the Hong Kong identity, practised safely for decades, and one of the last corners of construction work where Chinese state-owned developers and their preferred contractors have never managed to gain a foothold. Bamboo scaffolding is not standard in the PRC; metal scaffolding is. And right now, mainland China faces a record glut of metal scaffolding materials, made worse by recent scandals over fake steel being used in their production , scandals that have no counterpart in Hong Kong’s bamboo trade.
So when the Hong Kong Government suddenly pushes a mandatory shift to metal scaffolding “for safety,” it is hard to ignore the timing. Yahoo Finance reports that Hong Kong experts defending the safety of bamboo scaffolding are being aggressively dismissed by PRC netizens, while the Government doubles down on the same narrative. In other words, this is not really about fire safety. It is a political and economic project to replace a resilient local craft with PRC-standard practices, conveniently absorbing a mainland oversupply while sidelining an industry Beijing has never been able to capture.
Thus, the tragedy is being used to accelerate “integration,” dressed up as technical modernisation. On paper, it’s about protecting the public; in practice, it sidesteps politically connected local players without ever reckoning with the actual causes of the fire: opaque estate governance, weak enforcement, collusion, and the hollowing out of watchdogs under the NSL.
We, Hongkongers, outside or inside the city do not trust the government or any of its proxies. Five years of national security crackdowns, media censorship, and relentless state messaging have not repaired the rupture exposed in 2019. That distrust is alive, deep, and justified.
HKSAR Gov and co are clearly not acting in good faith. Now, as you are reading, volunteers who organised themselves to help were reported to the police for unlawful assembly, a move that looks less like public order and more like spite. It is yet another sign that the Government now treats ordinary civic-minded Hongkongers as adversaries. And I fear reporting them is not the end of it, as Hongkongers came up with 4 very reasonable demands asking for investigation and accountability.
For us, the fact that John Lee decided to thank Xi Jinping first, rather than giving the credit to the brave firefighters, showed us that they are replicating the Mainland disaster-stagecraft: PR-first, people-last; party-state-first, people-last.
Taken together, the political economy of scaffolding, the erasure of civil oversight, and the Government’s behaviour during the crisis reinforce the same truth: the problem is not bamboo. The problem is a system where power, profit, and propaganda take precedence over safety, accountability, and the lives of Hong Kong people.
[1] https://t.co/1kEPkMcyEj
![chungchingkwong's tweet photo. 【Tai Po Fire, Bid-Rigging, and Bamboo Scaffolding in NSL-Era Hong Kong】
The Tai Po fire was not just a tragic accident; it was the predictable outcome of a broken system. A system where estate management, renovation contracts, and public safety have long been undermined by collusion, bid-rigging, and zero accountability. And since the NSL, Hong Kong has no civil society or independent media strong enough to hold these networks to account. Even when residents and expert and activists like Jason Poon, took their own samples of the netting and tried to expose the risks, they were ignored.
Wang Fuk Court was in the middle of a HK$330M “mega-repair.” Residents had protested the sky-high cost, accusing the owners’ corporation of force-pushing the plan through despite objections. Transparency was minimal. Oversight was weak. This is exactly how bid-rigging works in HK housing estates: pre-selected contractors, inflated prices, limited competition, opaque decisions, and incentives to cut corners on materials and safety, because no one is genuinely checking, nor can the civil society did what it used to do-- to hold different people to account and raise awareness of these issues.
During the renovation, the contractor wrapped the buildings with mesh, and foam boards that allegedly failed to meet fire-resistant standards. Some residents took a sample of the netting material to test on their own; videos showed it burned and dripped-- hardly in compliance with the regulations [1]. Here, cheaper, flammable materials meant higher profit margins and higher risk. The Wang Fuk Court contractor ignored safety again and again, with a long trail of corruption and violations. In 9 years, they racked up at least 17 regulatory breaches and fines.
When the fire started, the netting as shown in many videos, burned quickly. A slow fire became an inferno in minutes.
Police arrested multiple directors and engineers from the construction company. ICAC launched an investigation into the renovation contract itself — including how a controversial HK$330M plan was approved and whether corruption was involved.
This is the cost of collusion: Bid-rigging doesn’t just overcharge residents. It kills oversight, kills competition, and, in this case, helped create conditions that killed people. Hong Kong’s building maintenance system has tolerated collusion and corruption for years. The Tai Po fire is the clearest possible warning: corruption in estate management is not just a financial issue. It tells us a lot about HK-China relationship.
Beijing could and had rewritten Hong Kong’s political system overnight and crushed organised dissent, but it has never been able to cleanly uproot the entrenched construction and maintenance networks that profit from this model of “business as usual.” And this is where the politics of bamboo scaffolding enters the picture.
There is a long-understood agenda from Beijing to undermine Hong Kong’s bamboo scaffolding industry, not because it is unsafe, but precisely because it is a local craft, part of the Hong Kong identity, practised safely for decades, and one of the last corners of construction work where Chinese state-owned developers and their preferred contractors have never managed to gain a foothold. Bamboo scaffolding is not standard in the PRC; metal scaffolding is. And right now, mainland China faces a record glut of metal scaffolding materials, made worse by recent scandals over fake steel being used in their production , scandals that have no counterpart in Hong Kong’s bamboo trade.
So when the Hong Kong Government suddenly pushes a mandatory shift to metal scaffolding “for safety,” it is hard to ignore the timing. Yahoo Finance reports that Hong Kong experts defending the safety of bamboo scaffolding are being aggressively dismissed by PRC netizens, while the Government doubles down on the same narrative. In other words, this is not really about fire safety. It is a political and economic project to replace a resilient local craft with PRC-standard practices, conveniently absorbing a mainland oversupply while sidelining an industry Beijing has never been able to capture.
Thus, the tragedy is being used to accelerate “integration,” dressed up as technical modernisation. On paper, it’s about protecting the public; in practice, it sidesteps politically connected local players without ever reckoning with the actual causes of the fire: opaque estate governance, weak enforcement, collusion, and the hollowing out of watchdogs under the NSL.
We, Hongkongers, outside or inside the city do not trust the government or any of its proxies. Five years of national security crackdowns, media censorship, and relentless state messaging have not repaired the rupture exposed in 2019. That distrust is alive, deep, and justified.
HKSAR Gov and co are clearly not acting in good faith. Now, as you are reading, volunteers who organised themselves to help were reported to the police for unlawful assembly, a move that looks less like public order and more like spite. It is yet another sign that the Government now treats ordinary civic-minded Hongkongers as adversaries. And I fear reporting them is not the end of it, as Hongkongers came up with 4 very reasonable demands asking for investigation and accountability.
For us, the fact that John Lee decided to thank Xi Jinping first, rather than giving the credit to the brave firefighters, showed us that they are replicating the Mainland disaster-stagecraft: PR-first, people-last; party-state-first, people-last.
Taken together, the political economy of scaffolding, the erasure of civil oversight, and the Government’s behaviour during the crisis reinforce the same truth: the problem is not bamboo. The problem is a system where power, profit, and propaganda take precedence over safety, accountability, and the lives of Hong Kong people.
[1] https://t.co/1kEPkMcyEj](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G63Y-cTXcAA0yUp.png)
既然我這篇推文已經引起 200 萬人關注，我想好好利用現在的熱度寫一下，最新香港裡面正在發生的荒謬事！沒錯，是針對大火事件的事後措拖有多荒謬
之前一篇因為輸入上有部份需修正，因此我決定重新整理完整版本，希望大家看的是比較最全面的資訊，而不是被錯誤資訊及留言帶錯思考方向
今天是大埔宏福苑大火第 3 天，死亡人數增至 94 死，包括一名消防員，再次強調這不是一場普通大型意外，而是一場由棚網和制度崩壞引發的人禍
截止目前為止，當居民仍在苦等認屍、香港人互相守望在大埔區來回送物資，社會討論竟被推向「竹棚是否應該被淘汰」
請大家理性了解事情（我沒興趣爭論，因為每個人的主觀感受、認知和立場都不同，所以我寫清楚是了解），別再讓某部分人亂帶風向，事實擺在眼前：
竹棚用了足足一個世紀，亦非首次面對火災測試，甚至具備一定阻燃特性（不是絕對阻燃），你也大可以話用竹有危險，沒有人說過竹是最安全，但不必拋出鐵架是絕對優勝
如上圖所見，大部份竹棚在大火仍原好無缺，只是被燻黑狀態，再加上竹纖維本身的熱分解溫度多在 250–350°C 區間，根本不可能造成影片中在 10 秒中由下至上快速像汽油一樣拖火向上跑的情況
所以貿然要將火災責任歸咎至竹棚，顯然是未能對症下藥，真正推高火勢的是人！
私人工程公司所採用的低規格棚網、塑膠帆布、發泡膠窗板，這些材料一旦遇火，燃燒速度甚至比木材更快，這才是導致第一座大廈起火後迅速蔓延大火至其他 6 座大廈的原因，但這些都不是真正原因，如果當初監管有做好，根本連這個棚網都不應該被批准為合格（可以重看下方引文中，我提到公營私營工程的監管分別）
關鍵從來不是誤��竹棚，是誠實面對材料安全和監管漏洞，不宜將問題簡化，甚至扭曲並污名化竹棚，而且我們大部份人都不是建築專家，在等待報告出來之前，寧可先探究根本源頭，應該比針對是哪個物品引起火勢蔓延會更有意義吧？
我這樣提出的原因是，從 2024 年起，已經有很多反對聲音反映這場維修本不應該以這樣方式進行，更別說事實上不應該同時讓 8 座大廈進行維修，這是誰的錯誤？是棚架、棚網嗎？是人啊⋯⋯
所以如果只是換成鋼棚而不處理監管漏洞，只會將問題換上新包裝，對啊，鋼架不會燃燒，但金屬的傳熱性都會將高溫帶到其他地方，甚至受熱後可能彎曲塌陷
當年巴黎聖母院也是金屬棚架，因為大火而造成嚴重變形，換竹為鋼並不能阻止下一場火災，除非問題真正被正視，否則材料永遠只是替死鬼
重點問題：
► 誰批准用低阻燃棚網、同時圍起 8 座大廈？
► 誰容許外牆覆蓋發泡膠？
► 法團如何能在居民反對下強推 3.3 億維修工程？
► 為何有人早就提出因為工人長期使用走火通道，懷疑直接剪了火警鐘的線，導致沒有火警提示，當時卻被管理處忽略？
今天香港失去 94 條命，部分住戶甚至只用了 10 分鐘就由家變成火海，有人困在樓梯間等人救，有人被活活焗死
3 天後，我們香港人還在收屍，大家還在關注這個利益輸送圈子問題種下的果，而社會第一時間想到的不是追責和制度重整，而是提出逐步淘汰竹棚、全面改金屬棚架的路線圖
荒謬嗎？老實說也不算荒謬，因為我們就是生活在這個地方，有很多事情大家都明白，但也不太想要去什麼都不做就默然接受，當我們的偉大領導人都出來發聲慰問，我相信他也希望真相被查清、責任被追究，而不是讓問題消失，關事的人應該交出來，這樣才是對國家對社會更好，而不是縱容壞人犯法
最後，作為任何一個地方的平民，我們來多角度剖析，讓問題客觀呈現，這才是對死去的人找出一個交代的相對比較有效的方法
這篇分享的重點，還是落在這次事件的人為錯誤，在評論區在分什麼中國香港這樣那樣、煽動他人的情緒，有腦袋的網民都知道這些對話都是沒有意義，因此我也建議大家在看完後能按情況回覆其他人，我們是來了解事情，不是來吵架的⋯⋯在網上大肆張揚地發佈自己的政見看的有多通透，其實不威風，沒有人會被你說服，你只是活在自己的世界而已，讓更多人清楚了解事源才是最重要的事
至於最終答案如何，我們相信大部分人都能理性判斷
作為一個土生土長的香港人，我可以說今晚這場大火絕對是人禍
現場是大埔宏福苑，整個屋苑有 8 座大廈。今天下午約 2:51，宏福苑的宏昌閣外牆正在進行維修時，外牆棚架發生火警，已經有網民在 Threads 拍下當時小火的情況，可是在十分鐘後火警已經往上順延
問題一：有住戶表示火警發生時火警鐘未能響起，濃煙突然湧入，多人來不及逃出
問題二：多名網民和住戶在 Threads 已貼出疑似現場其中一座大廈的維修棚架中，有工人吸煙和亂拋煙頭的照片和影片，雖然不能證實是今天發生的，但已經有人認為這是最大機會引發火警的原因，畢竟居民已經多次提醒工友不要再吸煙
問題三：維修背景
這個絕對要講，為什麼是人禍？
在 2024 年年初，宏福苑的屋苑法團通過一項總額約 3.3 億港元的大維修方案，用於整個外牆更新
方案覆蓋 8 座大廈約 1984 戶住戶，每戶需分 6 期繳費，每戶需負擔約 16–18 萬港元，這裡已經很離譜，因為基本上是強迫每戶付錢出來，更別說這次為了節省成本而直接 8 座大廈同時進行維修，增加風險
當時法團拒絕重選並以法律手段回應部分業主，而維修工程當然直接開始，整個屋苑被搭上竹棚架和保護網
但其實，保護網沒有用上最新政府標準所要求的防火網，而是普通的阻燃物料，我附上的第 2 張圖片可以清楚看到，所謂阻燃也沒有成功起到作用，反而棚架比保護網更堅固��證明問題出在【沒有用上防火網】
重點也來了，因為宏福苑是一個私人屋苑，所以不會由政府直接管理，而是由立案法團委聘承建商，也就是私人工程公司
私人工程不需要跟足政府標準，比如說公營工程防火規範，所以他們用的竹棚和普通阻燃圍網，的確是合法，但前面我也提到這是十分高風險
再加上工人吸煙讓火種掉落，近年政府大量引入外勞，也沒有說有什麼條例去監管和控制外勞，那如果這次工程的工人也是外勞呢？
香港工程一判再判早已是常態，為了壓低成本，最底層工人往往薪金最低和培訓不足，監管亦有限，這當然是制度問題，而不是工人本身的問題
所以這不是單一意外
而是由成本導向的維修決策和鬆散監管制度，也因為欠缺防火網和安全文化薄弱，一層一層累積而成的人禍，最後導致今天大家看到的五級大火爆發
當然，這一切��有官方最終調查結論，還需要等待政府公布原因，但在這個世界裡面，有多少出來的資料是真假，大家可以想像到
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! https://t.co/czQRkZmr59
#FightForAmerica
Tomorrow is our last chance to defeat the corrupt establishment. GET OUT AND VOTE! #FightForAmerica https://t.co/czQRkZmr59
The primary purpose of modern medical research is not to make the world a healthier place. It is to make money.
Once you understand this, you will never look at expert advice or "the science" the same again.
In Taiwan they count the vote publicly
They hold up all the ballots and show them to everyone
Anyone is allowed to walk right up and film them
Now ask why your 'democracy' doesn't allow this
NEW - Researchers have now observed "unexpected molecular processes" inside the cells of people after mRNA injection — FAZ
'Smart meters'
'Smart cars'
'Smart phones'
'Smart cities'
'Smart homes'
The word "SMART" refers to "self-
monitoring, analysis, and reporting technology."
A smart illusion of safety and convenience, but actually it's about tricking us into digital control and surveillance.
NEW - Study finds "presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose" in both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections.
https://t.co/lTtpxeHek1
Cody received two doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
“...he was coughing up blood + hanging onto the walls trying to stand up...” — Heather Hudson
He went to the ER where they diagnosed him with a pulmonary embolism + thrombosis.
#TheDefender
https://t.co/HMD8SVkv76
Imagination Land!
You're very hard to control when you're healthy.
You're very hard to manipulate when you're clear minded.
You're very hard to influence when you're sovereign.
You’re very hard to rattle when you’re centered.
You can’t really control the things happening around you, but you can focus on strengthening your mind, body, and soul to help yourself better endure and overcome the challenges that we are facing.
Become ungovernable.
Become unbreakable.
Just say no to digital ID.
Just say no to CBDC.
Just say no to masks.
Just say no to vaccines.
Just say no to eating bugs.
Just say no to “beyond meat”.
Just say no to lockdowns.
Just say no to social distancing.
Just say no to fake news.
Just say no to critical race theory.
Just say no to GMO food.
Just say no to the green agenda.
Just say no to globalism.
Just say no to BULLSHIT.
Enough is enough, all of their plans are ruined if everyone stands up.
Be brave, history will judge you well.
Beware of people who consistently want you to be afraid.
Fear is the easiest way to control people.
Shortly after AA77 allegedly crashed into the Pentagon, the FBI confiscated all surveillance videos. In the video obtained through a lawsuit by @JudicialWatch, you can see that no plane crashed into the Pentagon, but rather a missile.
The questions that arise for me are as follows:
▪️What did the US government know, and why did they bomb the Pentagon?
▪️What happened to AA77, especially to the people on board?
▪️How can people still believe the official version?
The US elite doesn’t hesitate to harm millions of people (see Covid); why would they hesitate to kill a few thousand countrymen for “the greater good”?
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Jan Jan
Seen from Pakistan
Hakan Kara
Seen from Turkey
حماده عرص المتناكه امال مراتي 🐖🐖
Seen from Egypt
Yusuf
Seen from Turkey
Klara Wiess
Seen from United States
อยากเย็ดแม่กับแม่ยาย
Seen from Thailand
Pakistani feet models 🇵🇰
Seen from Pakistan
Momlovessex 
Seen from Turkey
خول دلدول كلوتات البنات
Seen from Egypt
GOONTARDS
Seen from France
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.2M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.7M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
110.7M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.9M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.7M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81.6M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
73.1M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
70M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
62.7M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.8M followers