Svalbard, a remote Arctic archipelago, holds inconvenient secrets about our climate history.
A new study reveals it was up to 9C warmer around 10,000 years ago when CO2 was just 260 parts per million. Despite this warmth, glaciers didn't vanish. They survived, supported by increased snowfall.
Svalbard then cooled for the next 8,000 years while CO2 kept rising. No tipping points, no runaway melt.
Yet today's climate models project the same 8 to 9C of warming by the year 2100 (using the discredited RCP8.5 scenario), and predict widespread glacier loss.
That directly contradicts the historical record. Even the study's authors admit the future may follow the past. Warmer, wetter conditions could bring more snowfall, stabilizing or even growing glaciers.
The fatal flaw in climate modeling has raised its ugly head once again. It can't replicate history. And when the past contradicts your theory, it's the theory that's broken, not the past.
Well done to cricketing legend Sir Ian Botham who has launched a campaign against huge wind turbines wrecking some of the most beautiful landscapes in England.
Remember Johnny Ball, he made kids programs back in the 80s & 90s about science & the environment..... UNTIL he called out the climate bollox & claimed that schools were brainwashing kids with rubbish. He then got cancelled for some reason. Here's an old clip where he talks about CO2
Royal Meteorological Society tells us to ignore colder-than-average winter and just look at the highest temps. Classic case of cherry-picking data to “prove” non-existent climate crisis, unsupported by any logical analysis of tiny effects of man-made CO2
According to climate panic puppies, the searing hot summers of 1934 and 1936 were “just weather.” But three hot days on the east coast this week are evidence of a “climate emergency.” It’s hard to imagine how anyone could be this mentally dysfunctional. Climate alarmists are, though.
New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable https://t.co/FnaBLkmTWD via @ccdeditor For further context, the Northern Hemisphere is said to have warmed by 4-5°C “within a few decades” 14,500 years ago (Ivanovic et al., 2017), and during these centuries, sea levels rose at rates of up to 7.5 meters per century (Smith et al., 2011), which is 20-30 times faster than modern rates.
125,000 years ago, the Thames was full of hippos.
2,000 years ago, the Romans grew grapes on the Scottish border.
Today, British councils force people to rip out their aircon because of "unprecedented climate change".
https://t.co/DhOjKIDFxN
Ann Widdecombe speaking absolute dropping truth bombs on the Jeremy Vine show a while back.
“People are taxed when they earn money, they’re taxed on the interest if they save money, and now if they want to give it to their children, they’re taxed on that too. It’s WRONG.”
She’s absolutely right.
Taxed when you earn it. Taxed when you save it. Taxed again when you pass it on, that’s the Labour way!
How much more does the state want?
Couldn’t agree more, Ann.
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry says “It’s time to declare victory against climate stupidity and move on,” as major media outlets shut down their climate desks, corporations ease back on emission-reduction targets, and polls consistently show the public rates climate change low on their list of priorities.
This is how the Net Zero bollocks works …
The “green” ferry project in Scotland was supposed to cost £97 Million. And has actually cost taxpayers about £500 MILLION! … and now they will fund another £600,000 for specialist consultants because ferry staff need training to handle imported LNG.
And that LNG is imported via Kent before being transported hundreds of miles to Scotland…. Using diesel.
After all of that, the CO₂ saving is less than 9% er …. And that’s optimistic!
The entire exercise has been a pointless waste of Taxpayers money for private companies profit! … 🤡
If earth doubled its co2 output the global temperature would not rise 1 degree. When I point this fact out lefty people lose thier minds haha it’s true.
That’s real science though I’m not paid by the Eu or WEF to lie like they pay university professors to teach bull crap on the climate to fit their agenda
The @metoffice are utterly useless!
This week, I have had 3 amber warnings of thunderstorms.
We have had solid sunshine, apart from 5 minutes of light drizzle.
If they can't get the weather right, why should we believe their "global warming" bullshit?
The UK State Pension: £12,500/year for a lifetime of work
An illegal migrant: £41,000/year to the taxpayer
We are spending over THREE TIMES more on unvetted arrivals than on the seniors who built this country
The math just doesn't add up
BBC just stated the heatwave is “unequivocally because of human induced climate change.” BBC must now provide proof - not consensus, actual
proof - of this ridiculous claim. If they can’t, they’ve broken their impartiality charter again
Nothing says CLIMATE GRIFTER more than someone using weather, e.g. using daily high temperatures, to make arguments about climate. It is the epitome of charlatanism in any climate discussion to misrepresent daily weather as climate. Whoever does it is either a fraud, a propagandist, or just a low IQ individual