@Ryan_on_cEDH Because it helps a specific type of player win more … The “moral ban” on lying disproportionately benefits the yappers, who coincidently has a pretty big overlap with people who likes to yap on social media
@FreedomWaffle_ I think think they are an acceptable solution to “king making” scenarios, but wish players hasn’t becomes so good at forcing them. A draw rate of around 15 % would be perfectly healthy to me
@LemorasCards Agree. Game changers was such a good solution to the casual/comp divide. But if game changers still has to be balanced for anything above precon level (ie bracket 3), it becomes kind of useless
@_Memo_4302 Are you testing Chatterfang along with Soulwarden? I started like that, but tbh the goblin has seemed more relevant as a dockside wannabe that enabled the midgame GA -> Intuition (or similar) Lines
@IBlameMax@SethArar@MTRA_IPGA Thanks for the quick answer 🙏🏽. I agree with this direction as players already could preface every spell with “anyone want to say something before I put it on the stack”.
I assume that this ‘take back window’ closes if anything else is put on the stack?
@SethArar@MTRA_IPGA So for example my last tourney my opponent played demonic tutor into my other opponents oppo. When he placed the card on the table, I said “dont do it into the oppo”. We ‘ruled’ that it was too late to take back, but under the revised MTR, I could have stoppes it from resolving?
@_Memo_4302 The ability to play for a draw when you’re otherwise out of the game adds a meaningful a positive dimension to cEDH games and is the only thing that should matter when assesing whether something is a spite play