Lee Lundgren

Guitarist · Fabricator · Operator of Magneto Design Lab/@mdlpickups

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@SwipeWright @elonmusk Real or imagined, eminent domain scares property owners. “You can get used to anything after a while, even hanging.”

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@OwenGregorian

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@Cernovich The sense that there is some possible resolution makes engaging in a fight worth it.

[Owen Gregorian @OwenGregorian]

People Are Loading Their Writing With Typos to Prove They're Not AI | Krystle Vermes, Futurism

Typos used to be glaring eyesores. In the age of AI, they’ve become a sight for sore eyes.

In fact, Michael Waters argues in The Atlantic that small, forgivable typos are now serving as signs that something was actually written by a human, and hence is worth reading. In a world where everyone expects a ChatGPT’d response, typos have mutated into a mark of authenticity. A misspelled word or two is indicative of the human element.

“On a base level, many of us are willing to invest time in reading a long email if we sense that someone actually wrote it, line by line,” Waters wrote.

It’s a quirky face on a galling cultural phenomenon. As Angela Haupt unpacked in a piece in TIME earlier this year, there is no quick and easy way for people to determine the authenticity of what they’re reading anymore. If you can’t discern who you’re really talking to — human or AI — you’re less likely to feel confident and grounded in the discussion.

“There’s a real hunger right now for writing that feels unmistakably human, with all the quirks, oddly specific details, and little flashes of personality that AI can’t quite mimic,” psychologist Stephanie Steele-Wren told TIME. “Humans are naturally chaotic and idiosyncratic. AI is not.”

As fondly as we now regard typos, not everyone is craving the human element. In some instances, AI has replaced that in users’ lives, whether it be in the form of mental health support or an intimate partner. This suggests that, while there may be a demand for human connection, there’s still a niche for fabricated connections offered by AI. But at the very least, everyone is crying out for a choice in the matter.

https://t.co/bNeeiPgB7O

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@Timcast Time well spent!

[Wokal Distance @wokal_distance]

Every time I see people on the right trash Jordan Peterson as not being sufficiently radical, or as being some kind of idiot or dupe, I remember videos like this and realize that the future in no way belongs to those people.

[ScreenRant @screenrant]

Nearly two and a half decades after #Firefly was canceled, #NathanFillion has been sharing videos of himself visiting the homes of his former co-stars – including Gina Torres, Morena Baccarin, Sean Maher, and Summer Glau – and telling them that "it's time." 🤔

Read More: https://t.co/YK62DRoBpQ

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@mattvanswol If the story is important the truth will be hidden in misdirection and obfuscation.

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@MargoinWNC @PeteKaliner

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@TRHLofficial Lenoir, NC as well.

[Natural Philosophy @Naturalphilosy]

“The only thing an old man can tell a young man is that it goes fast, real fast, and if you’re not careful it’s too late. Of course, the young man will never understand this truth.”

— Norm Macdonald

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@BrianRoemmele Let’s hear it for the Wrecking Crew!

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@mattvanswol @BreitbartNews “Vengeance is Mine; I will repay, says the Lord.” Also “Stare into the abyss, and the abyss stares back!”

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@mattvanswol

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@PeteKaliner

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@pureMetatron AI companies be like

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@thevivafrei Elite Overproduction

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@BurtMaclin_FBI Audio Engineers RN

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@matt_vanswol AKA “Your boos mean nothing, because I know what you cheer for!”

[Lee Lundgren @leelundgren]

@matt_vanswol There’s weighing an opinion. There’s also weighing the source of the opinion. One is more valuable and instructive than the other.