Okay, so let’s get this straight...
The @DailyMail goes to a mother’s home to question her about her son’s activism, despite @RealDannyTommo not even living there.
Meanwhile, @TRobinsonNewEra is going to trial accused of harassing Daily Mail journalists.
The BBC reported:
“Mr Yaxley-Lennon is accused of using his X account to harass journalists Andrew Young and Jacob Dirnhuber, as well as their family members, across three days.”
So here’s the obvious question:
What’s the difference?
Tommy is ACCUSED of harassment for what he allegedly did online. Yet journalists can turn up at the home of an activist’s mother, who isn’t the activist and doesn’t even live with him, to question her about her son?
If @'ing journalists’ online crosses a line, why shouldn’t the same principle apply when journalists target the families of activists?
You cannot demand boundaries for your own families while ignoring those same boundaries when chasing a story.
Same principle. Same standard.
So if 2 ports can deny entry then we have to wonder why other ports arent doing the same. If 2 ports have the power to threaten criminal prosecutions and boats took notice and moved on then that shows that they have a choice 🤔
Yes it’s true. Upto 500 mature beautiful trees will be chopped down for a bus route!
The next time your government lectures you about CO2 remind them that buses kick it out… they don’t sequester it 🤡
I interviewed survivors of October 7th.
Devastated parents of massacred young people.
Starved hostages.
Women who had to tend the bodies of girls so mutilated they could only be identified by DNA or a nose ring without a face.
Unimaginable savagery.
Hamas carried out “ethnic cleansing” of Jews.
Since the Government published its official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — it has been weaponised to silence legitimate criticism of Islam, its practices and its history.
But the entire process has been secretive and shady. Earlier this year, the FSU revealed that all five members of the Working Group appointed by Angela Rayner to draft the definition had alarming links to Islamist organisations — including the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND.
Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy has now accused Angela Rayner’s office of breaking the Ministerial Code and breaching the Government’s own data policy.
This comes after an FOI request submitted by Timothy revealed that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government had deleted every response to the Working Group’s consultation.
Why would the Government delete all the responses if it had nothing to hide? Were extremist groups given the opportunity to influence the consultation that formed the basis of what amounts to our new Islamic blasphemy law? And did ministers direct officials to delete the submissions?
@NJ_Timothy told The Telegraph: “Labour has shown an unacceptable disregard for transparency and accountability by deleting the evidence behind a definition which they want the entire public and private sector to adopt.”
Read more from FSU Campaigns Officer @MaxHThompson below 👇
I stood waist-deep in the waters of northern France and watched the entire British border strategy collapse in real time.
A dinghy packed with roughly 100 illegal immigrants launched right in front of us.
Standing on the beach were 10 officers from the French Gendarmerie Nationale. They did absolutely nothing. They watched it happen in knee-deep water where they could have easily intervened.
When I confronted an officer and asked why they let the boat go, his exact words were chilling: “Our order is to let them go”.
The Home Secretary is handing over £660 million of your hard-earned taxpayer money to France. Most of it is completely unconditional. Yet French officers are explicitly prohibited from stopping these boats once they hit the water.
Until we stop paying for inaction, exit the ECHR, and implement a real deterrent, these dangerous crossings will never end.
Donna Jones, police and crime commissioner for Hampshire spoke to #BBCBreakfast about Portsmouth.
The BBC later deleted her last 15 seconds.
Listen and see why ….
When BLM rioters were tearing London apart, looting shops, attacking the police, the Labour Party took the knee and said they understood their anger.
But when it comes to actual peaceful patriots protecting our country from an illegal invasion, they instantly vilify them.
🇩🇪 La líder del partido de Derecha en Alemania, Alice Weidel tiene razón:
“Un país que castiga por pescar sin licencia, pero no por cruzar sus fronteras ilegalmente, es un país gobernado por idiotas”.👏
Some time ago UN Agenda 21 became Agenda 2030 to which most Governments in the World including the UK have signed up.
Please find just 2 minutes to listen to what it’s endgame really is for you and your family.
🚨 I have a very simple question for the authorities.
If a migrant boat is still afloat and the people on board are not actually in the water or in immediate danger, on what legal basis is the RNLI collecting them and transporting them to the UK?
Section 25 of the Immigration Act 1971 makes facilitating a breach of immigration law a criminal offence.
And under the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, the maximum sentence was increased to life imprisonment.
Yes, there are statutory protections for genuine rescue operations. I accept that.
But that makes the question even more important:
Where does rescue end and facilitation begin?
If these people are being rescued from genuine danger, show us the evidence.
If they aren’t in danger and are instead being transported towards the UK, then the public deserves to know exactly why that does not amount to facilitation under Section 25.
Nobody should be above the law.
Not the Government. Not people smugglers. And not anyone else.
Investigate it. Apply the law. And if a criminal offence has been committed, prosecute whoever is responsible.
Haha... they think we wont ever look. Big mistake. Did you ask why Mauritius wanted the Chagos Islands? apart from the money we were throwing at them? well....
look at this, ahhh under the sea! Mauritius has been pursuing enormous areas of seabed. The International Seabed Authority (obvs run by the UN) record Mauritius exploring polymetallic nodules within Mauritius's claimed EEZ/extended continental shelf, overlapping the Indian Ocean nodule field south of Chagos. (worthe $ TRILLIONS, read my book)
These nodules, taking upto 100 million years to develop, contain manganese, nickel, cobalt and copper, alongside other valuable elements.
On 30 July 2026, the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf APPROVED Mauritius's claim to approximately 147,000 square kilometres of additional continental shelf around Rodrigues.
It gives Mauritius recognised rights over the seabed and subsoil of that extended continental shelf and Mauritius says the decision has significant implications for the exploration and use of natural resources. (they mean blowing up the sea bed, read my book)
Yet, Britain has just published a Critical Minerals Strategy warning that we are dangerously dependent on concentrated foreign supply chains. Britain says critical minerals are essential for national security, defence, manufacturing AND Net Zero.
And we are STILL handing Chagos over with huge amounts of taxpayer money for 100 years .... Seriously people, why?
Could it be that nation states wont exist in 100 years?
You really should read my book 🔥
Piccadilly Gardens. When I was based in the city centre police station, no officers wanted to work in the gardens because it was dangerous. One officer had his arm broken making an arrest - this was two decades ago. It is so much worse today.
ONLY 200 years ago, 42,000 Greek Christians were massacred by Muslims & 52,000 were sold into slavery.
More White Europeans were killed & enslaved by Muslims than Africans in the Atlantic slave trade & they have colonised more of the world than any other group of people.
After fighting them off for 1400 years, our own traitorous Western Governments mass imported them into our Nations.
They all have to go back.
We cannot coexist with Islam, there is nothing but terror & horror that follows them into every Nation they enter.
It ALWAYS ends the same way.
Remigration is the only peaceful solution or Civil War is inevitable.
It’s not if but when?
No one wants war on our shores.
🚨NEWS: There has been widespread OUTRAGE on social media after it was revealed that the Government had waiting for the migrants in Portsmouth:
- Tents
- Clothes
- Pyjamas
- Supplies
- Food
- Water
- Cleaning products
- Footwear
This wasn't an unplanned detour from Dover
This was all planned and co-ordinated
The Government of the UK are facilitating these crossings
They are not trying to stop them
THEY ARE BRINGING THEM OVER
“THIS ISN’T YOUR KIND OF PLACE.”
That’s what a security guard told me after recognising me while I was interviewing people at 'Black in the Square'.
A public event described as: 'An annual free festival held in Trafalgar Square, London, that celebrates Black culture and creativity.
I had simply walked into the event and started asking questions about what it was about and why London taxpayers were funding it.
Suddenly, I’m being told I shouldn’t be there.
Why? Because I'm a white man? A British patriot?
I’m an Englishman. I have every right to walk into a public event and ask questions.
I was assaulted along with my cameraman, they tried to steel our equipment, threatened us multiple times and called me a racist.
This is Britain in 2026.
A racialised event tells an Englishman that he’s not welcome at an event in his own country.
The more we are demographically replaced, the more this is going to happen. Racism towards white men is an endemic in Britain.
@MayorofLondon - you are an evil traitor.