Is X not what it used to be? 👀
The headline’s deliberately cryptic, but the changes are genuinely interesting.
Over the last few months, more and more people have been flocking to X specifically for monetisation: private messages, DAOs, guides on ‘how to rack up views quickly’ and a whole industry centred on making money.
And then, last night, an update rolled out that clearly upset a lot of people.
From now on, earnings will be based not on regular views, but only on ‘Qualified Impressions’ - views from users with Premium or Premium+ subscriptions.
What’s changing:
>500K qualified impressions over 90 days instead of 5 million regular views
> You need an active Premium subscription + to be 18+
> Replies and non-unique/copied content are practically pointless - they don’t help with monetisation
And this is where it gets interesting.
Some say that farming X has become much harder.
Others believe that the competition will now be weeded out, and payouts for high-quality traffic will increase.
Who really knows the ins and outs of X monetisation - is this actually a nerf or just more FUD?
Dear trader , listen .
Enter a trade only if the 15m and 1h TF match the trend on the 4H TF
If they don't match, it's better to do something else that day.
This will help you preserve your deposit.
Don't thank me.
You need to watch at $INDEX
@vladtenev sub on @TheIndexFi and lot project in eco looks good. Like indices and etc.
For me it's look like a long term situation and chance to hold until good profit.
4/
A person who understands how a complex probabilistic system behaves stops fighting the market.
They start playing by its rules.
And the rules are very similar to quantum ones: you can never know the exact future, but you can know the probabilities very accurately and manage risk wisely.
That's exactly why those who really understand math and quantum physics find it objectively easier to make money in trading.
They see structure where others see chaos.
They earn systematically, while most people are just paying them for their mistakes.
3/
Mathematics gives a precise language: stochastic processes, measure theory, Bayesian inference, optimization.
Quantum physics gives the right intuition: state superposition, entanglement, the uncertainty principle, irreversibility.
Trading just becomes a playground where this intuition turns into money.
3/
Mathematics gives a precise language: stochastic processes, measure theory, Bayesian inference, optimization.
Quantum physics gives the right intuition: state superposition, entanglement, the uncertainty principle, irreversibility.
Trading just becomes a playground where this intuition turns into money.
2/
That's why the strongest traders and quants are people with a deep understanding of math and modern physics.
They don't try to guess where the price will go.
They think in terms of probability distributions, stochastic processes, and risk management under fundamental uncertainty.
2/
That's why the strongest traders and quants are people with a deep understanding of math and modern physics.
They don't try to guess where the price will go.
They think in terms of probability distributions, stochastic processes, and risk management under fundamental uncertainty.
1/
The market is a real quantum system.
The price at any moment isn’t the 'truth,' but a cloud of probabilities.
Buyers’ and sellers’ orders are tangled up with each other.
One big player or a piece of news can instantly change the state of the whole system on the other side of the world.
Classic technical analysis works here about as well as Newtonian physics in the micro-world - only roughly and on a large scale.
1/
The market is a real quantum system.
The price at any moment isn’t the 'truth,' but a cloud of probabilities.
Buyers’ and sellers’ orders are tangled up with each other.
One big player or a piece of news can instantly change the state of the whole system on the other side of the world.
Classic technical analysis works here about as well as Newtonian physics in the micro-world - only roughly and on a large scale.