I'm curious to see who she could be playing. Some have speculated that she could play Vicki Vale and I could see that. Equally, she could be a prominent member of the Court of Owls or an Arkham inmate or psychiatrist.
But to be honest, I don't think the boycott actually care too much about cancelling people who support JK Rowling because they're using Twitter to do it, which is owned by Elon Musk. All boycotts are made up of a hypocritical element at the end of the day.
I don't have an issue with this, I feel like this is to give him a bit of a break from the DCU. Unfortunately, any actor associated with this show is going to have to contend with delusional psychos who believe it is morally righteous to attack people for just accepting a role
even though that doesn't make the actor transphobic. Based off of this logic, anyone who supports James Gunn's projects is automatically a pedophile. It's fundamentally unintelligent to make a baseless assumption.
It continues to prove how gullible people can be on the internet. The truth is, like Man of Tomorrow, we don't know what the full story entails or which characters specific actors are portraying. We obviously have to wait for the first trailer before overreacting.
I think it's generally baffling people assumed he was playing Harvey Dent based off of scoopers, who have a track record of being wrong majority of the time, and completely ignored the fact that Sebastian Stan never directly confirmed he's playing Dent.
It has been a cruel July for Nerdrotic and Critical Drinker. Deluding themselves into believing they could take down Christopher Nolan and Spider-Man, two big money makers.
Something I love about the cinematography of Clayface, similar to The Batman and The Penguin, is how it looks like a movie you want to watch in black and white. I hope Rob Hardy continues to be the cinematographer for the DCU Batman.
Something these four movies share in common, besides being perfect representations of the respective characters, is the fact that there is an artistry and practicality to each of these movies.
Aunque el el cine de superhéroes tiene sus altos y bajos…
estoy contento que por lo menos los héroes más importantes de cada editorial hayan tenido estupendas películas.
To my knowledge, no, Tom Holland hasn't said anything controversial, but I don't see how an actor's comments could derail a movie because, well who gives a shit what an actor thinks. You said this is the reason why Supergirl flopped and ignored the obvious fact that the movie
Spider-Man new movie is almost a Billion already.
Question though has Tom Holland said anything controversial lately?
Examples, like bringing up divisive politics, calling comic fans toxic and telling ppl not to watch his movie.
Just wondering, what PR has been like.
released in-between Toy Story 5 and Minions, billion dollar franchises, and Supergirl isn't that big of an IP compared to Spider-Man. Additionally, the movie was met with mixed reception, but I doubt that's due to Milly Alcock's comments and more due to the fact that to some
not the same Jean Grey from the comics where she's already a selfless hero. In other words, she needs to learn with great power comes great responsibility before we eventually see her as a part of the X-Men.
I fail to see how she's "just playing Max with powers". It's pretty obvious that the MCU is setting up mutant hatred and how Charles Xavier will take in this fellow mutants who are either on the run or being abused by government officials. Secondly, Jean Grey in Brand New Day is
The weekend is over and it’s time to be honest…….Sadie Sink was completely miscast as Jean Grey.
Not only is she just playing Max with superpowers but she’s also completely out of place.
The main villain of a Spider-Man movie should never be an X-Men member. 🤷