The sob almost knocked me down with their 20 ft radius of cheap cologne. Just insufferable in so many ways. These words should have never came out of my mouth unless I was writing about some place that'd be similar to hell.
Get off the speaker phone you fucking mongrels. They just want to bother people with their shit foreign language. Thier arrogance will be studied one day.
Get off the speaker phone you fucking mongrels. They just want to bother people with their shit foreign language. Thier arrogance will be studied one day.
For many of us in the rust belt, our families stories follow the same pattern.
From Great-Grandpa to Grandpa to Dad to Son
Great-Grandpas Farms went bankrupt, small town was killed, blacks burned down the neighborhood and murdered or raped a close friend/relative, so Grandpa moved his young family to the suburbs to work in manufacturing, his career went great but they closed the plant down halfway through Dad's career.
Dad did odd jobs until he retired and it wore him out, he lost hope, got fat and his back and knees hurt from the bad jobs he worked so he pushed his son into college, who graduated with a STEM degree and debt and has been in and out of work for his entire adult life due to COVID, DEI and H1B.
He isn't married or dating. When asked he just shrugs.
First we had “DEMOCRATS ARE THE REAL RACISTS” now we’re getting “THE YANKEES ARE THE REAL RACISTS”. You people have learned nothing from the past 15 years. If neocons couldn’t achieve a diverse conservative coalition I don’t think guys waving rebel flags will either.
Oh this is a good'in. Couple hours in and I'm loving the lingo and the soldier's point of view. Hard to quit listening to this one. Highly recommend.
#Dixie#CoAytch
There is one single idea that every “credal nation” libertarian and RINO needs to get through their skull.
The nation is its people. The “Constitution” is a descriptor, not an exportable document of conduct.
Liberia has a near carbon copy of our Constitution, they also have a problem with cannibalism.
This is why when you change the makeup (or constitution) of the people, the nation ceases to function, to exist.
The American Revolution was something specific to the American People. The French tried to replicate it and it ended in mass beheadings and Napoleon.
The less Americans we produce domestically and the more paperwork “Americans” (non-Americans) we import from heathendom, the less American we become as a whole.
Diversity and multiculturalism only ends in violent balkanization.
“A hyphenated American is not an American at all.”
Thankfully he had a son at a young age who carried on the bloodline. I believe I found two others who served but only my Great Grandfather X3 had lots of info. He was Alabama CO E Infantry X. 🫡
"Hitler makes us politically radioactive, we are better off not mentioning him"
"He was a foreign dictator that has nothing to do with America"
"He lost the war, why venerate a loser?"
"National Socialism was for Germans only, we need an ideology that is for our people specifically"
If we ignore the obvious de-radicalization narrative at work here, and the simple cowardice that lies behind these sentiments, they still remain fundamentally incorrect. Hitler remains the single most powerful symbol that we can possibly invoke. What makes him toxic, radioactive, and dangerous, is also precisely what makes him an invaluable asset to our struggle. I will explain this using a Jungian framework:
Everyone, including the collective psyche itself, has a shadow, the dark, negative, repressed aspects that are unacceptable to the conscious persona. When unintegrated, and repressed, this shadow manifests in destructive, harmful ways, including irrational violence, anxiety, and psychosis. It also tends to be projected upon others.
Hitler has become the shadow of Western Man. Our current moral order is a direct inversion and rejection of the values that he championed, the defining features of the liberal order, are nothing more than the antithesis of National Socialism.
Hitler, as our collective shadow, contains the following unconscious elements:
• The Power of the State
• Racial Identity and Hierarchy
• Masculine Strength and Vitality
• Purity and Beauty
• The Desire for a Mythos and Destiny
• The Prerogative of Life
Any movement that wishes to establish an order based on any of these fundamental principles will become conflated with the shadow, and thus will always be equated to Hitler. The more the movement adheres to them, the stronger the association will be. Trying to sidestep Hitler is not only counterproductive, but futile. The moment you advocate for the sovereignty of the state against globalist interests, for racial cohesion, for beauty over ugliness, for strength over weakness, you WILL be called a Nazi. There is no escape. This is the psychosocial reality of the West today.
In light of this, the strategic choice should be obvious. Instead of running from our shadow, we must seize it. We must integrate it. We must become it. By doing so we harness the tremendous, transformative power that this archetype contains. By ignoring it, and running from the powerful associations it holds, we deny ourselves access to the psychic wellspring of incredible power that it represents, and condemn ourselves to using symbols and narratives that can only dance around the fundamental truths Hitler faced head on.
If Hitler and National Socialism was truly irrelevant to all but the Germans, we wouldn't see the hysterical, almost religious, obsession with him throughout all Western nations. His name recognition wouldn't be comparable to Christ, or Muhammad. The Aryan race wouldn't constantly find itself accused of all original sins of which the NSDAP has been made scapegoat.
So stop acting as though you have the power to somehow choose whether Hitler is a symbol of your movement or not. You don't, he already is. He will always be whether you want him to be, or not.
"The fact, too, is, that the original proprietors of the negroes never lost, entirely, the hope of recovering them, still called them .theirs, would- have reclaimed them, upon the principles of postliminy, if they had been retaken by the army of America, or its ally, and thus even the plenipotentiaries themselves might, without any impropriety, have talked of the negroes in British possession as the negroes of the American inhabitants. These ideas are supported by other parts of the 7th article. Why is the "carrying away" only mentioned, if negroes which might be thereafter seized were chiefly contemplated? Is it not reasonable to believe this, with this impression, it would have been said that negroes shall not be captured and carried away? If a critical exposition must be resorted to, "carrying away" implies that the thing to be carried away is already in possession. Another part of the stipulation is that the American artillery that may be in the fortifications shall be left therein. That is not artillery made in America, but artillery the property of America, or, in other words, of the United States. Now, this artillery was surely the property of the British, at the moment of capture, and yet no pretense, as far as I can learn, was hatched up to carry away our cannon."
-Attorney General Randolph (12/15/1794 to John Jay)