@TitleTownTalks Too many people losing their minds over something with an easy explanation when reading the REAL article. If you didn’t mean to be deceiving, understood. Just wish other people weren’t freaking out about something that isn’t even close to GB’s biggest issue
@TitleTownTalks You realize the way you are framing it is that they are looking to sell the rights next year or near future? Even though it is in direct quotes that it will not be happening anytime soon? Just quit the clickbait bullshit is all I’m saying
@TitleTownTalks They would not need to in order to stay in GB, simply false to say they would. Even if they HAD to do so, it would be a last resort, maybe 40 years from now. Revenue sharing keeps small markets alive and GB has enough previous projects (building TitleTown) to prove they are fine
@TitleTownTalks Listed as an option not in a direct quote from Policy. You keep quoting others who are taking things out of context. I just have a feeling you are not very informed and enjoy clickbaiting by spreading misinformation. Either that or you do it intentionally, which is sad
@TitleTownTalks “That’s not a threshold we’re going to cross anytime soon” doesn’t mean you have to get your panties in a wad. Packers need capital, to do so you sell naming rights to the surrounding areas, not Lambeau. This isn’t a soft launch, he literally said it won’t happen anytime soon!
@TitleTownTalks Not convinced you know how to read. "We're soon to be the only stadium without naming rights. That's not a threshold we're looking to cross any time soon”